Jump to content

2019 #3 Prospect DL Hall - LHP


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Philip said:

So about command...assume for a moment that it never changes.

what then? We’ve had successful pitchers who walked a lot of guys. But he wouldn’t be TOR and probably wouldn’t be a reliable reliever either, would he?

but still he could be a valuable contributor right?

Command isn’t throwing strikes, that’s control. Hall is enough of a strikethrower to be a reliable reliever without improvements. He’d just throw more fastballs since he’d only see hitters once.

No improvements would be a really low percentile outcome, because he’s young, moves well, and is athletic. He wouldn’t even be draft eligible yet if he went to college.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Another team’s scout’s take on Hall:

“Hall’s ceiling is really high because he is more athletic [than Rodriguez] and he is left-handed. Hall seems really motivated to be good and to be a big leaguer. I think he is almost too driven. He does everything 110 percent. His tempo and delivery at times can be a little too fast.

“But in terms of his pitches, he’ll flash you plusses across the board. But he doesn’t always have the body control and is not always in synch on the mound. He’ll yank a pitch to the glove side and then overcompensate the other way. It can impact his command and hurt his consistency. He’s very coachable, but sometimes can almost try too hard. But it’s hard to find athleticism in left-handed pitchers like him.

“He showed 94 to 96 with a real plus changeup and good arm speed and nice arm-side life. His curve was scraping 80 mph and he threw it with real power. I like Rodriguez better, but still like Hall quite a bit.”

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/12/part-two-a-scouts-take-on-os-prospects.html

Overall, you have to like the comments on both pitchers.    

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to re-start a debate that isn't really a debate...

but I think Hall is the guy I want for the future, whereas Rodriguez might be the guy I want starting a game tomorrow. That scout's opinion was interesting. Looks like Hall is essentially less physically (probably better said as mechanically) mature. It's not a given that he gains that body control and consistency of mechanics to develop much better command, but I'm less worried about it than I would be a 25 year old, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

Not to re-start a debate that isn't really a debate...

but I think Hall is the guy I want for the future, whereas Rodriguez might be the guy I want starting a game tomorrow. That scout's opinion was interesting. Looks like Hall is essentially less physically (probably better said as mechanically) mature. It's not a given that he gains that body control and consistency of mechanics to develop much better command, but I'm less worried about it than I would be a 25 year old, for example.

I see it this way: both players have high ceilings, but Hall’s is probably a bit higher.    But Rodriguez appears to have the much higher floor.      If Rodriguez’s ceiling is a 9, perhaps Hall’s is 9.5; but if Rodriguez’s floor is a 7, then Hall’s is a 5.    (Caveat: to a large degree, every pitcher has a floor of zero.    But you know what I’m saying.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious as to how these two compare as prospects to Arietta et. al when when they were of similar ages/levels. I was not following our minor league system closely back then. 
 

In other words, is this the highest upside (and I stress upside) PAIR of starters we’ve had in a long, long time? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, joelala said:

Curious as to how these two compare as prospects to Arietta et. al when when they were of similar ages/levels. I was not following our minor league system closely back then. 
 

In other words, is this the highest upside (and I stress upside) PAIR of starters we’ve had in a long, long time? 

Matt Riley?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joelala said:

Curious as to how these two compare as prospects to Arietta et. al when when they were of similar ages/levels. I was not following our minor league system closely back then. 
 

In other words, is this the highest upside (and I stress upside) PAIR of starters we’ve had in a long, long time? 

Bundy and Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joelala said:

Curious as to how these two compare as prospects to Arietta et. al when when they were of similar ages/levels. I was not following our minor league system closely back then. 
 

In other words, is this the highest upside (and I stress upside) PAIR of starters we’ve had in a long, long time? 

 

15 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

Matt Riley?

Reading comprehension?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joelala said:

Curious as to how these two compare as prospects to Arietta et. al when when they were of similar ages/levels. I was not following our minor league system closely back then. 
 

In other words, is this the highest upside (and I stress upside) PAIR of starters we’ve had in a long, long time? 

 

25 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Bundy and Harvey.

We had Matusz, Tillman and Arrieta all in our system in 2009.    The first two might not seem to have high upsides in hindsight, but Arrieta was ranked behind them at the time.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

We had Matusz, Tillman and Arrieta all in our system in 2009.    The first two might not seem to have high upsides in hindsight, but Arrieta was ranked behind them at the time.   

Ooo yea, forgot about Matusz. 
 

Also forgot how elite of a prospect Bundy was. And then Gausman. I guess Bundy and Gausman easily rivals this pair. Aaaand I’ve successfully tempered my own expectations!

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

Another team’s scout’s take on Hall:

“Hall’s ceiling is really high because he is more athletic [than Rodriguez] and he is left-handed. Hall seems really motivated to be good and to be a big leaguer. I think he is almost too driven. He does everything 110 percent. His tempo and delivery at times can be a little too fast.

“But in terms of his pitches, he’ll flash you plusses across the board. But he doesn’t always have the body control and is not always in synch on the mound. He’ll yank a pitch to the glove side and then overcompensate the other way. It can impact his command and hurt his consistency. He’s very coachable, but sometimes can almost try too hard. But it’s hard to find athleticism in left-handed pitchers like him.

“He showed 94 to 96 with a real plus changeup and good arm speed and nice arm-side life. His curve was scraping 80 mph and he threw it with real power. I like Rodriguez better, but still like Hall quite a bit.”

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/12/part-two-a-scouts-take-on-os-prospects.html

Overall, you have to like the comments on both pitchers.    

 Wasn’t Rodriguez picked in the top 10? Eight or nine? I really don’t think the Orioles have to worry about their draft pick being number one or number two. I think there’s going to be good guys usually in the first dozen or so choices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Philip said:

 Wasn’t Rodriguez picked in the top 10? Eight or nine? I really don’t think the Orioles have to worry about their draft pick being number one or number two. I think there’s going to be good guys usually in the first dozen or so choices. 

No, Rodriguez was 11th.    And many people preferred others in that spot at the time.   The pick looks extremely good so far, but we’re still years away from knowing how he’ll pan out.    

Here’s the reaction to the Rodriguez pick at the time:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No, Rodriguez was 11th.    And many people preferred others in that spot at the time.   The pick looks extremely good so far, but we’re still years away from knowing how he’ll pan out.    

Here’s the reaction to the Rodriguez pick at the time:

 

 

I wanted Logan Gilbert. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I thought you were taking about his hitting in high leverage situations. 
    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...