Jump to content

Orioles not likely to bid on Ha-Seong Kim


Roll Tide

Should the Orioles be in on Ha-Seong Kim?  

38 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the Orioles be in on Ha-Seong Kim?



Recommended Posts

From Mewleski via MLBTR.com
 

 

  • Quote

    Since Ha-Seong Kim is only entering his age-25 season, there has been some thought that his market could extend to teams who might still be at least a year away from contending (the Rangers, for example, are known to have interest).  However, MASNsports.com’s Steve Melewski thinks “it sure seems unlikely” that the Orioles will make a bid for Kim since the O’s don’t seem to be planning any major expenditures.  Between contract and posting fee, MLBTR projects Kim to cost around $47.625MM this offseason, so Baltimore may not feel like making such an investment at this stage in its rebuild.

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is as good as any place to take a shot. It’s not as if the deal breaks the bank. He’s young and can be under 30 when we compete. If someone else develops then he can be dealt for other pieces. Adding a top talent that only costs money is desirable. The only con is he might not be what’s being projected. IMO that the risk you take with any free aren’t or international talent. After pissing away money on Davis and Trumbo this gamble would be smaller and the guy plays a premium position 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, to clarify, the initial investment is not $48M.  The expected posting fee is around $8M and the contract is projected at $40M for five years.  So, 2021 cost would be around $15M (assuming some ramp up in the annual contract cost) to $20M if the posting fee goes higher.   This cost seems reasonable for the projected production though we are talking about funds the Os may not be able to afford in 2021.  We could try to move Cobb and Mancini to free up $.  Depends on how we evaluate Kim.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hoosiers said:

So, to clarify, the initial investment is not $48M.  The expected posting fee is around $8M and the contract is projected at $40M for five years.  So, 2021 cost would be around $15M (assuming some ramp up in the annual contract cost) to $20M if the posting fee goes higher.   This cost seems reasonable for the projected production though we are talking about funds the Os may not be able to afford in 2021.  We could try to move Cobb and Mancini to free up $.  Depends on how we evaluate Kim.

What do you think his projected production is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, it’s obvious they won’t bid on him and I think that’s the right call.  Not just based off of what Drungo said but also because the Os have been accumulating a lot of SS/MI type talent.  I don’t see the need to lock into a long term deal and block those guys at this point.  If they aren’t looking like SS or even MLers after this season, go ahead and make a run at one of the SS in next years FA class.

As someone who wants to see a better product on the field, this would be an example of hurting yourself long term to do that.  I don’t want that.

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs' Depth Chart projection has Kim as a .244/.322/.417 hitter, presumably in a neutral MLB context.  Also has him as something like an average MLB shortstop, and overall a 2-win player.  But I don't know how they came up with the defense.  That's what this hinges on: if he can play short in the majors he should be an average regular.  If he's forced to 2b/3b he's a glorified Rio Ruiz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think the downside is Kim averaging. 5 WAR, the likely production around 1-1.5 WAR and perhaps some upside to those numbers.  I would need to see more analysis on Kim to have a more definitive opinion.  Kim is younger and has more upside than the guys in the comps above.  I could see Kim w an OPS around 725-760 w some upside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume they've done their due diligence on him, and given their apparent lack of interest, I would expect the Orioles projections on what he is doesn't merit the cost. To me, based on what little information is available to us, I would say it seems he's most likely to come over and be, at best, a serviceable player. I'm not sure the nearly $50M over five years would make the investment worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jamalshw said:

I would assume they've done their due diligence on him, and given their apparent lack of interest, I would expect the Orioles projections on what he is doesn't merit the cost. To me, based on what little information is available to us, I would say it seems he's most likely to come over and be, at best, a serviceable player. I'm not sure the nearly $50M over five years would make the investment worthwhile.

Right, like when they declined to participate in the Ohtani posting.

The Darvish posting.

The Tanaka posting.

The Ryu posting.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'm glad they're not interested.  

Moving on...

Seconded - I want a better SS even for the early Rutschman teams, and his contract term may go to Peak Rutschman teams.

I'm very much on Tejada: Next Generation and hoping for the Meatloaf 2 out of 3 on Gunnar/Westburg/Mayo in time for the dirt, even if we keep it all on the sidelines until '23 for more info on whether anyone currently in the org can truly handle SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I've mentioned some of these things before, but:

a. Ha-Seong Kim is 25 and has been playing in a league whose overall quality is probably about AA level, with a wider spread in talent and ages.

b. Kim's 2020 was his best season in Korea with a .921 OPS.

c. The KBO's run context is about 5 runs/team/game.  Kiwoom was right in the middle.  About half a run higher than MLB.

d. Byung Ho Park has had OPSes in Korea over 1.000 four times.  In the majors he hit .191/.275/.409.

e. Hyun Soo Kim had almost the same slash line as Ha-Seong Kim in Korea last year and has comparable career numbers.  His MLB OPS was .719.

f. Jose Miguel Fernandez had a .901 OPS in the KBO last year.  His MLB OPS is .697.

g. Roberto Ramos had a .954 OPS for LG at 25 last year.  He had a .980 OPS at high-altitude Albuquerque in '19 but has never played in the majors.

h. Aaron Altherr had an .893 OPS in Korea last year.  His MLB OPS is .708.

To me this looks like a rough translation for a KBO player is to knock off 200 points of OPS or so.  Meaning Ha-Seong Kim is likely a .700ish OPS player.  He's started playing some third base the last few years, so I'm not sure he's a MLB SS.  So I'd be wary of getting into a $50M bidding war for someone who currently looks a bit better than Rio Ruiz, or maybe like Jurickson Profar or David Fletcher.  There may be some upside or growth, but he was about the 11th-best hitter in the KBO in 2020.

So bid what you are willing to go and drop if it gets ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • WBALs Blair Young likes our chances https://www.wbaltv.com/article/do-orioles-have-chance-sign-free-agent-pitcher-corbin-burnes/62512129
    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...