Jump to content

#27 2020 Prospect: Ryan McKenna - CF/LF


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

While I wouldn’t have had him here, I’m glad to see him rated “low”.

 

There hasn’t been a more overhyped prospect in the organization than him in recent years (at least in many other sites). Maybe he can be a back up OFer but he is no more than that and even that may be stretch if he can’t hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

That .377 average in a half season at Frederick after a solid second half at Delmarva the year before sure looked good.    Hard to believe that .377 at high A became a .230 at Double A.   There's gotta be something in there somewhere.

Or the 377 was a big fluke.  
 

I think he finds his way onto a ML roster if the reports are true that he is an excellent fielder and has good speed.  With the 26th man now in play, there is room for that player on the team and you shouldn’t have to pay anything more than the league minimum for that production.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

That .377 average in a half season at Frederick after a solid second half at Delmarva the year before sure looked good.    Hard to believe that .377 at high A became a .230 at Double A.   There's gotta be something in there somewhere.

I used to think that too until Xavier Avery lit the world on fire for a while.

When you're hot in baseball, you're hot. You can put up stats really fast. You need to be able to 1) sustain it against the same competition and 2) do it as the competition gets harder. McKenna hasn't done either. 

I know I keep mentioning Yaz, but absent a Yaz-like hitting profile change, I just don't see it with this kid. I wish I did because his speed is off the charts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

That .377 average in a half season at Frederick after a solid second half at Delmarva the year before sure looked good.    Hard to believe that .377 at high A became a .230 at Double A.   There's gotta be something in there somewhere.

Small sample batting averages, or value spikes driven by out-of-character batting averages, come with big flashing caution lights. 

Remember Harry Berrios?  Probably not, I may be the only one.  He hit .342 in A ball in the O's system in '94.  Never got higher than AA before going to the indy leagues.  Mike Berry was from the same era, hit .362 for the High Desert Mavericks the year they were an O's affiliate in '96.  .748 OPS in AAA, never played in the majors.  Ty Kelly hit .346 for the Keys in '12.  Career in the majors of a .611 OPS.  Robbie Widlansky once hit .340 for the Keys.  Kipp Schutz hit .381 for couple months for the Shorebirds in '11.  Yermin Mercedes hit .353 for the Shorebirds in '16, he's now 27 and 0-for-1 in the majors.

You probably get that I'm skeptical of crazy batting averages in the minors.  Take out McKenna's 300 PAs of a .377 and his career average is .240-something.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His tools are what keeps him on the list for me, particular since he brings a solid set of defensive tools. There is raw power in the bat and he taps into on occasion. Saying that, he's got a lot to prove at the upper levels to prove that Frederick season wasn't a fluke.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

While I wouldn’t have had him here, I’m glad to see him rated “low”.

 

There hasn’t been a more overhyped prospect in the organization than him in recent years (at least in many other sites). Maybe he can be a back up OFer but he is no more than that and even that may be stretch if he can’t hit.

Jomar Reyes would like a word.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Or the 377 was a big fluke.  
 

I think he finds his way onto a ML roster if the reports are true that he is an excellent fielder and has good speed.  With the 26th man now in play, there is room for that player on the team and you shouldn’t have to pay anything more than the league minimum for that production.  

The .377 was a fluke.  But he did also hit .344 in the AFL that Fall, too.   Do I think he’s a potential .300+ hitter as a major leaguer?   Not at all.    But a guy who can play a solid major league CF doesn’t have to hit a ton to be a useful player.    His career MiL line of .264/.350/.387 would do the trick just fine if he could pull that off in the majors.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...