Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson signs


Luke-OH

Recommended Posts

Just now, atomic said:

I am sure someone on here can give you the cost benefit analysis.  12 percent chance you pay $2 million and you get $60 million in value. You still come out a head if you make enough of these picks.

Yeah but the odds are still stacked against you.  I think we just shouldn't pick any players unless we have a top 5 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for the player he only gets one chance.  I would go the college route if I could get into a good college. If I were going to the community college Chris Davis went to I would probably think about starting baseball right away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah but the odds are still stacked against you.  I think we just shouldn't pick any players unless we have a top 5 pick.

Well I guess you didn't go to college if you can't understand why they pick these players. 

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, atomic said:

If you play well in college the money will still be there.  

And if you get injured in college, it won't. If he gets a nice overslot bonus, it makes perfect sense to take it at No.42. There's the whole time value of money thing in the argument of now vs. later and if the Orioles agree to pay his college should the baseball thing not work out, he's protected there. I think your whole argument rides on the expectation that he's going to blow the money and end up with nothing. While that certainly could happen, it's not inevitable. He seems to be a thoughtful person based on the the time he put into making this decision. If invested, the money from the signing bonus alone can set him up well even if he doesn't crack the big league roster.

I think there's a case to go to school and case to take the money in either case, he'd be betting on himself. To take the money, he's betting he can make The Show. To go to college, he'd be betting on his ability to play well in college and stay healthy. It's a personal decision and I'm just glad he choose the Orioles.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, atomic said:

And for the player he only gets one chance.  I would go the college route if I could get into a good college. If I were going to the community college Chris Davis went to I would probably think about starting baseball right away. 

If the money is there, it makes little sense to attend college especially if you're a position player. Kris Bryant is a player who annihilated minor league pitching, rose quickly through the minors, and has put us tremendous numbers at the Major League level yet he won't be able to hit free agency until age 30 and will almost certainly receive less money and less years than Machado and Harper got by hitting free agency at a younger age. With the way baseball is heading, if players aren't in the majors by age 21 or 22, there's little chance they'll get a mega contract. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TINSTAAPP said:

If the money is there, it makes little sense to attend college especially if you're a position player. Kris Bryant is a player who annihilated minor league pitching, rose quickly through the minors, and has put us tremendous numbers at the Major League level yet he won't be able to hit free agency until age 30 and will almost certainly receive less money and less years than Machado and Harper got by hitting free agency at a younger age. With the way baseball is heading, if players aren't in the majors by age 21 or 22, there's little chance they'll get a mega contract. 

  

Kris Bryant has already made $32 million dollars and will get a raise in arbitration next year.  I don't think he is the scenario you should be using. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, atomic said:

Kris Bryant has already made $32 million dollars and will get a raise in arbitration next year.  I don't think he is the scenario you should be using. 

Bryce Harper will have made $120 million and Manny will have made $115.5 million when Bryant hits free agency in two years. If Bryant gets $25 million the next two years in arbitration, he'll still have made $30-40 million less than Harper and Machado and will unlikely get anywhere near a 10+ year, $300+ million deal at 30 years old. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, atomic said:

In the history of the draft only 6 players picked at 42 have put up 1 WAR.  I think having fun in college while getting an education is the smart move. Auburn us a good college.  Odds are he blows his money and doesn't make the big leagues.

Do you get all warm and fuzzy every time you post something contrarian?  Like, no one thinks you're smarter than the rest of the board for posting contrarian opinions.

 

Also, the 42nd pick statistic is absolutely meaningless.  He's a teenager with a ton of talent who many predicted would go earlier.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Frobby said:

This logic is way off base.     The real questions for Henderson are:

1.    What are the odds he would get a bigger signing bonus if he went to college and waited three years?

2.    What are the odds he would improve his chances of getting to the majors, and staying there, by going to college instead of starting his pro career at 18?

3.    How much does he value the opportunity to go to college at 18, as opposed to going later if he wants?

4.   How much would he enjoy playing college baseball, compared to minor league baseball, over the next three years?

These questions are personal and specific to the player, and there is no one size fits all answer.

As to whether he will blow his money, that’s in his control.     It certainly doesn’t have to happen that way.

 

The logic is laughably bad.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, atomic said:

In the history of the draft only 6 players picked at 42 have put up 1 WAR.  I think having fun in college while getting an education is the smart move. Auburn us a good college.  Odds are he blows his money and doesn't make the big leagues.

How about 42 or below? Anything below counts if you pick the right one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...