Jump to content

2022 MLB Draft Discussion (Use this thread to discuss all picks, not Orioles picks)


Recommended Posts

Honestly, if Termarr signs for - hypothetically - $2 million or so under slot and we use those savings for the next few picks to go over slot, I don't think it's a bad strategy. Especially since we have so many high picks this year.

I like Johnson probably 4th after Holliday, Jones, and Collier, but if his bat turns out to be as special as all the scouts say it is and we wind up with a better starting pitcher or two with picks 2-5, I don't mind the approach. I think Termarr is the only guy who would sign for substantially less than slot because he knows he can fall a bit if he doesn't cut a deal with the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

Honestly, if Termarr signs for - hypothetically - $2 million or so under slot and we use those savings for the next few picks to go over slot, I don't think it's a bad strategy. Especially since we have so many high picks this year.

I like Johnson probably 4th after Holliday, Jones, and Collier, but if his bat turns out to be as special as all the scouts say it is and we wind up with a better starting pitcher or two with picks 2-5, I don't mind the approach. I think Termarr is the only guy who would sign for substantially less than slot because he knows he can fall a bit if he doesn't cut a deal with the Orioles.

Any strategy where you don’t take the best talent on your board is a bad strategy. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Any strategy where you don’t take the best talent on your board is a bad strategy. 

I partly agree, but in general, isn't the goal to end up with the MOST talent, as opposed to the single BEST talent?

And I'm in the Jones camp just for reference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

I partly agree, but in general, isn't the goal to end up with the MOST talent, as opposed to the single BEST talent?

And I'm in the Jones camp just for reference.

Well if you picked BPA on your board with every pick, theoretically in your eyes, you’d do that every single draft. 
 

Elias has said multiple times he wanted to “maximize” the return with the 2nd biggest draft pool in history. I’m sure that’s the plan.

***also in the Jones camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

I partly agree, but in general, isn't the goal to end up with the MOST talent, as opposed to the single BEST talent?

And I'm in the Jones camp just for reference.

What's most?

To me most would be the greatest accumulation of MLB wins within the period of team control.

Some years that could be a single player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Well if you picked BPA on your board with every pick, theoretically in your eyes, you’d do that every single draft. 
 

Elias has said multiple times he wanted to “maximize” the return with the 2nd biggest draft pool in history. I’m sure that’s the plan.

***also in the Jones camp.

If you take BPA guys, that means you take overslot guys frequently and you don't have draft capital.  So do you actually get the MOST talent that way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would melt this board down, but I keep looking at Jacob Berry. Berry, Lee and Cross are Elias/Sig kind of guys. I watched some video on Berry, along with some interviews. Best hit/power combo. Not as big as I thought he was, not sure he’s quite 6’0”. But another switch hitter with power, who is a little more athletic than I thought. 

Certainly not the best talent available at 1-1, but if they want an under slot deal on an advanced bat still, Berry might be in play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

If you take BPA guys, that means you take overslot guys frequently and you don't have draft capital.  So do you actually get the MOST talent that way?

Would you rather have two all stars, or four solid players? Where you stand depends on where you sit. The answer depends on your existing depth and how you value the two all stars. They did the depth play a few times now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

It would melt this board down, but I keep looking at Jacob Berry. Berry, Lee and Cross are Elias/Sig kind of guys. I watched some video on Berry, along with some interviews. Best hit/power combo. Not as big as I thought he was, not sure he’s quite 6’0”. But another switch hitter with power, who is a little more athletic than I thought. 

Certainly not the best talent available at 1-1, but if they want an under slot deal on an advanced bat still, Berry might be in play. 

Worst pick possible 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think Norby is going to be a very good MLB offensive player. I’m ok trading him but not for 1/2 season rental types.
    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...