Jump to content

2019-2020 Free Agency


backwardsk

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

True, not awful, but a step down from his 2017 season, and throw in 2016 too.

Has he peaked and this is new baseline norm?

Maybe / Maybe not, time will tell.

I would take him on a 1 year deal, but long term and price range, would be a concern.

I agree.   And to be clear, we’re talking generally, not about the Orioles, right?    Because I don’t see the Orioles going after him in any event.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I agree.   And to be clear, we’re talking generally, not about the Orioles, right?    Because I don’t see the Orioles going after him in any event.  

Correct, I agree with your assessment of the situation. He will land anywhere but Oriole Land, unless he does something crazy like offer to play here for league min, which has the probability of happening, like hell freezing over.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Bumgarner's 5/85 has $15M in deferrals, and Hazen expressed gratitude at the press conference for his flexibility on structure.

MLB Network has a Rosenthal tweet saying deferrals are in middle 3 years and annual payouts are: 6/19/23/23/14.

I just looked at Diamondbacks long term and Mike Leake's 5/80 in its final year seems to be awfully close in raw dollars to Bumgarner's given it is a 4-year old contract.  Diamondbacks only owe Leake 6 of this year's 15, but they are paying 10 of Greinke's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Milwaukee has been extremely active this offseason. 

New players they've added:

Mathias - traded from CLE
Urias - traded from SDP
Lauer - traded from SDP
Yardley - traded from SDP
Narvaez - traded from SEA
Rodriguez - traded from DET
Garcia - free agency (2/20)
Healy - free agency (1 yr)
Sogard - free agency (1/4.5)
Smoak - free agency (1/5)
Anderson - free agency (1/5) 
Lindblom - free agency (3/9) 

Plus minor league deals for Broxton, Grimm, and Peterson.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
    • Gunnar doing a good job of hitting the ball to all fields.
    • Tell me the cost and I would probably sign up. What about you Qauntrill, Scherzer and Yates and you got to keep all top 4 prospects?
    • I’ll take them all. Skubal, Crochet, and Mason Miller. At least.  
    • Btw, i understand what he could mean to the team. He could put a ring on our fingers if he can be healthy and be there where and when we need him in October.    That’s the conundrum.
    • It’s just the up and down roles. I agree the opener aspect is the best way to go(to keep him on routine) but you are going to go from pitching 1-3 innings and then hoping he can go 5-6 again, when he is already likely to wear down because of the total workload. It’s all a big risk. I mean, there is a reason he has whatever deal with the WS he has and that if they went against that, he wanted an extension. Even he understands that it’s a risk.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...