Jump to content

The Orioles OPS Leader Horse Race


Frobby

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, baltfan said:

Urias actually leads the team in WAR.  I would love to take credit for discovering that but I read it on Reddit.

In bwar he's tied with Cedric, in fwar he's very slightly behind Cedric and Adley. Either way he's been very good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Filmstudy said:

OK, I am interested in this and think I understand the old SB rules, but I don't see 37 in a column and can't add up the numbers to get to 37.  I am seeing 20 + 9 + 2 +11 for 42.

This is a very silly exercise but I think what I did was 21 steals minus six caught plus nine first-to-thirds, plus two scores from first on a double, plus 11 scores from second on a single, minus three outs on bases... but that's not right so maybe I double counted something.

The easy, non-goofy solution is to just look at the Rbaser total under value and it takes all that stuff and converts it into runs above/below average  For Mullins that's +2.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Filmstudy said:

I hope all of these players hit the cover off the ball the rest of the way, but this looks like Rutschman's race to lose now and he's the most likely to turn it into Secretariat's Belmont stretch run.

Most posters are too young to remember that, but how exciting that was.  Back when everyone actually still paid attention to the Triple Crown races and no horse had swept them in 25 years.  What Secretariat did in the home stretch was the equivalent of what Roy Hobbs did in the last scene of The Natural (feel-good movie version), complete with the light stantions exploding.   One of the most thrilling sports events I’ve witnessed.  And yes, I suspect Rutschman may put that kind of distance between him and his teammates in the OPS race before it’s over.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Switch hitters are now .800, and if you're not you've fallen off to .750, .725 or .700.

The team may or may not be near its High Water mark, but it is with more than a little excitement I've been watching the Rutschman OBP ascent (OPS so clumsy with SLG on its 4.000 scale to OBP's 1.000).    0-for-2 with 2 walks is kind of becoming the trademark game.

Today's .365 closing in on the League Top 10, the anchor of bad Month1 notwithstanding.

Kikuchi was the Jays easy setting...the matchups tonight and tomorrow more Must See.   Entering the year before the Yankees explosion, I figured (and kind of do still figure) the Jays not the Yankees would be harder to catch up with in the next couple years, so how the Early Adley Teams lineups do against the long-term Manoah-Berrios-Gausman problem is big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

And in the least shocking development of the year, the winner ends up being Adley Rutschman, with an .806.  I feel like he varied from around .790 to .815 for the last 2 months of the season or so.

Rounding out the podium among qualified individuals was Santander with a .773 and Mountcastle with a .729.  Mancini had a .751 with us if you want to count him.

Really ended up being a 2-horse race, and the lack of production from guys like Hays, Mountcastle and Urias is probably what ultimately led to this team falling a bit short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...