Jump to content

Despite speculation, Orioles not on the market to be moved or sold


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The money exploded in the 70s and 80s, as teams realized they had to have cash to afford free agents and cable happened at the same time.  There has been one major league team move since the money went crazy.  One.  And they played in a French-speaking province that MLB couldn't figure out a way to blackmail into building them a free Mallpark to replace a terrible old crumbling multipurpose half-dome.

It would be astonishing if MLB was so craven as to allow Camden Yards to sit vacant so Nashville or Las Vegas can try to start something the Orioles began 137 years ago.

With the arrogance of Manfred and MLB, it wouldn't surprise me if they attempted such a thing. While I'm more inclined to believe the O's aren't going anywhere, I wouldn't be shocked whatsoever if they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True story, about 12 years after the Mayflower incident, I  relocated from Severna Park to Rolla Missouri on my own, literally Uhaul. About 2 years late I had to relocate from the mid-West to southern VA and the cheapest Company-sponsored option was Mayflower. I refused to use them and paid the difference out of pocket. I would do it a hundred times over and I hope Jim Ersay burns in eternal damnation!  rant over

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, $Greatness$ said:

With the arrogance of Manfred and MLB, it wouldn't surprise me if they attempted such a thing. While I'm more inclined to believe the O's aren't going anywhere, I wouldn't be shocked whatsoever if they did.

They can "attempt" all they want. They'd still need to get 75% approval. Good luck finding 22 (OK, technically 22 1/2) owners to sign off on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Curse of the Bamdino said:

They can "attempt" all they want. They'd still need to get 75% approval. Good luck finding 22 (OK, technically 22 1/2) owners to sign off on that.

And at least under the Selig regime they never publicly announced a vote among the owners that wasn't unanimous or nearly unanimous.  They just quietly make the issue go away if they couldn't get everyone on board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2019 at 6:58 AM, Going Underground said:

If you’re still wondering, the Orioles aren’t being sold and will not be moving to Nashville, a couple of notions that a high-ranking team official labeled this week as “nonsense.”

 

Move out of the region and they’d have to leave behind the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network, which has helped the value of the team climb to more than an estimated $1 billion.

Worried about the lease? They have a five-year option built into their contract with the Maryland Stadium Authority.

 

On top of that, even if the outcome of the MASN lawsuit were so negative for the Orioles as to make a move or sale attractive, either would have to be approved by MLB, which has been at odds with Orioles ownership over the MASN situation for several years.

 

But a high-ranking Orioles official called recent media reports about a possible sale “rank speculation” and said whispers about the team moving to Nashville are ridiculous.

 

But those who have long known the Angelos family doubt they would cost Baltimore the Orioles. They would not want to be forever linked to Robert Irsay, who has been reviled in this city since he moved the Colts under the cover of night.

 

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/analysis/schmuck/bs-sp-orioles-sale-and-relocation-rumors-remain-unsupported-20190815-44ftpk2ebrasrdggkbnm7lwiv4-story.html

Greaaaaaat. Now I guess I have to return my cowboy hat and cancel my line dancing class at the YMCA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

I know pretty absolutely nothing about this rumor. I just have one question. Is there any smoke to this rumor? 

My first thought would be to say no.

That somebody in the org probably kicked the idea around for 2 nanoseconds and that's it.

Yet, Tony-OH started the thread, and I doubt he was doing this as a troll. 

Which leaves us in a circle of doubt and suspicions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

My first thought would be to say no.

That somebody in the org probably kicked the idea around for 2 nanoseconds and that's it.

Yet, Tony-OH started the thread, and I doubt he was doing this as a troll. 

Which leaves us in a circle of doubt and suspicions.

Tony starting the thread lends only a tiny amount of credibility to it (only a tiny amount because of the rumor, not Tony's cred.) But seriously, doesn't every rumor in every situation in every context leave the OH in a circle of doubt and suspicions? ?

 

It's what we do here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

True story, about 12 years after the Mayflower incident, I  relocated from Severna Park to Rolla Missouri on my own, literally Uhaul. About 2 years late I had to relocate from the mid-West to southern VA and the cheapest Company-sponsored option was Mayflower. I refused to use them and paid the difference out of pocket. I would do it a hundred times over and I hope Jim Ersay burns in eternal damnation!  rant over

So you refused a cheaper, better option because the people at Mayflower...did their job on a snowy night 12 years earlier?  I get the hate for Ersay but Mayflower just did their job.  

old.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

So you refused a cheaper, better option because the people at Mayflower...did their job on a snowy night 12 years earlier?  I get the hate for Ersay but Mayflower just did their job.  

 

I stopped celebrating Thanksgiving because of Mayflower.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...