Jump to content

Easton Lucas vs. Griffin Conine


Frobby

Recommended Posts

It’s definitely water under the bridge, but I am inclined to think that Toronto made a dumb trade. I don’t really think it’s relevant to compare the returns because the circumstances are different. I don’t think the guy we got back it’s going to be a superstar for us, I’m not even sure he’ll ever see the big team, but he was the best we could get at the time, and if we had kept him I’m pretty sure he would not have earned his pay nor brought back the same kind of return for us. Also if we had kept him, we would not have signed Iglesias, who is a far better all-around player.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Philip said:

It’s definitely water under the bridge, but I am inclined to think that Toronto made a dumb trade. I don’t really think it’s relevant to compare the returns because the circumstances are different. I don’t think the guy we got back it’s going to be a superstar for us, I’m not even sure he’ll ever see the big team, but he was the best we could get at the time, and if we had kept him I’m pretty sure he would not have earned his pay nor brought back the same kind of return for us. Also if we had kept him, we would not have signed Iglesias, who is a far better all-around player.

I pretty much love this post. Good analysis!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Also if we had kept him, we would not have signed Iglesias, who is a far better all-around player.

Very different players, and yet Iglesias has been worth 11.5 rWAR, Villar 11.1.    They’ve played a very similar number of games.   

What we’ve seen of Iglesias in his 20 games with us is not representative.    He’s not nearly the caliber of hitter than he’s looked like for us.    And his typical defense is actually better than we’ve seen, because he’s been dealing with leg issues all season.  

I think what’s definitely fair to say is that Iglesias is more your style of player — good defensively, consistent, makes the smart play.   Villar has way more offensive talent but makes more mental mistakes.   

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Very different players, and yet Iglesias has been worth 11.5 rWAR, Villar 11.1.    They’ve played a very similar number of games.   

What we’ve seen of Iglesias in his 20 games with us is not representative.    He’s not nearly the caliber of hitter than he’s looked like for us.    And his typical defense is actually better than we’ve seen, because he’s been dealing with leg issues all season.  

I think what’s definitely fair to say is that Iglesias is more your style of player — good defensively, consistent, makes the smart play.   Villar has way more offensive talent but makes more mental mistakes.   

 

That’s all true. But if we had kept Villar we wouldn’t have signed Iglesias.

Iglesias is a much more reliable player, and I would rather have him even if he were hitting.220. Periodic brilliance is less desirable than consistent excellence. Iglesias’ absence probably cost us at least three games on defense alone, and the opposite can probably be said of Villar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the name of that first baseman that we traded a bonus slot for that was like 24 years old in rookie ball and got released? It turned out the bonus slot trade was a PTBNL-type move, but posters here mocked DD a lot for that one.

Easton Lucas is the new that guy. Not a good return for a 4 WAR player. Elias seems like a competent trader, but he didn't do well with that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, luismatos4prez said:

What was the name of that first baseman that we traded a bonus slot for that was like 24 years old in rookie ball and got released? It turned out the bonus slot trade was a PTBNL-type move, but posters here mocked DD a lot for that one.

Easton Lucas is the new that guy. Not a good return for a 4 WAR player. Elias seems like a competent trader, but he didn't do well with that one.

You don't know Jack?

It was also an illegal move.  Dan is lucky the franchise didn't get punished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am fine with what ME did in reducing payroll and moving Villar.

IMO, the biggest issue in play here is less about $ and more about production. 

ME traded a 3.9 WAR, 109 OPS+ Villar for very little to avoid paying an arbitration salary.

The Jays just traded a high quality prospect for the 0.0 WAR, 90 OPS+ (granted, production after five weeks) Villar.  

Kudos to the Marlins for what they pulled off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hoosiers said:

I am fine with what ME did in reducing payroll and moving Villar.

IMO, the biggest issue in play here is less about $ and more about production. 

ME traded a 3.9 WAR, 109 OPS+ Villar for very little to avoid paying an arbitration salary.

The Jays just traded a high quality prospect for the 0.0 WAR, 90 OPS+ (granted, production after five weeks) Villar.  

