Jump to content

Can Means become the Orioles’ version of Kuechel?


Obando

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

The Statcast broadcast of the AL wildcard game has some of their special stats scrolling on the crawl and this one caught my eye.

2019 Fastball Rise Leaders

4th place MLB-wide was 2.5 inches.  There were three pitchers at 2.8 or better, well clear of the field.

Justin Verlander, Gerrit Cole and John Means.

I guess "Rise" sounds cooler than "Sinks Less".  Since physics and human ability means no fastball thrown from mound 60' away will actually rise due to its backspin and Magnus force lift. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did we (as an online community) know that Means gained 210 RPM of spin on his average fastball from his 2018 debut to 2019?

Because I can't find any article about it and I feel dumb that I just realized that it happened. 

I think I'm going to have to pay more attention to the major league team next year rather than just focusing on the minors. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Did we (as an online community) know that Means gained 210 RPM of spin on his average fastball from his 2018 debut to 2019?

Because I can't find any article about it and I feel dumb that I just realized that it happened. 

I think I'm going to have to pay more attention to the major league team next year rather than just focusing on the minors. 

Hmmm,  I had him at an increase of 185.   Guess I need to recalibrate my 4K radar Rapsodo machine.   :)

Honestly I really enjoyed following the minor leagues this year at the expense of the major league team.   I will probably do so again in 2020, but I admit I will likely want to watch more ML games as the future pieces actually become regulars on the team.

Unless Chris Davis is on the ML roster.   God help them if that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Did we (as an online community) know that Means gained 210 RPM of spin on his average fastball from his 2018 debut to 2019?

Because I can't find any article about it and I feel dumb that I just realized that it happened. 

I think I'm going to have to pay more attention to the major league team next year rather than just focusing on the minors. 

Does anyone know how?  And what are the practical effects of this?  Does that result in a meaningful amount of "rise"?  And I guess just as important: is that repeatable?  How consistent is fastball spin?  Can I set a record for most questions in one paragraph?

Edit: Some of my questions answered here: https://www.drivelinebaseball.com/2016/11/spin-rate-what-we-know-now/. (Sorry, browser suddenly decided to not like embedding links).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I guess "Rise" sounds cooler than "Sinks Less".  Since physics and human ability means no fastball thrown from mound 60' away will actually rise due to its backspin and Magnus force lift. 

I feel like Chad Bradford managed a few FBs that crossed the plate higher than he released it.......Okay, pedantic comment is over now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Does anyone know how?  And what are the practical effects of this?  Does that result in a meaningful amount of "rise"?  And I guess just as important: is that repeatable?  How consistent is fastball spin?  Can I set a record for most questions in one paragraph?

I recall reading a number of spin related articles on Fangraphs and Hardball times and the only firm takeaways I could recall is that the time from well a ball is not spinning (in the hand during the throwing motion) to the point were is has been spun is silly small (fractions of a second) so a pitchers spin tends to be very much tied to their specific body type/throwing style. Pitchers with higher release points tend to impart more spin. Spin rate tends to scale linearly with FB velocity. Pitchers avg spin rate is pretty consistent across seasons but it is possible to change your spin rate by altering your release or mechanics (that is to say there are examples of pitchers who have changed their spin rates going forward).

High spin pitchers tend to be more effective than low spin pitchers on a number of metrics (K, pop-up, etc), but a similar correlation is found when you look at dSpin per velocity. That is to say, since spin rate scales linearly with fastball velocity the further a pitcher is away from the average spin on a FB with the same velocity, the more effective the pitch is (think Koji Uhera FB, his spin rate wasn't silly high if I recall, but it was very high for a pitch with such pedestrian velocity).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Does anyone know how?  And what are the practical effects of this?  Does that result in a meaningful amount of "rise"?  And I guess just as important: is that repeatable?  How consistent is fastball spin?  Can I set a record for most questions in one paragraph?

Edit: Some of my questions answered here: https://www.drivelinebaseball.com/2016/11/spin-rate-what-we-know-now/. (Sorry, browser suddenly decided to not like embedding links).

Spin is strongly correlated with fastball velocity, average fastball spin increase with average fastball velocity. The way Driveline standardizes spin is with the simple Bauer unit, Spin Rate/Velocity. That's probably an oversimplification of the relationship, but that's what I'll use for Means for lack of a better metric. Means had 24.04 Bauer Units on his 4S fastball in 2018, so he began the year in a similar place and saw some really significant increase in Bauer Units as the season progressed. 

image.thumb.png.7aeec435d13deefc08a13bf3b67cb4d2.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Spin is strongly correlated with fastball velocity, average fastball spin increase with average fastball velocity. The way Driveline standardizes spin is with the simple Bauer unit, Spin Rate/Velocity. That's probably an oversimplification of the relationship, but that's what I'll use for Means for lack of a better metric. Means had 24.04 Bauer Units on his 4S fastball in 2018, so he began the year in a similar place and saw some really significant increase in Bauer Units as the season progressed.

Mean's average velocity was pretty constant month to month around 92 mph. So this means that he increased his spin rate from 2300 (24) to 2438 (25.5)? That's a pretty significant bump from what I recall reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SurhoffRules said:

I feel like Chad Bradford managed a few FBs that crossed the plate higher than he released it.......Okay, pedantic comment is over now.

One of my favorite books is Randall Munroe's What If? Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions.  So please indulge me...

1. Submariners throw a fastball with topspin, not backspin, so any spin they impart to the ball would result in extra sink.

2. Any ball that reaches the plate higher than release point would have to be thrown at an angle and velocity that would counteract the force of gravity pulling the ball down, plus/minus any spin-related aerodynamic effects.  In other words you'd have to throw it up, higher than level.

