Jump to content

Calling Elias incompetent is unfair


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Did I get this right, Villar is traded? Makes me chuckle after reading time after time by some that Elias can do nothing good and he will let him walk. 

 

It will be a long hard time the coming years to watch the O's but I have all the faith in Elias that he will make us a force to be record with again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JanJaap said:

Did I get this right, Villar is traded? Makes me chuckle after reading time after time by some that Elias can do nothing good and he will let him walk. 

 

It will be a long hard time the coming years to watch the O's but I have all the faith in Elias that he will make us a force to be record with again. 

I don’t think it’ll do much to tamp down the main thing people are mad about which is hurting the on-field product to further reduce payroll below what already a low payroll number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

I don’t think it’ll do much to tamp down the main thing people are mad about which is hurting the on-field product to further reduce payroll below what already a low payroll number. 

Elias probably finished subtracting.   Now its time to add.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2019 at 12:03 PM, Roll Tide said:

Ok .....the part time years wouldn't matter because he's a full time player no matter where he goes. I doubt he's going to sign somewhere that he has not the start. I keep seeing  the Reds or Phillies to be their leadoff man.

The money is only an issue if you don't consider the 80-100 million that they've already cut is enough. The payroll would be almost not for bad luck with Cobb and Davis' which can only be blamed on Peter for negotiationing against himself. We've discussed at nausea the national and MASN tv right share covering a 150-160 million dollar payroll. I used 110 plus 60 million (National Share + MASN) in the past (published numbers) but want to avoid another lengthy discussion about it. And I don't believe that takes into account the additional money that they got /will get for being a low revenue team. 

I agree ... if you read my other posts criticizing Elias

He played card 1 just after the deadline "Felt no pressure to deal as he had no pending free agents"

and Card 2  (Interview with the Baltimore Sun) "Not payout Villar 10 million to pay on a team he wants /hopes/ or will lose 100 games.

Do you think Card 2 helped Villar's trade value? 

I think Card #1 is more accurate.  You don't really have to deal when you have a losing team...  And that plays into Card #2 which is not really different than Card #1 by that much in our situation.  That's 10 Million that I'm sure Elias feels he can better utilize than paying a player (he might like- and I think he does - he's an Astros pick). 

I look at it this way.  Villar despite our disagreement about full-time play, has never really garnered "enthusiasm" in the full-time roles he's had.  Look at Milwaukee... he was on the verge of being benched in a 3-way rotation.

He has a great year, earns a good paycheck, no doubt.  Is it possible that Elias tried to do him a solid and find a trade partner where he'd at least be utilized knowing all along they would never offer him what he was due, try to get a decent return on him in the process, while trying to allow Jonathan to potentially flourish on a team that might compete?  When there were no suitors, I think the die was cast.  They were never going to spend 10 Million on the guy.  Period.

"Sorry Jonathan.  We tried to do something good for both of us, but you'll have to go it alone."  is what I think the result of no suitors in trade talks was and then waiving him.  I don't think it was incompetence by any stretch.  The chips fell that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2019 at 8:26 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Because you wouldn't have to compete for his services.  This way you could pay a nominal fee in prospects to insure he's playing for you.  Like Oakland did with Jim Johnson.

...but this is assuming a team values him at the 10M price tag...  Clearly they don't as he still hasn't signed as a FA.

I get what you're saying and I agree, generally.  But Jonathan, as much as we all liked him on our lackluster team, is not a highly sought after guy.  Teams are looking to fill his role with guys they are developing or at a cheaper price point.  This is why Milwaukee sent us him and not one of the other two guys they had in the rotation when they were trying to find their infield before trading for Schoop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

...but this is assuming a team values him at the 10M price tag...  Clearly they don't as he still hasn't signed as a FA.

I get what you're saying and I agree, generally.  But Jonathan, as much as we all liked him on our lackluster team, is not a highly sought after guy.  Teams are looking to fill his role with guys they are developing or at a cheaper price point.  This is why Milwaukee sent us him and not one of the other two guys they had in the rotation when they were trying to find their infield before trading for Schoop.

They didn’t want to take on Schoop’s salary and be paying Villar at the same time, when he wasn’t going to play.    Shaw was hitting better and making the minimum.     

