Jump to content

The Teixeira Watch: Part V - AM says the O's "have flexibility" on Tex


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Although that report doesn't look good, many people are making giant assumptions. Is this Boras inviting them down? It could just be Boston deciding to go to Boras in person and finally putting their final offer on the table as they do not want to play the waiting game anymore. Does not mean Boras won't then take their final offer and go back to the O's and see if they top it.

Also, don't forget that when Boras was in the area, we got reports of Boston and the Nats meeting with Boras and Tex but nothing on AM meeting with Tex and Boras. We only found out during the winter meetings when AM told the media.

Everyone needs to step back and just let the dust settle. It definitely looks bad but there is still some glimmer of hope.

I also want to believe in the hope because Sonny76 has been very accurate when he's posted and I do not remember any of his posts proving to be completely wrong. I think his contacts never said the Roberts trade was done, and he has definitely got a great track record on his other predictions like the Perlozzo firing. He's hinted that the O's offer is higher that 9/180 or 10/200 so I'm holding out hope that he is accurate again. If the O's will or have offered that much, then I think the Tex will sign with the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess we, as fans, are the ones to blame. The FO never hyped up a potential signing of Teixiera and have rarely commented on interest. We have been building up his return home for a few years now and set ourselves up for drastic disappointment. Oh well.... :rolleyestf:

They couldn't or it would've been tampering. He was employed by another organization.

The first chance they'd have had to talk it up at all would've been in mid-November when he hit the open market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Happen to catch the O’s game? Was it boring?
    • Dude's a Yankee killer.  I like him as an innings eater sp but I don't think he'll ever be a great pitcher. I recall looking at his stats thru one, two, three times they the lineup and seeing him do very well the first two times. I feel like he could be a stud long reliever. 
    • There really haven’t been too many close pennant races involving the Yankees and the Orioles.   These are the closest finishes: 2012: Yankees 95, Orioles 93 (O’s eliminated in game 162; last held the lead in game 159) 1997: Orioles 98, Yankees 96 (Yankees eliminated in game 161; O’s led wire to wire) 1974: Orioles 91, Yankees 89 (Yankees eliminated in game 161; last held the lead in game 154) 1964: Yankees 99, Orioles 97 (O’s eliminated in game 160; last held the lead in game 151) 1980: Yankees 103, Orioles 100 (O’s eliminated in game 160; last held the lead in game 9) 1977: Yankees 100, Orioles 97 (O’s eliminated in game 159; last held the lead in game 105)  1996: Yankees 92, Orioles 88 (O’s eliminated in game 159; last held the lead in game 49). This year’s race is the next-closest, and there’s really nothing else that was even remotely close.  
    • They said 1st triple play to end a game since 2009.  So yeah, it's probably never happened to end a game to clinch a playoff spot.    
    • And yes, Ohtani-Betts-Freeman were coming next so they were in big trouble before the triple play.
    • I hope youre wrong too, but I think you are right.
    • 4-2 Padres bottom of the 9th, Dodgers have bases runners at 1st and 2nd none out. Robert Suarez is on the verge of blowing yet another save having already given up 3 straight hits. The ball is hit sharply to Manny who gets the ball and runs back to 3rd, then swings the ball around the horn for a Triple play.  And that play clinches a playoff berth for the Padres.  Wonder if that has ever happened, a triple play that clinches a playoff berth, probably not.  Hell of an ending!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...