Jump to content

Rutschman/Mussina


NJOriolesFan

Recommended Posts

I didn't realize until I was at the Baysox game yesterday that Rutschman wears #35 with Bowie.  I know uniform # doesn't mean much with minor leaguers but is this a number that Rutschman selected and would like to wear with the Orioles?

This led me to thinking, since Mussina is in the HOF, 2nd best pitcher in Orioles history behind Palmer, better as an Oriole than a Yankee, does Mussina deserve to have his O's # retired?  I would say yes.  And that would put an end to any chance that Rutschman wears #35 with the O's.

Thoughts?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good argument that he was the best pitcher in Os history.  (The argument is based around peak/numbers as an Oriole..obvious Palmer is more accomplished and probably still gets the nod but I think it’s closer than Os fans want to admit)
 

That said, I don’t think he should have his number retired because he did leave.  It was PA’s fault but he still left. 
 

I wouldn’t hate if they retired his number but I don’t feel it needs to happen either.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t feel the way Tony does about Mussina, but I also would not retire his number.  He’s in the Orioles Hall of Fame, and that’s enough.  
 

Twelve people have worn that number over the years since Mussina left: 

Adam Plutko (2021)
Dwight Smith Jr. (2019-2020)
Brad Brach (2014-2018)
Danny Valencia (2013)
Bill Hall (2012)
Omar Quintanilla (2012)
Brad Bergesen (2009-2011)
Greg Aquino (2008)
Daniel Cabrera (2004-2007)
Rick Helling (2003)
Matt Riley (2003)
Josh Towers (2001-2002)

Before Mussina, Mike Cuellar and Wally Bunker (among others) also wore no. 35.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It occurs to me that 35 has to easily be the winningest pitcher uniform number for the O’s.    You’ve got Mussina at 147 and Cuellar at 143, Cabrera at 48, Bunker at 44, Brach at 27 — that’s 409 right there and I’m leaving out a lot of other guys.   22 can’t possibly compete despite Palmer having 269 by himself, since nobody’s worn it since 1984.    

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony I love and respect the hell out of you, with just about everything except for your take on Mussina. 

I know you have more behind the scenes, and that all well and good.

I wont even go as far as to say you are wrong.

Difference of opinion and thats all it is.

Mussina is in MLB HOF and deserves his # to be retired.

To me, I burn Angelos at the stake for creating such a foul air with the team.

Davy did back to back deep playoff runs, only to he chased out of town, like a loser.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

Tony I love and respect the hell out of you, with just about everything except for your take on Mussina. 

I know you have more behind the scenes, and that all well and good.

I wont even go as far as to say you are wrong.

Difference of opinion and thats all it is.

Mussina is in MLB HOF and deserves his # to be retired.

To me, I burn Angelos at the stake for creating such a foul air with the team.

Davy did back to back deep playoff runs, only to he chased out of town, like a loser.

 

Its ok, I have and will always have strong feelings abut Mu$$ina. I also can remember stories his brother used to tell about him back in the day about how much of a selfish ahole he was so that may have always swayed my opinion as well. I'm sure Mu$$ina has grown and matured and I dont hold any ill will feelings towards him as a person, but he's a guy who gave up an opportunity to leave a legacy.

Not many players have that opportunity and he gave it up to become another nameless Yankees far behind the Yankees greats. MuSSina never cared about his legacy because a legacy is based upon what others think of you and Mu$$ina never cared about the fans one bit. It was always about himself and was to the very end when he hung around just long enough to win 20 games and retire.

I know fans love him because they remember those big games he won and yes, I have found memories of some great starts by him particularly in that Seattle series, but the Oriole fan in me will never forgive him because I truly believe him leaving is what started the Orioles circling of the drain to baseball obscurity.

Now don't get me wrong, Angelos' ownership is the primary reason, but I always wonder had Mu$$ina signed that contract that he was offered in the end, the one that offered him the same amount of money to leave, would the Orioles have still sucked? Maybe. But we would have had another Orioles legend and he would have rightfully taken his spot amongst the Orioles greats and had his number retired. 

Instead he's just a random Yankees pitcher who will never be remember amongst the greats by Yankees fans. Which honestly is probably more fitting for him.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Its ok, I have and will always have strong feelings abut Mu$$ina. I also can remember stories his brother used to tell about him back in the day about how much of a selfish ahole he was so that may have always swayed my opinion as well. I'm sure Mu$$ina has grown and matured and I dont hold any ill will feelings towards him as a person, but he's a guy who gave up an opportunity to leave a legacy.

Not many players have that opportunity and he gave it up to become another nameless Yankees far behind the Yankees greats. MuSSina never cared about his legacy because a legacy is based upon what others think of you and Mu$$ina never cared about the fans one bit. It was always about himself and was to the very end when he hung around just long enough to win 20 games and retire.

I know fans love him because they remember those big games he won and yes, I have found memories of some great starts by him particularly in that Seattle series, but the Oriole fan in me will never forgive him because I truly believe him leaving is what started the Orioles circling of the drain to baseball obscurity.

Now don't get me wrong, Angelos' ownership is the primary reason, but I always wonder had Mu$$ina signed that contract that he was offered in the end, the one that offered him the same amount of money to leave, would the Orioles have still sucked? Maybe. But we would have had another Orioles legend and he would have rightfully taken his spot amongst the Orioles greats and had his number retired. 

Instead he's just a random Yankees pitcher who will never be remember amongst the greats by Yankees fans. Which honestly is probably more fitting for him.

You make several valid points.

But, as a player, you play the game, ultimately you want to provide for your family and most really want to earn that converted WS trophy.