3. If Bradford threw a ball at 120 ft/sec (about 82 mph),  it left his hand 18" above plate altitude, and he threw it upwards at 2.5 degrees, it would cross the plate about half a second later at a height of... well.. it would it hit the plate.  Ignoring the topspin, which would cause it to bounce in front of the plate.  So... he'd have to throw it at more than a 2.5 degree angle.  Probably like 3.5 degrees.  So maybe 20' into its flight it would be 2.3 feet above field level (AFL), and would sink from there.  If he wanted the ball to hit the catcher's mitt at more than 18" AFL he'd have to throw it with a launch angle of more like five or six degrees.

4. If a pitcher could throw a perfect knuckleball with no spin whatsoever, at 65mph, releasing 8' from the ground, it could be released at a dead-even 0 degrees relative to the field and it would hit the catcher's mitt just above the ground.

5. In a weird coincidence of units, a ball thrown with no aerodynamic lift/sink will travel about 100 feet for each 100 miles per hour it's thrown, if it's released 8' from the ground at zero degrees from level.  So a ball thrown 100 mph from a mound would hit the bottom of the backstop if it was 100 feet away (actually 103, but close enough).  If you threw the ball 500 mph it would it a backstop 500 feet away, give or take.  1000 mph, 1000 ft. 20,000 mph, the ball would be incinerated by the friction of the air hitting it at 20,000 mph. .8c would result in a small thermonuclear explosion (see book referenced in first sentence).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SurhoffRules said:

Mean's average velocity was pretty constant month to month around 92 mph. So this means that he increased his spin rate from 2300 (24) to 2438 (25.5)? That's a pretty significant bump from what I recall reading.

His spin rate bounced around in 2019, but the general trend was upward. Here is spin rate by start, with start 1 on the left and start 31 on the right. Most of the adjustment was the first 6 starts vs the rest of the season. The spin rate the first 6 starts was higher than his average spin of 2166 in 2018, but that difference can pretty much be explained by increased velocity.

 

image.thumb.png.dc9d19df5545cbc4dbce28a5206c040d.png

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

2. Any ball that reaches the plate higher than release point would have to be thrown at an angle and velocity that would counteract the force of gravity pulling the ball down, plus/minus any spin-related aerodynamic effects.  In other words you'd have to throw it up, higher than level.

My favorite effect of the reversed spin for Bradford was the fact that his slider (spinning perpendicular to the plate) had less downward force (due to spin) acting on it than his fastball. He's the only player I can think of off the top of my head with a vertical rise on his breaking pitch(+1-2 with out gravity).  Even given the slower speed (more gravity bringing it down) his FB and SL dropped nearly the exact same amount. Bradford's Brooks Baseball Page

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

His spin rate bounced around in 2019, but the general trend was upward. Here is spin rate by start, with start 1 on the left and start 31 on the right. Most of the adjustment was the first 6 starts vs the rest of the season. The spin rate the first 6 starts was higher than his average spin of 2166 in 2018, but that difference can pretty much be explained by increased velocity.

That is interesting. His velocity in the first 6 starts was the same as it was all year (he carried an amazingly consistent FB from start to start). Eyeballing it it looks like his first six he spun at 2250ish and then jumped up to about 2400ish for the rest of the season. I wonder if he tweaked something intentionally or just found his groove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SurhoffRules said:

That is interesting. His velocity in the first 6 starts was the same as it was all year (he carried an amazingly consistent FB from start to start). Eyeballing it it looks like his first six he spun at 2250ish and then jumped up to about 2400ish for the rest of the season. I wonder if he tweaked something intentionally or just found his groove.

I have to think it was an intentional adjustment he made, perhaps with help from Holt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I guess "Rise" sounds cooler than "Sinks Less".  Since physics and human ability means no fastball thrown from mound 60' away will actually rise due to its backspin and Magnus force lift. 

Amen amigo.  I know Tom Tango's part of the Statcast team, so put my trust there that better due diligence measuring the average sink due to gravity 2019 MLB fastballs felt, and making that the new zero on the scale, is in there more than I could ever do.

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Does anyone know how?  And what are the practical effects of this?  Does that result in a meaningful amount of "rise"?  And I guess just as important: is that repeatable?  How consistent is fastball spin?  Can I set a record for most questions in one paragraph?

Edit: Some of my questions answered here: https://www.drivelinebaseball.com/2016/11/spin-rate-what-we-know-now/. (Sorry, browser suddenly decided to not like embedding links).

In The MVP Machine, there's an anecdote about Trevor Bauer basically cheating for an inning by using an adhesive on his hand to impart extra spin on his pitches.  It was told as his proof of concept as he was prosecuting the improved Astro performance of his BFF Gerrit Cole.

Having had a night to digest, Means here is really intriguing.  I generally understand a pitcher's spin to be a personal signature, but this make me wonder if Elias/Sig know how to teach it a little.  I know curating better spin efficiency is teachable and part of the current performance frontier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Amen amigo.  I know Tom Tango's part of the Statcast team, so put my trust there that better due diligence measuring the average sink due to gravity 2019 MLB fastballs felt, and making that the new zero on the scale, is in there more than I could ever do.

In The MVP Machine, there's an anecdote about Trevor Bauer basically cheating for an inning by using an adhesive on his hand to impart extra spin on his pitches.  It was told as his proof of concept as he was prosecuting the improved Astro performance of his BFF Gerrit Cole.

Having had a night to digest, Means here is really intriguing.  I generally understand a pitcher's spin to be a personal signature, but this make me wonder if Elias/Sig know how to teach it a little.  I know curating better spin efficiency is teachable and part of the current performance frontier.

Sunscreen, he needed some sunscreen.  Very fair skin, and he's outside all day.  I hear Bullfrog works well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...