Jump to content

Friday May 27: Orioles begin 5 game series in Boston, tonight exclusively on AppleTV


SteveA

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Because someone decided there was a buck to be made by switching your access. And there's not a whole lot you or I or any of us can do about it.

Except quit watching their product altogether.

I've given up the NBA and NFL (except for a rare network game once in a blue moon), I'm just not ready to drop my MLB habit.  Especially with a promising window of Orioles baseball on the horizon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Surprised that cable is still at 720. Must look awful on a big 4k TV.

I think it's limited by the old coaxial cables. Verizon and others started to switch to fiber optics which can get the higher definition 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yossarian said:

I dropped cable years ago in favor of YouTube TV. It has worked well for me

I got a chance to compare my sister’s YouTube TV to my Sling last month and prefer Sling but it really depends on your desired channels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PHRESH said:

I think it's limited by the old coaxial cables. Verizon and others started to switch to fiber optics which can get the higher definition 

I have FIOS and the MASN picture quality pales in comparison to the broadcast tonight. It's weird because the same wires are transmitting Apple TV+ broadcast just that it's over the internet instead of cable tv. 

I'm sure there's some reason, but I don't know why MASN's picture quality can't be closer to what we're seeing tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I have FIOS and the MASN picture quality pales in comparison to the broadcast tonight. It's weird because the same wires are transmitting Apple TV+ broadcast just that it's over the internet instead of cable tv. 

I'm sure there's some reason, but I don't know why MASN's picture quality can't be closer to what we're seeing tonight. 

Maybe they're using cameras from 1997. Is it wide screen at least? Lol

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Apple may have dropped Heidi Watney from the baseball games. If there's any game she would have done it wd have been this one (former Red Sox broadcaster). (Reviews of the broadcasts have been pretty weak.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PHRESH said:

Maybe they're using cameras from 1997. Is it wide screen at least? Lol

Well, I'm sure part of it is MASN's production values, but anything on cable looks worse than streaming platforms.

I don't who watches NFL, but CBS has always had better picture quality than Fox and it's probably the equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...