Jump to content

Kelvin Gutierrez’s defense


Frobby

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

His speed is not elite, but he’s pretty quick.   Statcast has him at 28.1 ft/sec, 77th percentile sprint speed.   

I don’t think he will hit enough to justify carrying his glove, as his -0.8 rWAR suggests.   But I do appreciate his defense for its own sake, while we have him.   
 

I love his D also and was wondering, does his D and -0.8 rWAR still outperform Mychael Franco this season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, bobmc said:

I love his D also and was wondering, does his D and -0.8 rWAR still outperform Mychael Franco this season?

Franco: -1.6 rWAR in 104 games

Gutierrez: -0.8 rWAR in 73 games.   However, 0.0 rWAR in 35 games with the Orioles.   

So, advantage Gutierrez.   
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Franco: -1.6 rWAR in 104 games

Gutierrez: -0.8 rWAR in 73 games.   However, 0.0 rWAR in 35 games with the Orioles.   

So, advantage Gutierrez.   
 

SSS but still muy bueno!  He's fun to watch.  He enjoys it, is a "physical specimen" and a cool "sleeper find".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus defense. Past scouting reports note that he had some of the best Trackman Data in the Royals system. I’ve seen him have has high as a 60/80 for Raw Power. 
 

This looks like the type of guy we should be taking a chance on. Especially since he can hold down 3B defensively, and we don’t have any decent internal options for 2022. Hopefully, he can put his swing together for us. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Plus defense. Past scouting reports note that he had some of the best Trackman Data in the Royals system. I’ve seen him have has high as a 60/80 for Raw Power. 
 

This looks like the type of guy we should be taking a chance on. Especially since he can hold down 3B defensively, and we don’t have any decent internal options for 2022. Hopefully, he can put his swing together for us. 

I don't see him holding on to a 40 man roster spot over the winter.   Elias has mentioned that he wants to hold on to Urias and Mateo.  He also said he believes the team needs some infield help from outside the organization.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I don't see him holding on to a 40 man roster spot over the winter.   Elias has mentioned that he wants to hold on to Urias and Mateo.  He also said he believes the team needs some infield help from outside the organization.  

I agree that Urias and Mateo will be more of a priority to keep on the 40 man roster. If Gutierrez could hit any then he gets protected, but he also wouldn't have been available in the first place.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Urias has 1.9 bWAR. In a season of small victories, I think he is definitely one. Mateo also has positive WAR, but only .4.
In the absence of any better options at third I would much rather have Gutierrez then someone like Ruiz or Franco or any of the other lumberjacks we’ve trundled out there. I think there’s a reason to keep him, however it’s unlikely anyone would claim him if he were DFAed, so that’s ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
29 minutes ago, SilverRocket said:

HR for Gutierrez tonight, putting his OPS over .600. He's gotten on base his last 14 games.

I wonder what the deal is with the bad defensive numbers in KC this year.

Really making the most of his opportunity. Can he hit consistently is the question. Elias loved Ruiz so my guess is he is a nugget.

Edited by NelsonCruuuuuz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite my better instincts, I find myself foolishly dreaming on Gutierrez.   Not that I think he could ever be a good hitter - but what if he could be .700ish?   He was .741 in the minors.   At .700, his defense might be enough to carry him.  I like his speed, and the way he busts it down the line on every ground ball.  He just can’t hit - can he?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

Despite my better instincts, I find myself foolishly dreaming on Gutierrez.   Not that I think he could ever be a good hitter - but what if he could be .700ish?   He was .741 in the minors.   At .700, his defense might be enough to carry him.  I like his speed, and the way he busts it down the line on every ground ball.  He just can’t hit - can he?   

I find myself thinking the same because I enjoy watching him in the field. Could he learn to play short? I would feel better about hiding his bat there, the average OPS at SS is usually about 50 points lower than 3B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Similar to Mateo, he is like the epitome of replacement level. Will be tough to keep on a good team but also tough to get rid of. I also like that he always seems to be smiling. I would say both his bat and fielding compare favorably to Ruiz as well as the version of Franco that we had. If we brought in a Josh Harrison or Eduardo Escobar would there be a spot for him? Or do you roll with Gutierrez and put all FA dollars into pitching?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but it's a no from me.  Even while he's OPS'd a solid .768 in September/Oct, it's come with a BAPIP of .379 - unsustainable.  I'd be fine with having him in AAA next season - but not on the MLB roster unless he tears it up in AAA for at least a couple of months.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's basically dumped Ruiz to give Franco a try.   Ruiz and Gutierrez are similar players.   I don't see Elias sticking with Gutierrez when the O's are now thinking that its time to start winning.   Elias will be looking for a 3B that can both hit and play defense.   Whether that is Urias or someone else. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...