Jump to content

Jose Iglesias traded to Angels.


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

So when do we get to the building part of rebuilding?

This still looks like the tearing down part.

I thought it would be now...

But apparently somebody waving the smell of new pitchers in front of Elias was too much for him.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, owknows said:

Pat Valaika is not an everyday player because no one has played him everyday yet.

Sanchez has limited reps because he hasn't has the reps yet.

Valaika actually has a fine fielding pct at 2B... and will hit 30+ homers

Bannon at 3B

This is the rebuilding Orioles

You are looking at this much different than me. 

There are reasons why these players didn’t have those chances or played those positions. 
 

Once again long term next year may not matter but this isn’t good to see.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, owknows said:

Is he your best option at the moment?

It is December 2nd.

I think Richie Martin is more likely to be the Opening Day shortstop than Yolmer Sanchez, but I would bet on it being someone currently not in the organization over either of them.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddie83 said:

You are looking at this much different than me. 

There are reasons why these players didn’t have those chances or played those positions. 
 

Once again long term next year may not matter but this isn’t good to see.  

Sometimes those reasons are valid. Sometimes not.

In Valaika's case he has some ML infield innings under his belt... and as long as you keep him away from SS... he's passable...  And he's got enough ML at bats to know he'll hit and hit well.

In Sanchez's case... he's better than Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

It is December 2nd.

I think Richie Martin is more likely to be the Opening Day shortstop than Yolmer Sanchez, but I would bet on it being someone currently not in the organization over either of them.

Entirely possible...  maybe even likely.

But it's more fun to speculate with non-imaginary pieces

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stallings just before Peek and Brnovich that Angels draft class.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?team_ID=ANA&year_ID=2019&draft_type=junreg&query_type=franch_year

His 5th round bonus was in the bottom half of the round, but more than all but a few 6th rounders.

If it was the same Angels GM, I'd say more of one man's trash another's treasure, but this is the new guy.   I guess we have someone liking the same stuff the Angels did that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...