Jump to content

Jorge Mateo 2021


interloper

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Well, looking it up might be worthwhile.  According to Al Bumbry Stats | Baseball-Reference.com, Bumbry played a total of 33 games in his career in RF (29 of them in 1973), while Baylor played 200 career games in RF.  Rettenmund didn't have much of an arm either, but RF was his position more than LF, and he did 81 games in RF in 1973.  Fwiw, Bumbry had a very weak arm - just like Baylor - and very similar to Mullins of the current O's.    

Thank you.   In 1973, Don Baylor started 96 games in LF and 0 games in RF.   Bumbry started 58 in LF 24 in RF an surprisingly 0 games in CF in 1973.   Coggins 56 in RF and 38 in CF.   Blair started 123 in CF.   Rettenmund started  71 in RF and 6 in LF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Baylor played almost exclusively in LF without even looking it up.   He had one of the worst arms ever even in LF.  Bumbry's was weak too but it was a cannon compared to Baylor's.   Coggins played CF and RF.   Blair, of course, played exclusively in CF when he played and that must mean that Rettenumd played most of his starts in RF.    Bumby played in LF and CF.

I believe Don Baylor's arm was as bad as it was because of an old football injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SteveA said:

I believe Don Baylor's arm was as bad as it was because of an old football injury.

Right. They said it was from a HS football injury.   Unfortunately, his arm was awful because of it.   I don't think I've seen one worse since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Oh, hey, I didn't mean this as snarky as it probably sounded. My bad. Definitely not trying to put anyone in their place with that comment.

Honestly, I didn't read the whole thread, I just have been feeling like he's been pretty lucky and it turns out that's maybe true upon looking up the numbers. I've really enjoyed watching him and agree with everything you've said here. I'm really just reminding myself to not get too excited about his current hot streak. 

Haha, I figured you weren't actually attacking a strawman. Just being a bit snarky myself, I guess. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Thank you.   In 1973, Don Baylor started 96 games in LF and 0 games in RF.   Bumbry started 58 in LF 24 in RF an surprisingly 0 games in CF in 1973.   Coggins 56 in RF and 38 in CF.   Blair started 123 in CF.   Rettenmund started  71 in RF and 6 in LF.

And in 1974, all of Bumbry's 65 OF starts were in... LF, Baylor had the other 97 starts in LF and 23 starts in RF, Merv... played for Cincy, Coggins started 71 times in RF and 26 in LF, Blair had the remaining 136 starts in CF.  And a fellow by the name of Jim Fuller (who's name doesn't ring a bell to me) started 48 games in RF, while the versatile Enos Cabell started 18 games in RF.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ruzious said:

And in 1974, all of Bumbry's 65 OF starts were in... LF, Baylor had the other 97 starts in LF and 23 starts in RF, Merv... played for Cincy, Coggins started 71 times in RF and 26 in LF, Blair had the remaining 136 starts in CF.  And a fellow by the name of Jim Fuller (who's name doesn't ring a bell to me) started 48 games in RF, while the versatile Enos Cabell started 18 games in RF.    

Edit - that's 26 in CF - not LF - for Coggins.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

And in 1974, all of Bumbry's 65 OF starts were in... LF, Baylor had the other 97 starts in LF and 23 starts in RF, Merv... played for Cincy, Coggins started 71 times in RF and 26 in LF, Blair had the remaining 136 starts in CF.  And a fellow by the name of Jim Fuller (who's name doesn't ring a bell to me) started 48 games in RF, while the versatile Enos Cabell started 18 games in RF.    