Kudos to the Marlins for what they pulled off.  

I'm not sure 128 PA should change everything we know about the player to this point...

And state of the world was different when we traded. There weren't 16 teams making the playoffs, wasn't an expectant playoff team with a positional need, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, hoosiers said:

I am fine with what ME did in reducing payroll and moving Villar.

IMO, the biggest issue in play here is less about $ and more about production. 

ME traded a 3.9 WAR, 109 OPS+ Villar for very little to avoid paying an arbitration salary.

The Jays just traded a high quality prospect for the 0.0 WAR, 90 OPS+ (granted, production after five weeks) Villar.  

Kudos to the Marlins for what they pulled off.  

Is Conine really a high quality prospect?  He struck out 36% of the time in low A ball.  When Ryan Mountcastle was in low A he was two years younger and struck out 19% of the time, and plate discipline is his biggest weakness.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Is Conine really a high quality prospect?  He struck out 36% of the time in low A ball.  When Ryan Mountcastle was in low A he was two years younger and struck out 19% of the time, and plate discipline is his biggest weakness.

I've been thinking the same thing. He has hit for power at Duke and in the low minors, but that's about it. Nothing else seems really that overwhelming, other than his strikeouts.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, lovetoaster said:

I've been thinking the same thing. He has hit for power at Duke and in the low minors, but that's about it. Nothing else seems really that overwhelming, other than his strikeouts.  

I'd like to hear a scout's perspective, because I think it's highly unlikely that a guy who has Chris Davis' strikeout rate in low-A is going to make enough contact to do anything at the major league level.

When Davis was in low A he struck out 23% of the time, and he was a year younger than Conine who struck out 36%.  Mark Reynolds struck out 23% of the time in low A.  Ronald Acuna led the majors in Ks last year, when he was in the Sally League he was 18(!) and struck out just 28 times in 171 PAs.  Eugenio Suarez was 2nd, he struck out 19% of the time in low A at 20.

Conine is going to make Russell Branyan look like Hanser Alberto.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fine with the Villar trade last year, it opened up the ability for us to sign Iglesias.  I liked Villar but I think we got a career-ish year out of him.  I didn't think he could replicate what he did last year, this year so I believe Elias traded him at the best time.

There are questions about Easton Lucas, there are questions about Griffin Conine.  Neither one are surefire prospects.  It's all good. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Is Conine really a high quality prospect?  He struck out 36% of the time in low A ball.  When Ryan Mountcastle was in low A he was two years younger and struck out 19% of the time, and plate discipline is his biggest weakness.

Per Fangraphs (EL), he's the 20th best (of 32) prospects to trade hands for the 2020 deadline.

For comparison, they have Vavra at #2, Nevin at #10, and Smith at #16. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Per Fangraphs (EL), he's the 20th best (of 32) prospects to trade hands for the 2020 deadline.

For comparison, they have Vavra at #2, Nevin at #10, and Smith at #16. 

"huge power and scary strikeouts."

