Jump to content

2021 Orioles #5 Prospect - DL Hall -LHP


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

I am interested in what is the minimum acceptable walk rate for a starter.

Scott is incredibly undependable, and his successful appearances don’t compensate for his bad ones. It doesn’t matter how talented he is unless he can pitch better than he does.

It would be beyond awful if Hall ended up in the same category. I’ve never compared the two, I’m not sure one even can compare the two, but anytime someone mentions an elevated walk rate, that’s what comes to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

What changed between this year and last year that caused you to elevate him one spot, especially over Gunnar who was one spot ahead last year?

I’m sure Tony will answer, but Hall was much better in 2021 than in 2019, plus some of the reports from the alt site in 2020 had him really struggling to throw strikes, which really wasn’t a huge problem in 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I’m sure Tony will answer, but Hall was much better in 2021 than in 2019, plus some of the reports from the alt site in 2020 had him really struggling to throw strikes, which really wasn’t a huge problem in 2021.

Yes but we are still talking a very small Sample size.  Basically, this is more about Hall or Henderson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

What changed between this year and last year that caused you to elevate him one spot, especially over Gunnar who was one spot ahead last year?

I can't speak for Tony but I think Hall's numbers at AA before going down were very impressive while Gunnar's had a significant slump that raises some questions. Hall probably rocked the "eye test" harder than anybody on the list this year outside of maybe Grayson and I know Tony watches these guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

What changed between this year and last year that caused you to elevate him one spot, especially over Gunnar who was one spot ahead last year?

Once you see Gunnar's profile it will be more obvious. Hall's control improvements were a factor as well as his ceiling.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Hall could be the key to the Orioles avoiding another 15 year drought of losing

I’m afraid to get excited about Hall because as good as he is it’s his health that worries me even more. 

I’m honestly not worried that the O’s will have a losing team for 14 straight seasons as they did from 1998-2011.   That’s the whole point of the tear-down/rebuild vs. dying the death of 1000 cuts.   What I do worry about is that we’ll do all this and then only get to a Toronto-like level, hoping for the occasional wild card and finishing under .500 roughly half the time.   Getting to the top in this division is really, really tough.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m honestly not worried that the O’s will have a losing team for 14 straight seasons as they did from 1998-2011.   That’s the whole point of the tear-down/rebuild vs. dying the death of 1000 cuts.   What I do worry about is that we’ll do all this and then only get to a Toronto-like level, hoping for the occasional wild card and finishing under .500 roughly half the time.   Getting to the top in this division is really, really tough.  

It isn't the whole point.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have observed over the years that lefties, for what ever reason, sometimes take longer to get command to be in line.  I think of Koufax and several others here.  Therefore I often give them a longer leash that righties.  I know it is the time of year to dream big, but if he and Grayson do turn out to be  good TORS, and slot Means in at #3,  that is what championship teams are built of.   I say, no charge to dream.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

It isn't the whole point.

 

49 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

In fact, it’s a minor part of the point because it’s an unnecessary exercise, especially for the length of time they are doing it for.

I disagree.   That’s why they did it.   If there are other benefits, they’re incidental to the main objective, in my opinion.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m honestly not worried that the O’s will have a losing team for 14 straight seasons as they did from 1998-2011.   That’s the whole point of the tear-down/rebuild vs. dying the death of 1000 cuts.   What I do worry about is that we’ll do all this and then only get to a Toronto-like level, hoping for the occasional wild card and finishing under .500 roughly half the time.   Getting to the top in this division is really, really tough.  

I just don't think we can ever expect to dominate the division for extended periods. We have three major market teams we are competing against plus Tampa, another well run organization. The law of averages says we might compete from time but it's hard to roll a five sided die and come up number one every time. Not only do we have to do everything right but you have to have multiple teams underperform for an extended period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I just don't think we can ever expect to dominate the division for extended periods. We have three major market teams we are competing against plus Tampa, another well run organization. The law of averages says we might compete from time but it's hard to roll a five sided die and come up number one every time. Not only do we have to do everything right but you have to have multiple teams underperform for an extended period.

Yea no one dominates this division, it’s a gauntlet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Completely disagree about Orr. He will be fine. His defense has been better in its first few games compared to McDonald’s first few games.     And some of these big passing stats are over exaggerated. There have been mistakes for sure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...