Jump to content

Is Elias leaning toward offense over defense in 2021?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Mike Elias has already stated that 2021 will not be a year to go for it.  The switch will not be flipped this coming season. But what kind of a team is he looking to build for his non contending year?

This off season he has referred to Ryan Mountcastle as a left fielder more than a first baseman.   Hyde often used Austin Hays in left and Cedric Mullins in center last season which gave him a better defensive outfield.  But Elias has  referred to those two as competing centerfielders.    This sound like an offense over defense approach. 

What about Yusniel Diaz?   He has been called close.  Someone that will debut in 2021.  The timing of his call up is unknown and since he has not played AAA yet he will probably begin the season there.  Its will probably be up to him to push his way to the majors.

Mountcastle in left opens first for Mancini.   It also allows two offensive players to compete for DH -- DJ Stewart and Chris Shaw at least until Diaz is promoted.  

Now we hear the hint that Elias may considering Jonathan Villar if the price is right.  Villar's best position is second base.  But second is also defensive minded Yolmer Sanchez best position. Its also Pat Valaika and Ramon Urias best defensive position.    But if they sign Villar it would be for his offense over defense.  It would push the other three toward SS and 3B to find playing time.  Richie Martin, Sanchez and Valaika are all probably better defensive SS than Villar.   Also Elias could acquire more than one infielder.

Villar to the O's is just a rumor.  But Mountcastle in left is something Elias has stated which may make room for Stewart/Shaw.   I have to wonder  whether offense in 2021 will be priorities over defense.   Time will tell.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there’s a lot to be determined before deciding how Mountcastle’s time will get divided between LF, 1B and DH.   I suspect he’ll see time at all three, and how much time he spends at each may depend on the performance of other players as much as it depends on his own performance. It also may depend on whether we are facing a RHP (in which case Mullins may be in CF) or a LHP (in which case Mullins is probably on the bench).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

On the flip side, the team added Yolmer Sanchez to the roster and jettisoned Nunez.

Good point about claiming Sanchez.  The question is what his role will be.   I guess it depends on who else is brought in.  

Nunez was a little different case.  Elias was freeing up playing time for other players that are less expensive  IMO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Why wouldn’t Mountcastle be the starting LFer until Diaz is here.

Why would anyone think differently?

A Hays, Mullins, Santander OF is actually pretty nice defensively. Put Mancini at 1B and Mountcastle at DH and maybe figure out something else for CF when playing a lefty and I feel like it’s a good approach. That all depends on how well Mullins can hit. I’d be okay with a low bar set for him offensively though as long as his defense is above average. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oriole said:

A Hays, Mullins, Santander OF is actually pretty nice defensively. Put Mancini at 1B and Mountcastle at DH and maybe figure out something else for CF when playing a lefty and I feel like it’s a good approach. That all depends on how well Mullins can hit. I’d be okay with a low bar set for him offensively though as long as his defense is above average. 

Mullins is terrible 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think of the Orioles brand of good being more run prevention oriented.   The '69-'71 teams posted

OPS+: 110, 105 and 112

ERA+: 126, 116 and 113

Just measuring by raw Runs Scored or Runs Allowed better than League Average (boy were those numbers all better), the deltas across the three years make it seem like run production was more better

Runs Scored +0.757/season, Runs Allowed +0.683/season.   Anecdotes for the run prevented is better than run produced thing.

With a catcher in the middle of it and a couple few pitchers the brightest lights from here, you kind of imagine the early modestly successful better teams having a run suppressing tilt.

For 2021, I think for Elias and other clubs with a few pennies to spend, it's more, "What $8 million player will actually sign for $4, what $5 million player will sign for $2, etc"   Let's mess $$$/WAR up Barry Bonds style.    The trick with everyone getting bargains is finding the BEST bargains with your roster spots.

(If we have a $4M and a $2M, that is)

DJ LeMahieu and Justin Turner have been the Werthian apples of my eye for awhile if we were going to do anything like that this offseason; in theory there has to be a number somewhere Elias dials up ownership and goes, So....     Definitely Turner between those two these days.

And I write that very much hoping Yankees splurge 5 x $20M+ on old DJ to Gleyber lock SS in the Jeter style.   The 2025 Yankees have $250-some M for us to beat and that could be near 10% of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

Good point about claiming Sanchez.  The question is what his role will be.   I guess it depends on who else is brought in.  

Nunez was a little different case.  Elias was freeing up playing time for other players that are less expensive  IMO.

 

Sure, I guess, but most of the examples you cited are simply giving opportunities to guys who were already in the system / on the team, so I'm not sure it's indicative of any philosophical shift toward offense (at the expense of defense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, wildcard said:

Mike Elias has already stated that 2021 will not be a year to go for it.  The switch will not be flipped this coming season. But what kind of a team is he looking to build for his non contending year?

This off season he has referred to Ryan Mountcastle as a left fielder more than a first baseman.   Hyde often used Austin Hays in left and Cedric Mullins in center last season which gave him a better defensive outfield.  But Elias has  referred to those two as competing centerfielders.    This sound like an offense over defense approach. 

What about Yusniel Diaz?   He has been called close.  Someone that will debut in 2021.  The timing of his call up is unknown and since he has not played AAA yet he will probably begin the season there.  Its will probably be up to him to push his way to the majors.

Mountcastle in left opens first for Mancini.   It also allows two offensive players to compete for DH -- DJ Stewart and Chris Shaw at least until Diaz is promoted.  

Now we hear the hint that Elias may considering Jonathan Villar if the price is right.  Villar's best position is second base.  But second is also defensive minded Yolmer Sanchez best position. Its also Pat Valaika and Ramon Urias best defensive position.    But if they sign Villar it would be for his offense over defense.  It would push the other three toward SS and 3B to find playing time.  Richie Martin, Sanchez and Valaika are all probably better defensive SS than Villar.   Also Elias could acquire more than one infielder.

Villar to the O's is just a rumor.  But Mountcastle in left is something Elias has stated which may make room for Stewart/Shaw.   I have to wonder  whether offense in 2021 will be priorities over defense.   Time will tell.

No. He will take who is inexpensive and fits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...