Jump to content

Phillies are a cautionary tale for rebuilding


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

A good autopsy, yet nothing really earth shattering.  

It’s actually not really an indictment on rebuilding persay.

It’s  an indictment on poor drafting an development.

What it is an indictment of rebuilding is that rebuilding doesn’t guarantee you contention.  You still have to do a lot of smart things along the way.  
 

It’s also why you don’t sit back and wait for a magical time to where you start making financial moves just because you are rebuilding.  You can still do many things while also trying to win games.  The Os should be doing that now and they aren’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klentak's free agent signings have been fairly productive - as shown by the article - which is difficult to do.

IMO, the issue with the Phillies is that they did not have the depth of prospects that keep supporting the major league roster that they thought they did.  Hoskins and Nola emerged as very strong players, but they were not enough.  Other prospects have not panned out yet or were overrated - Moniak, Kingery, Williams, etc.  Right now could be a time when Sanchez is supplementing the major league roster when they lose Arrieta.  Instead they traded him.

When the Os were good, we did have Machado as an emerging superstar like Hoskins and Nola, but we also had a much more sizable core of cheap productive players - Wieters, Davis, Tillman, Jones, Britton and others - plus relatively reasonably priced veterans in Markakis and Hardy and others. 

I have posted many times in the past that, in a market like Bmore, perhaps 7-11 of a teams top 17 players - all starting position players and DH, SP1-4 and BP1-4 - should be pre-arb and pre-FA - in order to compete.  That is enough of a foundation to supplement with free agents.  FWIW, I think Elias is building a 2023 team that will be very cheap and should be emerging as quite competitive.

 

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Klentak's free agent signings have been fairly productive - as shown by the article - which is difficult to do.

IMO, the issue with the Phillies is that they did not have the depth of prospects that keep supporting the major league roster that they thought they did.  Hoskins and Nola emerged as very strong players, but they were not enough.  Other prospects have not panned out yet or were overrated - Moniak, Kingery, Williams, etc.  Right now could be a time when Sanchez is supplementing the major league roster when they lose Arrieta.  Instead they traded him.

When the Os were good, we did have Machado as an emerging superstar like Hoskins and Nola, but we also had a much more sizable core of cheap productive players - Wieters, Davis, Tillman, Jones, Britton and others - plus relatively reasonably priced veterans in Markakis and Hardy and others. 

I have posted many times in the past that, in a market like Bmore, perhaps 7-11 of a teams top 17 players - all starting position players and DH, SP1-4 and BP1-4 - should be pre-arb and pre-FA - in order to compete.  That is enough of a foundation to supplement with free agents.  FWIW, I think Elias is building a 2023 team that will be very cheap and should be emerging as quite competitive.

 

 

I have expressed my concertns about Elias, but obviously he understands that you have to have a core of young, cheap players that get to the majors around the same time.  Players that don't fit this timeline are being traded when the time or return is right.  This can make a lot of fans (and me) angry.  I'll be surprised if Mancini remains an Oriole past this year, regardless of his production.  Its probably more likely he's traded, the better he performs.  The O's don't have the deep pockets to acquire multiple top of the line free agents (or at least an owner that is willing to spend in that manner).  If the timing isn't right, even massive spending to the luxury tax won't make you a winning, playoff team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I have expressed my concertns about Elias, but obviously he understands that you have to have a core of young, cheap players that get to the majors around the same time.  Players that don't fit this timeline are being traded when the time or return is right.  This can make a lot of fans (and me) angry.  I'll be surprised if Mancini remains an Oriole past this year, regardless of his production.  Its probably more likely he's traded, the better he performs.  The O's don't have the deep pockets to acquire multiple top of the line free agents (or at least an owner that is willing to spend in that manner).  If the timing isn't right, even massive spending to the luxury tax won't make you a winning, playoff team. 

Mancini could be an ownership test.  Keeping Mancini strikes me as a move Peter would force upon his GM.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/30462167/sources-philadelphia-phillies-open-trade-offers-right-hander-zack-wheeler

In the space of just a few hours, Middleton denouncing the ESPN report on NBC Sports Philadelphia (not sure if that one is a team-owned network ala MASN), but if .500-dom was a local peak, and post-Realmuto the next couple years are bumpy (Mets/Nats pushing tail end of DeGrom/Scherzer, Braves Braves, maybe even Marlins athletes jell some), will Bryce get antsy?   Alec Bohm might save it, but they are on last 3 years of Nola as well (oooh Nola & Bryce July 31, 2023 to stop Dodgers four-peat).   I excluded Jean Segura from the 30 seats of SS Musical Chairs, but he's atop their chart for now, though both old and having started the slide down the Defensive Spectrum already.

The Verlander/Greinke blueprint is the guy paid $25M+ for the long term on some blah team (Cole was just blah not $30M), then you're the Second Buyer:

(a) paying a more equitable $20M while the dumper pays some modest but not insignificant fraction

(b) trading four depth pieces (flirting with the pupu platter) for your Finishing Touches player.

Having married into a Nationals batch of in-laws around the start of his career, latter Bryce becoming a piece like this for Peak Rutschman Orioles teams would be good theater.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, andrewochs615 said:

I do find it kind of funny that it's an Andy Macphail rebuild

Exactly what I was going to say.  Hire Andy MacPhail and your rebuild might take like 12 years.  Does he still believe that all methods of player acquisition (besides maybe at-slot June draft picks) have too low an ROI to use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...