Jump to content

Your 2022 FA Wish List


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

Apparently the Astros have offered Correa a few deals in the area of 6/120.  He made a comment that the Astros don’t like big contracts and that it wasn’t much of a negotiation.

The Astros are very smart and while they are willing to pay a lot, they will only go so far.

Correa, like Springer last year, will leave and get a huge deal Elsewhere.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Apparently the Astros have offered Correa a few deals in the area of 6/120.  He made a comment that the Astros don’t like big contracts and that it wasn’t much of a negotiation.

The Astros are very smart and while they are willing to pay a lot, they will only go so far.

Correa, like Springer last year, will leave and get a huge deal Elsewhere.

 

If Correa had a better track record on health, he’d probably get a lot more than that.  Those three straight years missing significant time with injuries hurt his stock considerably.

Still, 34.1.rWAR through his age 26 season in 752 games is pretty impressive.   A few comps through age 26:

Manny 37.0 rWAR in 1082 games

Harper 32.3 rWAR in 1084 games

Lindor 28.0 rWAR in 777 games.  

On a WAR/162 basis, Correa beats all three rather easily.   But, he has played 110 games or less in three different 152-game seasons.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

If Correa had a better track record on health, he’d probably get a lot more than that.  Those three straight years missing significant time with injuries hurt his stock considerably.

Still, 34.1.rWAR through his age 26 season in 752 games is pretty impressive.   A few comps through age 26:

Manny 37.0 rWAR in 1082 games

Harper 32.3 rWAR in 1084 games

Lindor 28.0 rWAR in 777 games.  

On a WAR/162 basis, Correa beats all three rather easily.   But, he has played 110 games or less in three different 152-game seasons.  
 

Oh, he’s getting way more than 6/120. He may push for Lindors deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Oh, he’s getting way more than 6/120. He may push for Lindors deal.

I agree, he’ll get a lot more than that.   I was more referring to what the Astros would pay to keep him.   I don’t think they’ll be in the finalists of the bidding for Correa because of his injury history with them.   

As to what some other team pays him, I’m guessing he falls short of Lindor, who was overpaid by a new owner wanting to flex his financial muscles.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Apparently the Astros have offered Correa a few deals in the area of 6/120.  He made a comment that the Astros don’t like big contracts and that it wasn’t much of a negotiation.

The Astros are very smart and while they are willing to pay a lot, they will only go so far.

Correa, like Springer last year, will leave and get a huge deal Elsewhere.

 

MLB Now yesterday excerpted some of Correa's interview here with the Cubs Talk Podcast.

https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/cubs-talk-podcast

He had his talking points down, citing how he led league in WAR, in dWAR, how even though teams don't like 10-year contracts they get given out to 30 year olds, and he is going to be 27 in Year1.   

Dan O'Dowd on the panel with Brian Kenny after the clip had the GM's counter of "two seasons with 475 PA".   Their back and forth was between 7 and 10 years on term.

So during the ALDS, he took a few minutes to cultivate the Chicago market.

The last two years, he has managed to overcome the intermittent injuries that dogged him so 2017-2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...