I wonder if there's anyone who ever cut their strikeout rate from low-A to the majors.  Conine almost has to, unless he's going to have a .430 BABIP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A RH power bat to stick somewhere in the 3-4-5 slots. I would see what the Giants might want in a trade for Heliot Ramos. He hit .370 / .439 / .750 against LH pitchers this year, and would look awesome in the middle of all our lefty batters.  
    • Early in the offseason and my opinions may change, but here are my thoughts at this time. 1st - I'm ready to move on from Mountcastle.  And O'Hearn should only be a platoon option.  I hope we sign someone like a Alonso or Walker who doesn't have massive L/R splits and who can play on a daily basis, regardless of who is on the mound, and make both Ryans expendable, and we trade them for whatever we can get.  Otherwise we probably keep the platoon going, with the Ryan's splitting based on the SP.  Unfortunately Mayo hasn't show anything in the majors to make me think he's ready to be a regular in the lineup yet.  That could change in the spring, but right now we can't plan on him. 2nd - This is Holidays spot to start the season.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot.  Holiday didn't earn it by his play, but his pedigree and the money/time invested into him will give him a pretty long leash, for good or bad.  If he falters Westburg may be moved off of 3rd to play here instead. SS - Gunnar is here.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot. 3rd - Westburg.  He should hold this spot down unless Holiday struggles, and then he might be moved over the 2nd.  We don't bring in any real competition for this spot. Util - I don't like it, but I expect us to keep both Mateo and Urias, though I'm not 100% sure if we think Mateo will be ready for OD.  If Mateo isn't expected to be ready then I can see us bringing in someone for this role, though I'm not sure who off the top of my head. C - Adley has this spot, though if we are going to continue to keep his load light, we need a GOOD backup.  And after Adleys struggles the 2nd half of the season, I'm even more concerned about the quality of the backup than I was before this year started.  I'm just not sure how many GOOD backups exist, and any of the really good catchers are going to want to start more than they would here.  I'm not sure Basallo is ready for MLB time, and after the struggles with Mayo and Holiday, we surely can't count on him even if he is on the mlb roster.  McCann could come back...I don't love that idea, but I could see it happening. OF - We start with Mullins, Cowser and Kjerstad, don't try to resign Santander unless he take the QO.  I'd LOVE to see us bring in someone good here (Soto would rock, but clearly isn't going to happen) maybe Pederson or Hernandez or something.  Spend a bit of money here and get someone who has a decent bat. So upgrade 1st base with a non-platoon player and bring in a good vet in the OF.  Say goodbye to the Ryans and Santander. Pitching - I'd love to sign a #1 like Burnes or Snell, but I think they get more years and money than we are willing to go.  I can see us being in on a Max Fried or Jack Flahertyt.  Also possible to see some of the lesser guys, the Andrew Heaneys of the world. Bullpen - I expect to see a few journeyman/low level signings.  With the controllable players we traded for this year and what is returning I don't see us signing anyone big for the bullpen.  
    • I think it’s pretty natural for kids to take special notice of the guys with speed who make exciting plays like steals and triples and defensive “web gems.” Seems like the kids now are higher on guys like Mateo and Mullins than the grownups, and I think that was the case with Brian Roberts back in the day too. As for clutch, in going through some of the clutch numbers, one guy who stood out as a possible fit for us is Alex Bregman. He has a career 144 wRC+ with runners on base and a .294 BA with RISP — I tend to care a little more about BA when a hit scores a run. His postseason heroics are also pretty well-known. Not sure what you’d have to pay him, and I’m pretty sure signing him would necessitate the Holliday-to-CF move. But if they’re not willing to play in the Soto sandbox financially, Bregman would be a veteran guy with championship pedigree and (importantly) ties to Mike/Sig that could put him near the top of their list. 
    • Just to be as clear as possible, when they were doing better early in the season, they were swinging more, not less. 4/1 - 6/30: 7.2 BB%, 49.3% swing rate, 29.8% out of zone swing rate, 22.2% whiff rate, .316 OBP 7/1 - 9/30: 8.7 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.0% out of zone swing rate, 22.4% whiff rate, .315 OBP 2023: 8.4 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.9% out of zone swing rate, 23.0% whiff rate, .321 OBP They took less walks early in the year, they swung more often at both balls and strikes early in the year, and their OBP/whiff rates were essentially identical in both halves.  The notion that they turned into free-swinging hackers in the second half — and that’s why they failed — seems to be pretty commonly held here, but it’s not backed by any data. They were actually more patient at the plate in this season’s second half than they’ve ever been during the Adley era.
    • Meant to say I wouldn't mind him managing the Orioles. I always liked him as a manager. 
    • It is a foolish hope to expect a full season out of Rodriguez. Kremer is fine, and I’m glad to have him. Suarez was better in most meaningful stats, but we don’t know what Suarez is going to do. He could possibly be just a flash in the pan. Povich is trade or depth. We need depth. Our 2025 -ready pitchers all have potential problems. but now we also need outfielders and infielders
    • A very good move as long as he is healthy. Surprised he wanted to come back. I would had mind here. A HOF manager
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...