None of which would happen, even he had stayed with the Orioles. 

After 97, it was all downhill, until Andy was hired then, Buck and then DD.

They had a good 5 year run, and now we are back to being the butt stock of the MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I don’t feel the way Tony does about Mussina, but I also would not retire his number.  He’s in the Orioles Hall of Fame, and that’s enough.  
 

Twelve people have worn that number over the years since Mussina left: 

Adam Plutko (2021)
Dwight Smith Jr. (2019-2020)
Brad Brach (2014-2018)
Danny Valencia (2013)
Bill Hall (2012)
Omar Quintanilla (2012)
Brad Bergesen (2009-2011)
Greg Aquino (2008)
Daniel Cabrera (2004-2007)
Rick Helling (2003)
Matt Riley (2003)
Josh Towers (2001-2002)

Before Mussina, Mike Cuellar and Wally Bunker (among others) also wore no. 35.

Now there's a Who's Who list of forgettable players that came through Baltimore.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

No, no..no..no.  and no some more.

I hope Rutschman comes up and wears #35 and then has his number retired! 

That would be the best case scenario.

Without getting into everything with Mu$$ina, he's a Yankee. Any legacy Mu$$ina ever was about to have with the Orioles was destroyed the moment he became the first Orioles ever to be drafted, developed and starred with the team to sign with the Yankees in his prime. 

Mu$$ina never wanted the pressure of being a number one pitcher. It's didn't fit his personality and being a 3rd/4th starter on loaded Yankees teams was a lot easier and they paid him well on top of it all.

His legacy will be as a very good pitcher who split his time with two organizations, one of which was the Orioles. He belongs in the Orioles HoF because of what he accomplished on the field as an Oriole, but retired numbers are for the absolute greats that not only performed at a HoF level while with the Orioles, but who helped win World Series. 

 

Agree 100%, plus, when he himself was asked, he did not commit. That means he’s just, “for sale”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t feel the way Tony does about Mussina, but I also would not retire his number.  He’s in the Orioles Hall of Fame, and that’s enough.  
 

Twelve people have worn that number over the years since Mussina left: 

Adam Plutko (2021)
Dwight Smith Jr. (2019-2020)
Brad Brach (2014-2018)
Danny Valencia (2013)
Bill Hall (2012)
Omar Quintanilla (2012)
Brad Bergesen (2009-2011)
Greg Aquino (2008)
Daniel Cabrera (2004-2007)
Rick Helling (2003)
Matt Riley (2003)
Josh Towers (2001-2002)

Before Mussina, Mike Cuellar and Wally Bunker (among others) also wore no. 35.

Josh Towers was a flippin' 15th round draft pick. They couldn't wait to give that number away, which I find petty.  Why?  Look at all he did for the organization while he was here.   For example, other than Billy Ripken wearing #7 briefly as a tribute to his dad in '88, that number has been unofficially retired by the team since Belanger last wore 30 years ago it in '81.  Moose could have had that quiet honor, even for a little while.   Now, 21 years later, too much water under the bridge, so let Rutschman have it if he chooses.

I'm not going to rehash the old history again, but Moose leaving is all on Big Pete.  Wren had a cheaper deal agreed to with Moose's agent and it died on Peter's desk.  Tony and I will never see eye to eye on this, and that's fine. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

Josh Towers was a flippin' 15th round draft pick. They couldn't wait to give that number away, which I find petty.  Why?  Look at all he did for the organization while he was here.   For example, other than Billy Ripken wearing #7 briefly as a tribute to his dad in '88, that number has been unofficially retired by the team since Belanger last wore 30 years ago it in '81.  Moose could have had that quiet honor, even for a little while.   Now, 21 years later, too much water under the bridge, so let Rutschman have it if he chooses.

I'm not going to rehash the old history again, but Moose leaving is all on Big Pete.  Wren had a cheaper deal agreed to with Moose's agent and it died on Peter's desk.  Tony and I will never see eye to eye on this, and that's fine. 

 

Well said…completely all on PA.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with Tony on this.  Every Oriole that has had his number retired was part of a World Series team as an Oriole.   To retire Mussina's number lowers that bar.  I see no reason for it.

Mussina belongs in the O's HOF.  He deserves respect for being in the MLB HOF.   But he never led the O's to the WS.   Keep his number active.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I am with Tony on this.  Every Oriole that has had his number retired was part of a World Series team as an Oriole.   To retire Mussina's number lowers that bar.  I see no reason for it.

Mussina belongs in the O's HOF.  He deserves respect for being in the MLB HOF.   But he never led the O's to the WS.   Keep his number active.

 

So let’s say we eventually have some other Hall of Famer who plays most or all of his career here but the O’s never win a WS while he’s here.   Would you not retire his number because of that?

I’m fine with not retiring Mussina’s number, but it’s not his fault the O’s never won a WS with him.   The guy was absolutely brilliant in the 1997 playoffs but the team couldn’t pull it off, for completely unrelated reasons.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
    • The fact that they put this on the 1991 Donruss, perhaps the ultimate peak of the junk wax era, makes this even funnier to me.  If toilet paper ever shot up in price I wouldn't care because I've got heaps of '91 Donruss floating around. This is very true, which makes me thinks he'll get claimed somewhere else.
    • It's like the ghost of Chris Davis found him and has taken over his body.   I know bat speed isn't everything, but with the bat speed info that dropped, I took a look.  His average is 70.9 which isn't terribly slow, it's actually pretty average.   For whatever reason, he just can't square anything up.  I hope he fixes it but it's really tough to watch right now.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...