Jump to content

Where’s the call-ups?


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, John Welch said:

Yea, no.

You and I disagree. No big deal.

The kids in the minors are well aware this is a business. 

I think at least some of the kids in the minors bought into the lines that Elias was spouting.  I know a fair number of folks on the hangout seemed to.

Mountcastle not being promoted has NOTHING to do with his defense or walk rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, John Welch said:

I'm curious how you know that.

Because the best way to improve his defense and strike zone judgement would be to promote him to the majors so he can continue to work on it now that the AAA season is over.  The second best way would be to send him to the AFL.  The third best way would be to send him to winter league ball.  The fourth would be to send him down to instructs.

They don't appear to be doing any of that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because the best way to improve his defense and strike zone judgement would be to promote him to the majors so he can continue to work on it now that the AAA season is over.  The second best way would be to send him to the AFL.  The third best way would be to send him to winter league ball.  The fourth would be to send him down to instructs.

They don't appear to be doing any of that.

 

Or send him home with instructions. 

Most of these guys work out all offseason. 

I don't know why they didn't bring him up but I'm positive they know the player better than I do. If it's solely a service time decision, I don't disagree with that in the slightest. The lack of walks is often an issue for a player coming to MLB. Being below average at any defensive position seems like an issue. 

I trust Elias has a well thought out plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Fair enough. My own feeling is that with effective drafting, we are always going to have guys in the system preparing to replace the guys we have on the big team. Much has been made of Mountcastle’s defensive limitations, and the need to find him a place to play. It is probable that in, say, four years, we will have better players and we can trade Mountcastle.

I think one thing the team should adopt is never keeping a player All the way to free agency. Either extend him or trade him after four.

Even with your plan, players have greater trade value when they have an extra year to go before free agency.    It makes all the business sense in the world to have Mountcastle under control for 6 years, 160+ days as opposed to 6 years period.

I am not worried that Mountcastle will be discouraged or have hurt feelings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, John Welch said:

Or send him home with instructions. 

Most of these guys work out all offseason. 

I don't know why they didn't bring him up but I'm positive they know the player better than I do. If it's solely a service time decision, I don't disagree with that in the slightest. The lack of walks is often an issue for a player coming to MLB. Being below average at any defensive position seems like an issue. 

I trust Elias has a well thought out plan. 

Which would be not as good as the other options.

How is he going to work on his strike zone judgement at home? 

I'm sure Elias has a well thought out plan.  I never said otherwise, you are rather obviously trying to deflect from the topic you wanted to discuss. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Even with your plan, players have greater trade value when they have an extra year to go before free agency.    It makes all the business sense in the world to have Mountcastle under control for 6 years, 160+ days as opposed to 6 years period.

I am not worried that Mountcastle will be discouraged or have hurt feelings.  

Depends on the player.  Do you think Schoops' trade value was higher last year because of the extra year of service time?

If you promote them early next year they are going to be super 2's and a lot of players would get non-tendered before being paid super 2 money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Which would be not as good as the other options.

How is he going to work on his strike zone judgement at home? 

I'm sure Elias has a well thought out plan.  I never said otherwise, you are rather obviously trying to deflect from the topic you wanted to discuss. 

 

I think you're a little more passionate about this than I am. I'm not trying to deflect anything but I didn't intend to start an argument either. 

I'll leave the rest to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Depends on the player.  Do you think Schoops' trade value was higher last year because of the extra year of service time?

Of course I do.   Better to have the option of keeping the player for an extra year, even if you don’t end up using it.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I don't.  I think the Brewers traded for him intending to non-tender him at the end of the season.  

I don’t think they had predetermined anything.   Schoop played poorly for them and that was that.   I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that they’d have non-tendered him if he’d played well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

And delay the date we can call him up next year without incurring a full year of service time. 

If they think service time is an issue for Mountcastle, I'm fine with that. I don't think it should be. But if they are concerned about it they could  offer him a long-term deal that guarantees his earnings in exchange for a year or two of free agency before bringing him up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...