Jump to content

Rutschman/Mussina


NJOriolesFan

Recommended Posts

On 8/6/2021 at 2:22 PM, wildcard said:

I am with Tony on this.  Every Oriole that has had his number retired was part of a World Series team as an Oriole.   To retire Mussina's number lowers that bar.  I see no reason for it.

Mussina belongs in the O's HOF.  He deserves respect for being in the MLB HOF.   But he never led the O's to the WS.   Keep his number active.

 

So the Cubs should retire Jake Arrieta's number, but not Banks, Williams and Santo?  The Red Sox should un-retire Ted Williams' and Carl Yastrzemski's numbers, but retire David Ortiz' about four times over?  The Padres and Rangers should have zero retired numbers, correct?  Give Tony Gwynn's number to the next guy they call up to make a spot start because he never led them to a title.

Oh, and don't take any of this to mean I want Mussina's number retired.  I don't take as hard a line as Tony, but half a career in Baltimore followed by going to NYC doesn't pass my completely subjective threshold.  I just don't think a WS ring is a non-negotiable line you have to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mussina's is the toughest case that I can think of for retiring a past Oriole's number.  Frank Robinson was here less time, but had a bigger impact on the team.  He helped turn a good team into a great team.  Heck, Mike Cuellar may have had a bigger impact on the team than the other Mike #35.  Mussina was never the best pitcher in the league, but he was pretty much always one of the best.  It seemed to me that he was willing to settle for being another Yankee pitcher instead of the "Man" on an Oriole's staff.  I wouldn't get my nose bent out of joint if they did honor him that way.  But, I'm not really for it either.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2021 at 11:30 AM, Sports Guy said:

Good argument that he was the best pitcher in Os history.  (The argument is based around peak/numbers as an Oriole..obvious Palmer is more accomplished and probably still gets the nod but I think it’s closer than Os fans want to admit)
 

That said, I don’t think he should have his number retired because he did leave.  It was PA’s fault but he still left. 
 

I wouldn’t hate if they retired his number but I don’t feel it needs to happen either.

First post in a few years--Mussina 97 ALDS was the definition of an ace.  Locate in, out, and spike the knuckle-curve.  He had at least three very good to exceptional pitches.  I remember him throwing the filthiest 3-2 change to escape bases-loaded against Texas (~95?).  It was terrible when he departed for NYY.

I only saw Palmer in the 93 Old Timers' game, and he wasn't that good :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catch 8 said:

First post in a few years--Mussina 97 ALDS was the definition of an ace.  Locate in, out, and spike the knuckle-curve.  He had at least three very good to exceptional pitches.  I remember him throwing the filthiest 3-2 change to escape bases-loaded against Texas (~95?).  It was terrible when he departed for NYY.

I only saw Palmer in the 93 Old Timers' game, and he wasn't that good :)

Saw them both many times.  They were very close to equal IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2021 at 11:39 AM, Frobby said:

I don’t feel the way Tony does about Mussina, but I also would not retire his number.  He’s in the Orioles Hall of Fame, and that’s enough.  
 

Twelve people have worn that number over the years since Mussina left: 

Adam Plutko (2021)
Dwight Smith Jr. (2019-2020)
Brad Brach (2014-2018)
Danny Valencia (2013)
Bill Hall (2012)
Omar Quintanilla (2012)
Brad Bergesen (2009-2011)
Greg Aquino (2008)
Daniel Cabrera (2004-2007)
Rick Helling (2003)
Matt Riley (2003)
Josh Towers (2001-2002)

Before Mussina, Mike Cuellar and Wally Bunker (among others) also wore no. 35.

Fun fact:

Josh Towers has the best single season BB/9 mark in Orioles history.

He walked 16 guys in 140.1 innings in his 2001 rookie season for a BB/9 mark of 1.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Orioles4Life21 said:

Fun fact:

Josh Towers has the best single season BB/9 mark in Orioles history.

He walked 16 guys in 140.1 innings in his 2001 rookie season for a BB/9 mark of 1.0.

Interestingly enough I just looked at the place where I first found this out and Towers’ season isn’t even listed anymore. Was 140 innings not enough to qualify? https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/leaders_pitch_season.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2021 at 4:09 PM, rudyrooster said:

List of Orioles whom have had their jersey numbers retired is a short one, as well it should be.

#4  Earl Weaver.     

#5  Brooks Robinson

#8  Cal Ripken Jr.     

#20  Frank Robinson 

#22  Jim Palmer

#33   Eddie Murray 

Interesting that all SIX of these Orioles earned World Series rings and all SIX have statues at the ballpark.           

ftfy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2021 at 2:48 PM, spiritof66 said:

I don't see why winning a World Series, or being part of a team that came close, should be a requirement. The retirement of a number should be, IMO, a way to recognize guys with extraordinary (usually including lengthy) careers as Orioles players who meant a lot to the team, to its fans and to Baltimore. The guys whose numbers have been retired all meet those criteria. So do Boog Powell and Adam Jones, to take what are for me easy cases, among others.

 

I second that motion. But between the two, if forced to make a decision, it would be Boog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Adjusting to the bigger parks with the third deck was my argument after his 23 performance. I maintain that he can play well enough defensively in center to hold down the spot for a while (perhaps until EBJ or another prospect breaks into the league) but ultimately he is probably best suited in RF. I see a lot of Charlie Blackmon in CC’s game.  
    • He’s really something to watch when he’s got all his pitches working.  I think that even if Bradish is slightly better than Burnes, the O’s probably would start Burnes in game one of a playoff series due to the experience factor.  But that decision is more than four months away and like you said, let’s see who’s healthy.  
    • He just didn’t play defense very well during last year’s call-up.  It was aberrational, because he was a good defender in the minors.  Maybe just adjusting to seeing the ball well in the bigger stadiums with upper decks etc. I’m very impressed with his ability to move to any of the three OF spots from one game to the next, or even within games, and play well.  
    • Prompted by a post in another thread by @RZNJ, I was looking to see if Adley’s low walk rate was caused partially by being more aggressive on the first pitch.  Hardly.   Last year Adley had 40 PA where he put the first pitch in play.  This year, in 50 games he’s only done it six times!   His first pitch swing rate has dropped from 11.9% to 9.4%.   So, he’s actually doubled down on his take the first pitch strategy. On the other hand, Adley clearly has decided decided to get more aggressive in two-strike counts.  Last year, 27.7.% of his strikeouts were caught looking; this year, only 7.7%.    Last year, Adley let the count get full 113 times, and walked in 50 of those, striking out 20 times.  This year after 50 games he has only had a full count 18 times, walking 6, striking out twice.   Last year, Adley let the count get to two strikes  388 times, striking out 101 rimes and producing a .654 OPS in those at bats. This year, Adley has had 117 two-strike counts, striking out 39 times and producing a .547 OPS. There’s a lot to unpack there, but my big takeaway is that Adley is being even less aggressive than before on first pitches, and more aggressive pretty much everywhere else, and he’s not letting a two-strike pitch close to the strike zone go by without taking a swing at it.  
    • It’s a weird and interesting small sample stat, but I don’t put much stock in it.  
    • Exactly.   People have gone to a lot of trouble to properly weight the various outcomes of an at bat.
    • Even after being swept in STL, and then doing the sweeping  of the White Sox. Exact same record on this day as last year.But the big tests are coming.Almost no days off for 45 days.All AL Eastern teams for a while. It will be very interesting, and telling.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...