Jump to content

Tanner Scott should be the closer


accinfo

Recommended Posts

Right now I would make Tanner Scott the closer to see how he reacts in the role.  By far without Hunter Harvey healthy he has the best stuff in this bullpen by far.  Valdez may get away with getting some saves but he is not at 36 going to get you anything of great value in a mid-season trade.  If Scott can show he can throw strikes in closing situations they could get a major haul in a trade.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LA2 said:

But didn't he say that depended on him mastering an additional pitch? (I might have misheard his comment to Garceau.)

The comment I heard was to Melanie Newman on the postgame show, and I don’t think he mentioned Scott needing a third pitch in that conversation.    But he may have said that earlier to Garceau.   I wasn’t watching until the 10th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Scott as closer a lot.  I'm not even all that traditional when it comes to the closer, but I think Scott is approaching a point where when he gets the ball, the game is over.  Even letting him close the final 2 innings at times seems like a good idea.  If he performed well, he could be a HUGE trade chip within the next 2 seasons.

The problem is getting a lead to Scott.  Armstrong, Tate, and Fry need to pick it up and just pitch better. Missing Harvey hurts badly right now.  I think Susler should be back up too.  Having the two rule 5 guys is tricky too; can they contribute at all, or are they truly "stashed?" They need to figure that out and make a decision.  If they can't step into middle relief in their eyes, I think they need to cut one.   I wonder if Connor Greene isn't a better use of one of those roster spots to help us with more late inning options..

I think Leblanc and Plutko are redundant and Valdez should be the long relief/ mop up guy.  I don't like Valdez at the end of the game.  To me he's a guy I bring in the 4th - 6th inning.  He' also my mop up guy. I don't think we are utilizing him correctly. I feel with the Rule 5 guys on the roster, we essentially have 5 "mop up guys" between them, Leblanc, Plutko, and Valdez. 

I think we cut Leblanc, Plutko, and one of the rule V.  Go with Valdez and one Rule V guy as mop up/long relief, Then Armstrong, Tate, Fry, Greene, Tate, and Sulser are my guys to get to Scott as the closer.  Fry is your only LHP besides the closer Scott in the bullpen, but Sulser almost pitches like a LHP with his repertoire; look at his splits; he kills lefties.  I also use my last bullpen spot on Lakins.  Once Harvey comes off the DL, option or DFA your weakest RHP option.

Long Relief/Mop up - Valdez, Scoeller

Middle Relief/Set up - Armstrong, Fry, Greene, Sulser, Tate, Lakins

Closer- Scott

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Harvey injury hurt, but just like Hays, he’s always hurt too. 
 

Scott should be our closer 100%. Valdez isn’t scaring anyone. In fact, after seeing Scott in the 8th teams have to be doing backflips to see Valdez. 
 

We have this boatload of strictly relievers on the 40 man, that cost us Pop, but instead we’re choosing to go with a pen of 2 rule 5 guys and Leblanc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The Harvey injury hurt, but just like Hays, he’s always hurt too. 

The two shouldn’t be mentioned in the same breath IMO.   Hays is frequently hurt.  Harvey is always hurt.   I feel way better about Hays eventually evading the injury bug than I do about Harvey.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The two shouldn’t be mentioned in the same breath IMO.   Hays is frequently hurt.  Harvey is always hurt.   I feel way better about Hays eventually evading the injury bug than I do about Harvey.   

I don't think it'll be that much longer until we feel the same way about Hays.  

Harvey is the worst though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

So do I unless Hunter Harvey somehow manages to stay healthy

I wasn’t that impressed with Harvey’s performance last year in the 8.2 innings he managed to pitch.    I was never a big Scott booster but there’s a decent chance he’s turned the corner.  He’s always going to have games where he can’t throw a strike, but they’re getting fewer and further between.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I think yesterday was the nail in the coffin for him being on the playoff roster, assuming we make it.
    • I feel that way, too. I keep thinking about 2005.  2005: 10 games over .500 on June 20th. 1st place, two games up.  Shortly after they went on a 2-16 skid, and their last game at .500 was at the the start of that awful home 4 game series in late July when the White Sox swept them, and Raffy was exposed as taking PEDs. They fell under .500 that series and kept on sinking.  2024: 24 games over .500 on June 20th. 2nd place, a half game back.  Then immediately lose five straight. Due to their great start, they can't finish 14 under .500, but the dive feels eerily similar with all of the injuries, dormant bats, and all happening at the same time of year.  The floor coming out from underneath them feels a lot like it. That team was cooked by late July and by the first week of August, Mazzilli got the axe. That won't happen with Hyde this time, as they had a fine start this year, but this can't happen two years in a row under him. 
    • I know …. Gotcha. Trade away Stowers & Norby for Garbage and pick up Rivera & Jiminez. And be surprised when you offense stinks. 
    • You could cut and paste this write up for about every team in the organization. 
    • It’s because the strategies that they are taught and employ work much better in the minors with pitchers with worse stuff and command than in the majors.  This, in turn, inflates their minor league stats.  The good news is that thus far after an adjustment period those players do seem to adjust and do well. 
    • This was the lineup today: The problem is injuries. Hyde didn't have to run out this sort of lineup in May or June. You can nitpick about whether these were the right nine to start, but these are the players on the roster right now and it's because guys who were here in the winning months are not available.
    • I think you agree Roy. The injuries are one thing, but combining them with the continual influx of rookies/ near-rookies - (as promising as they may be) creates instability.  Holliday, Cowser, Mayo, Norby, Kjerstad, Povich, even Stowers.  The past two years: Rutschman and Henderson. One rookie, a solid unremarkable, yet reliable core that had been playing together for several years. Maybe Elias needs to answer for this. I’m not buying the injury excuse for position players. The pitching - amazing job for the injury plague (Kimbrel not included). Have to wonder if these injuries have something to do with the training staff don’t you?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...