Jump to content

Should the Orioles claim RHP Chris Ellis from TB? (Update: Claimed, Valdez DFA'd)


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Philip said:

I don’t know why it took so long? I thought it was a potential pick up as soon as I saw the article on trade rumors. I am always happy to get a reject pitcher from Tampa Bay.

I think waiver claims are generally announced on Fridays.   Saw something like that when I was scrolling through the CBA the other day.   

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Congrats on calling this one.  But I honestly don't know why Elias thinks Ellis can help the team.  He has failed as a starter and a reliever at AAA. He is 28.   He can be optioned but I am not sure he is better than what the O's have a AAA.  He looks like he would follow Hartman off the 40 man roster.

Obviously Elias sees something that I can't.  

By the way Hartman being DFA'd leaves a 40 man roster spot open.   I expect Elias will not leave that seat empty long. 

Didn't Ellis take Hartman's 40 man spot???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, wildcard said:

Congrats on calling this one.  But I honestly don't know why Elias thinks Ellis can help the team.  He has failed as a starter and a reliever at AAA. He is 28.   He can be optioned but I am not sure he is better than what the O's have a AAA.  He looks like he would follow Hartman off the 40 man roster.

Obviously Elias sees something that I can't.  

By the way Hartman being DFA'd leaves a 40 man roster spot open.   I expect Elias will not leave that seat empty long. 

Well, he probably is thinking something similar to what I wrote. He has a better chance of being something than Valdez, so why not? He pitched poorly at AAA this year but did pitch fantastically in AAAA vs the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ellis is not some TB reliever in the true sense. He only signed with them this offseason. In 300+ AAA IP over 5 seasons, he has a 6.09 ERA. I think this is purely a fresh arm move. 
 

I’m still intrigued by Valdez, and I think he could have success if we have some of our power bullpen arms pan out. If Harvey, Bautista, and Burdi work out, to pair with Scott. Imagine sandwiching Valdez between 100mph throwers like Scott and Bautista. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
7 hours ago, Flash- bd said:

Have we found something here, in this guy? 

Probably not.

I mean, maybe.  But the odds are we haven't.  That's not a slam on him, that's just how baseball works.

Yesterday was a decent start, IMO, not a great one.  He went 5 innings, threw 91 pitches.  He struck out 4 which is okay, not great, but he also walked 4, too.

He pitched out of two bases loaded jams.  IMO, that's not a recipe for success.  I said it in the game thread but I'll say it again here; it was a pretty cool highwire balancing act.  

Now I will say he probably didn't have his best stuff and he battled and figured out a way to get out of his jams. He battled, and that's great.  But we still need to see more of him to see if we have something or not.  The history of baseball is littered with guys who came up and had some initial success but couldn't sustain it.  For every John Means you get, there's dozens of Josh Towers.  

This isn't to say I don't want to see more of Ellis, I absolutely do.  But there are warning signs, he's struck out 11 in 17.2 innings and he's walked 8 in Baltimore.  That's not great and with those k/bb rates a 2.08 ERA isn't sustainable.  His FIP is 5.08.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume he’s just having his Spenser Watkins Moment (trademark pending).

You know how the Orioles sometimes face some rookie pitcher who’s either making his debut or has pitched a couple of games and was mediocre in the minors, and we all grumble when the O’s get befuddled by the guy?    Guess what, sometimes it happens to other teams, too.   Hard to believe, I know.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It takes Orioles rookies 60 or 70 at bats to get their first two hits.
    • Tell me how can Harbaugh help him when he doesn't know how to help himself. Harbs is the worst at burning timeouts stupidly then not having any when they are needed at crunch time. 
    • Yes the same here. They are going to the playoffs and yet I have no feeling towards it whatsoever. Weird feeling. Like you just know they are going to get bounced in the first round. It looks inevitable. I mean you could make a case the Tigers are more deserving of the Orioles spot. They are playing some great baseball of late. 
    • Man Baltimore sports has not been kind. The Orioles are on a  3 month tailspin and the Ravens did what they do best and blew another double digit 4th quarter lead to a inferior team.  Let's see if the Orioles can right the ship,  though I'm not holding my breath on that one at all. Yikes. 
    • Idk how impactful this was, probably pretty low on the list of problems, but this is the 2nd straight week that Lamar threw the ball late in the game and the receiver was unable to get oob.  The ball to Bateman is probably excusable because we had more time on the clock and we needed the deep ball to be in position to make a run, but this time throwing a 12 yard dump to Andrews was just straight up stupid IMO.  I get that they're going to play outside leverage all day every day in this situation but just throw it away and try to take another shot.  Lamar has to have more clock awareness than that,  and Harbaugh has to instill in him the importance of saving those seconds on the clock.
    • Sorry but that response from Fuller sounds to me like too many words, concepts, abstractions, and if that's how he communicates, wordy and convoluted, it's a lot for hitters to carry "into the box." Not to mention all the specifics involved, re. what pitches and locations to look for, all the analytics of how to do the swing and torque the body, etc. I'm no coach but I can imagine a whole season of this approach just becomes information overload. Maybe it's not rocket science, after all (with all due respect to ex-NASA Sig). Maybe the antidote is more Zen: just see the pitch and hit the dang thing.  BTW I think the analytical, overthinking approach is better suited to the pitching side, where you can plan your attack based on all the data. Hitting is more reaction, no time to think. You can't beat pitching using the same approach--rather, need the opposite approach, to counter with instinct and intuition. At least, that's my cheap (2 cents) advice!
    • The proposition that every auction automatically results in an overpay is simplified indeed.  Granted, "kind of true" is a low bar to clear, but still...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...