Jim Fuller was a minor league home run legend.  He was an intriguing prospect who graduated one level at a time and came up in 73 for a cup of coffee.   I believe the Yanks played the 74 season in Shea stadium while Yankee stadium was being renovated.   I saw a double header against the O's vs. Yanks and Fuller hit one of the hardest homeruns I've ever seen out to leftcenter.    He had a another shot with the Astros a couple of years later and then was out of baseball.   I believe he became somewhat of a softball legend as well after his ML career was over.   Dude was big and strong and also had a really strong arm.  He just struck out a lot and didn't take a walk either.   Look him up though.  His minor league numbers are pretty impressive.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=fuller003jam

 

Nonetheless, the prospect’s ability was recognized by one of the key men in the organization. Orioles manager Earl Weaver said, “With most batters an infielder has about a second to react when they hit the ball. When Fuller hits the ball right the outfielders have a second.”

 

This is a good read.

 

https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/jim-fuller/

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Jim Fuller was a minor league home run legend.  He was an intriguing prospect who graduated one level at a time and came up in 73 for a cup of coffee.   I believe the Yanks played the 74 season in Shea stadium while Yankee stadium was being renovated.   I saw a double header against the O's vs. Yanks and Fuller hit one of the hardest homeruns I've ever seen out to leftcenter.    He had a another shot with the Astros a couple of years later and then was out of baseball.   I believe he became somewhat of a softball legend as well after his ML career was over.   Dude was big and strong and also had a really strong arm.  He just struck out a lot and didn't take a walk either.   Look him up though.  His minor league numbers are pretty impressive.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=fuller003jam

 

Nonetheless, the prospect’s ability was recognized by one of the key men in the organization. Orioles manager Earl Weaver said, “With most batters an infielder has about a second to react when they hit the ball. When Fuller hits the ball right the outfielders have a second.”

 

This is a good read.

 

https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/jim-fuller/

Good stuff.  Yeah, he had some terrific minor league years with the O's - including AAA at age 22.  The high SO numbers must have scared people more back then they do now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I watch of Mateo the more I think he should be the very day SS in 2022. He's got all the tools and although he may make the occasional error, if he can continue to be an effective hitter above .720 OPS, i think he can be ok over there. He's some of his action at SS.

https://www.mlb.com/video/00u7jzgkdtP9kH55c356/reels/mateo-playing-ss-with-o-s

He's the first guy that Orioles have grabbed off the waiver wire that looks like he could end up a piece. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The more I watch of Mateo the more I think he should be the very day SS in 2022. He's got all the tools and although he may make the occasional error, if he can continue to be an effective hitter above .720 OPS, i think he can be ok over there. He's some of his action at SS.

https://www.mlb.com/video/00u7jzgkdtP9kH55c356/reels/mateo-playing-ss-with-o-s

He's the first guy that Orioles have grabbed off the waiver wire that looks like he could end up a piece. 

Really appreciate the videos. Thanks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The more I watch of Mateo the more I think he should be the very day SS in 2022. He's got all the tools and although he may make the occasional error, if he can continue to be an effective hitter above .720 OPS, i think he can be ok over there. He's some of his action at SS.

https://www.mlb.com/video/00u7jzgkdtP9kH55c356/reels/mateo-playing-ss-with-o-s

He's the first guy that Orioles have grabbed off the waiver wire that looks like he could end up a piece. 

Urias? Solid defense, high walk rate and .760 OPS. He doesn't have Mateo's crazy athleticism but still seems like at least a utility guy with possible upside as everyday 2B. I love his AB's on a team that sorely needs hitters with plate discipline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The more I watch of Mateo the more I think he should be the very day SS in 2022. He's got all the tools and although he may make the occasional error, if he can continue to be an effective hitter above .720 OPS, i think he can be ok over there. He's some of his action at SS.

https://www.mlb.com/video/00u7jzgkdtP9kH55c356/reels/mateo-playing-ss-with-o-s

He's the first guy that Orioles have grabbed off the waiver wire that looks like he could end up a piece. 

Yes I like him too, he hasnt really been challenged too much yet in his 11 or so games but he hasnt failed the test either. Arm looks plenty strong enough. Mateo's elite speed and promising bat mean he brings something extra to the position. He easily has 25 SB speed if he played a full season. Maybe 15 HR power.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...