Simple fact is, Villar played better for us than he did for Milwaukee in 2017-18.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

I think Card #1 is more accurate.  You don't really have to deal when you have a losing team...  And that plays into Card #2 which is not really different than Card #1 by that much in our situation.  That's 10 Million that I'm sure Elias feels he can better utilize than paying a player (he might like- and I think he does - he's an Astros pick). 

I look at it this way.  Villar despite our disagreement about full-time play, has never really garnered "enthusiasm" in the full-time roles he's had.  Look at Milwaukee... he was on the verge of being benched in a 3-way rotation.

He has a great year, earns a good paycheck, no doubt.  Is it possible that Elias tried to do him a solid and find a trade partner where he'd at least be utilized knowing all along they would never offer him what he was due, try to get a decent return on him in the process, while trying to allow Jonathan to potentially flourish on a team that might compete?  When there were no suitors, I think the die was cast.  They were never going to spend 10 Million on the guy.  Period.

"Sorry Jonathan.  We tried to do something good for both of us, but you'll have to go it alone."  is what I think the result of no suitors in trade talks was and then waiving him.  I don't think it was incompetence by any stretch.  The chips fell that way.

So I think you are pretty close on this.

Villar was a 3.9 WAR player in 2016. He had a bad year in 2017 (.1). I assume the was where he was almost benched from the 3 Way, 1.4 Brewers and 1.3 Orioles =2.7 In 2018 and 4.0 in 2019. 
 

Perhaps he’s not good at being a part time player. I’ve known a lot of guys that aren’t any good at watching 2,3,4 days per week. Some guts really struggle at DH due to not playing in the field.

The reason for the .1 WAR ? Sophomore Jinx? I have no idea.

 

 H

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They didn’t want to take on Schoop’s salary and be paying Villar at the same time, when he wasn’t going to play.    Shaw was hitting better and making the minimum.     

Simple fact is, Villar played better for us than he did for Milwaukee in 2017-18.
 

...but it's why he was expendable, is my point.  He was the most expensive of the modest rotation they had going.  So they traded for a guy to deliver more at a higher price point while off-loading their most expensive player in their rotation.  It's simple math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

So I think you are pretty close on this.

Villar was a 3.9 WAR player in 2016. He had a bad year in 2017 (.1). I assume the was where he was almost benched from the 3 Way, 1.4 Brewers and 1.3 Orioles =2.7 In 2018 and 4.0 in 2019. 
 

Perhaps he’s not good at being a part time player. I’ve known a lot of guys that aren’t any good at watching 2,3,4 days per week. Some guts really struggle at DH due to not playing in the field.

The reason for the .1 WAR ? Sophomore Jinx? I have no idea.

 

 H

...but the point here is there are guys who are coming up on all teams and available veterans (like Villar) that might deliver those kinds of WAR numbers where the team wouldn't have to pay 10 Million/yr for the numbers.  He's priced out of the market at that amount.  Ryan Flaherty is available... I jest, yet, as much as I like Jonathan the only guy paying him the calibrated paycheck is Peter Angelos of old because, "...well, the fans seem to like him and he may get some asses in the seats."

Thank god those days are over!  At least I hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

...but the point here is there are guys who are coming up on all teams and available veterans (like Villar) that might deliver those kinds of WAR numbers where the team wouldn't have to pay 10 Million/yr for the numbers.  He's priced out of the market at that amount.  Ryan Flaherty is available... I jest, yet, as much as I like Jonathan the only guy paying him the calibrated paycheck is Peter Angelos of old because, "...well, the fans seem to like him and he may get some asses in the seats."

Thank god those days are over!  At least I hope.

Flaherty isn't available.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

...but the point here is there are guys who are coming up on all teams and available veterans (like Villar) that might deliver those kinds of WAR numbers where the team wouldn't have to pay 10 Million/yr for the numbers.  He's priced out of the market at that amount.  Ryan Flaherty is available... I jest, yet, as much as I like Jonathan the only guy paying him the calibrated paycheck is Peter Angelos of old because, "...well, the fans seem to like him and he may get some asses in the seats."

Thank god those days are over!  At least I hope.

Flaherty is a .6 WAR player over seven seasons. So really its apples and Oranges. Look I know Villar was moved over the projected arb number and the fact the the Orioles will be lucky to win 50 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • weams locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...