Jump to content

Texas Rangers designate former AL home run champion Khris Davis for assignment


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Yes I had him on my Rotis team in 2019 and I had to keep checking if I was listed with the other "Chris Davis"  He basically dropped off at the same rate as The Orioles Davis.   His contract ran through 2021.  They waited to the bitter end just like the Orioles will.  Again as it has been pointed out with Covid this year still around and a possible lockout/strike for next year the Orioles won't let him go until they know whether or not they can save some money on this contract.  Texas knows now that this season will be played and they have to pay him the rest of Khris Davis's contract through this year.  I really don't blame the Orioles at this point.  He isn't taking up a spot on the roster or blocking anyone.  If labor matters are resolved by spring training they may give Davis at bats but I even doubt that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

You’re right. But I don’t think his contract was near the albatross that the Chris David deal is. 
 

Not that it should matter. Dead weight is dead weight. 

Besides all the damage Covid-19 has brought to the world in the last year, it's also given incentive to the Angelos family to keep Davis on the roster. Orioles got out of paying Davis' full salary in 2020 and another work stoppage will bring about the same benefit. 

And with a potential lockout or strike in 2022, I don't see Davis getting released even though he's been done as a player for 3+ years now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Besides all the damage Covid-19 has brought to the world in the last year, it's also given incentive to the Angelos family to keep Davis on the roster. Orioles got out of paying Davis' full salary in 2020 and another work stoppage will bring about the same benefit. 

And with a potential lockout or strike in 2022, I don't see Davis getting released even though he's been done as a player for 3+ years now. 

Yeah, you’re right. I dunno, it’s still obnoxious to think about that being the only reason why to keep him around. 
 

It’s just a terrible staring contest between insufferable idiots.  Which dolt will blink first? Will Davis swallow some pride and call it a day or keep half-assing attempts to become a player who  can crack 0.0 WAR? Or will the terribly run franchise with ownership that everyone loves to loathe blink instead? 
 

Meanwhile a dwindling fanbase wants to be put out of its misery. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

You’re right. But I don’t think his contract was near the albatross that the Chris David deal is. 
 

Not that it should matter. Dead weight is dead weight. 

The A's didn't bid against themselves when negotiating with Davis.  

The only thing Chris Davis had that Khris Davis didn't was passable defense at 1st, and a slightly higher BA.   

As such, the As only wasted about 1/5 of the money on Khris Davis that the Orioles wasted on Chris ($33m vs $161m)   In fairness though, Chris Davis falling off a cliff two years prior to Khris Davis reaching FA signing probably scared teams away from signing him to a large contract.

 

Edited by GuidoSarducci
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

You’re right. But I don’t think his contract was near the albatross that the Chris David deal is. 
 

Not that it should matter. Dead weight is dead weight. 

Is there an insurance benefit this year as well being out for the year?  If so there is a potentially massive change in the dollars they personally hand out over 3 years. 

Still dead weight but at least it isn't costing a bench spot at this point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I almost hate to write this...but the Orioles have been wise to hold onto their own Chris Davis.  Covid has brought them relief that was never coming from another source and if insurance helps at all this year, it is even smarter.

 

I have long been in the camp that he should be cut, and I am almost certain that this feeling is simply out of anger...because on my list the second thing I had hoped for was that he would be drawn and quartered....so there is that.  

I hope in the future, when the Orioles need to spend that do so more intelligently than they did with Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, foxfield said:

I almost hate to write this...but the Orioles have been wise to hold onto their own Chris Davis.  Covid has brought them relief that was never coming from another source and if insurance helps at all this year, it is even smarter.

 

I have long been in the camp that he should be cut, and I am almost certain that this feeling is simply out of anger...because on my list the second thing I had hoped for was that he would be drawn and quartered....so there is that.  

I hope in the future, when the Orioles need to spend that do so more intelligently than they did with Davis.

Let Elias be the final decision maker on player contracts and this situation will be avoided in the future. Everything with the Chris Davis contract points to Angelos and Buck negotiating directly with Davis and Duquette was merely an observer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Let Elias be the final decision maker on player contracts and this situation will be avoided in the future. Everything with the Chris Davis contract points to Angelos and Buck negotiating directly with Davis and Duquette was merely an observer. 

I don't think it was Buck.  I think reports were that Boras went straight to ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Let Elias be the final decision maker on player contracts and this situation will be avoided in the future. Everything with the Chris Davis contract points to Angelos and Buck negotiating directly with Davis and Duquette was merely an observer. 

No way the owner isn't involved with contracts of that magnitude.  The problem the O's had is that Angelos had a dysfunctional group and encouraged all of the back channel stuff in spite of how it undermined everything and everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, foxfield said:

No way the owner isn't involved with contracts of that magnitude.  The problem the O's had is that Angelos had a dysfunctional group and encouraged all of the back channel stuff in spite of how it undermined everything and everyone. 

I'm sure you have at least one owner that gives his people a budget and doesn't get involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, foxfield said:

No way the owner isn't involved with contracts of that magnitude.  The problem the O's had is that Angelos had a dysfunctional group and encouraged all of the back channel stuff in spite of how it undermined everything and everyone. 

The owner should be approving budget not directly negotiating with agents. I think DD wasn't interested in resigning Davis at the price his agent was asking, but Boras started direct negotiations with Angelos.

Elias doesn't seem like the type to sign a high priced veteran free agent to a $160M contract, but his hands are tied if the Angelos brothers decide to dole out that amount of money. 

Subscribe: O’s owner Peter Angelos and Chris Davis’ agent Scott Boras “continue to have dialogue”

Quote

While it has been said that the Orioles have “pulled” the $154 million, seven-year offer to slugger Chris Davis, owner Peter Angelos and Davis’ agent Scott Boras continue to have dialogue by phone and continue to debate whether that is the appropriate offer; they spoke as recently as midweek.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...