Jump to content

Trevor Bauer


sevastras

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

And given that you can change your mind at any point and stop giving consent losing the ability to give consent is the same as no longer giving consent.

Once you lose the ability to say yes you are saying no.

That is certainly a valid concern, but the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt in court. It is a bit of a gray area, depends on the the totality of the circumstances. There are many many factors to consider in each situation. There are aggravating and mitigating factors.

And to be clear, I am not justifying or defending his actions. I find his character to be distasteful at best. I also detest what society does today when deciding a person’s guilt based on an edited snippet of video, a partial list of “facts,” and the wave of public opinion and ridicule (regardless of fact) because they do not like someone. It is not what America stands for. It ruins lives on a daily basis. It sickens me. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jammer7 said:

That is certainly a valid concern, but the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt in court. It is a bit of a gray area, depends on the the totality of the circumstances. There are many many factors to consider in each situation. There are aggravating and mitigating factors.

And to be clear, I am not justifying or defending his actions. I find his character to be distasteful at best. I also detest what society does today when deciding a person’s guilt based on an edited snippet of video, a partial list of “facts,” and the wave of public opinion and ridicule (regardless of fact) because they do not like someone. It is not what America stands for. It ruins lives on a daily basis. It sickens me. 

What you describe certainly does occur.

But I would think it occurs far, far less than actual acts of sexual violence which also ruin lives on a daily basis.   FAR less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SteveA said:

What you describe certainly does occur.

But I would think it occurs far, far less than actual acts of sexual violence which also ruin lives on a daily basis.   FAR less.

Hard to say, really, since much of this kind of thing goes unreported. I have worked in a field familiar with these kinds of things for 27 years. You may be surprised at how many people say they were sexually assaulted and were not when the facts come out. This has been my experience, but in no way does it demean or cast doubt upon anyone who was legitimately assaulted. The investigations should be of a strict confidentiality until the facts are determined. And really, every criminal investigation should be this way. Instead, we see snippets on CNN and immediately form opinions of things we know very little about. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jammer7 said:

Hard to say, really, since much of this kind of thing goes unreported. I have worked in a field familiar with these kinds of things for 27 years. You may be surprised at how many people say they were sexually assaulted and were not when the facts come out. This has been my experience, but in no way does it demean or cast doubt upon anyone who was legitimately assaulted. The investigations should be of a strict confidentiality until the facts are determined. And really, every criminal investigation should be this way. Instead, we see snippets on CNN and immediately form opinions of things we know very little about. 

That’s the point I was trying to make. Somewhere online I saw a photograph *^%# the Athletics just tied Seattle… And it showed some woman holding up a sign saying, “believe all survivors.” Oh really? How do you know who’s a survivor and who’s lying for their own purposes, and people have really loopy purposes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Philip said:

That’s the point I was trying to make. Somewhere online I saw a photograph *^%# the Athletics just tied Seattle… And it showed some woman holding up a sign saying, “believe all survivors.” Oh really? How do you know who’s a survivor and who’s lying for their own purposes, and people have really loopy purposes.

Questionable motives are out there, certainly on all sides. Professional athletes, like all public figures, are sometimes targets and have to be very careful what situation they put themselves into. It would be a huge risk to bring in a player who finds himself in bad situations frequently. I would not want that in my clubhouse, especially with a young team. Even at the league minimum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I get that everybody wants the best of both worlds. But 2 questions: 1) What would be the plan for the pitching next year if we just went the rental/shortest term route? 2) Is Quantrill a guy that you trust making postseason starts? If so, what gives you confidence in him?
    • Because it's an attempt to curb one team's fanbase from stuffing the ballot.
    • 1 vs 2 vote is stupid after #1 already got the most votes.  Why not 2 cs 3 for reserve?
    • Picking at 22 and 32 we have a chance to nab some guys with resumes. Benge, Brecht, Honeycutt, Amick, White, Culpepper, and one of the NCAA C if we want. Hopefully we can get two of those guys when we pick. Developing pitching and keeping it healthy is hard. With our recent history with bats it might be good to keep growing them. Benge and White/Amick would be ideal. They could be real close to Bowie this time next year. 
    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...