Jump to content

Jorge Lopez traded to Twins for pitching prospects (edit)


interloper

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The past can't be changed, but to say that trading Lopez away didn't effect bullpen strategy, roles, and usage, would just be untrue.  Khriebiel, and Reed, were in some higher than ideal leverage situations last Aug/Sept.  

 

Bullpen roles matter.  We all saw that when Brach had to be the "closer" that year, and Donnie Hart was asked to do more than be a LOOGY.  Domino effect.  

Arguably, promoting Bautista to closer won us a bunch of ballgames that Jorge might have blown. We just don't know and shouldn't assume anything either way. 

If you want to be extremely charitable, you could assume Jorge would have maintained his level of production before being traded. He had 1.9 WAR at the time for us, so lets say he puts up another 1.0 WAR the rest of the way. We finished 3 games out, but lost tiebreakers to SEA and TB, so really needed to make up 4 games. (Krehbiel gave up a run in a win vs TB and had a shutout inning in a loss vs TB, so he did not cost us the tiebreaker; we didn't play SEA after the trade). Even if you assume slight negative WAR for Krehbiel I don't think you're going to get to 4 wins.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Not so funny when we probably missed the playoffs because we relied more heavily on Krhiebel and Baker.  Then we tried filling the empty spot in the pen with Jake Reed.  Real funny.  

Highly doubtful that trading Lopez caused us to miss the playoffs.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lts funny to me that Elias trades us a reliever that nets us a reliever that appears to be at least equally as good (the sample size frankly isn't THAT much smaller than Lopez' own as a late inning guy), a pitching prospect that has turned a few heads in AA so far this year, AND two lottery tickets, and STILL can get lambasted by some posters on here, almost a year later.

Some people just won't be happy, ever.  They just won't. 

If that trade was for Cano straight up, at this point it would STILL look like a good trade - though roasting it last summer would have been much more appropriate.  But it was for him and three other guys.  Its called building and contending simultaneously.  I trust Elias can do that, and there's starting to be evidence to support that.  Do I agree with every ounce of roster management?  No of course not - burying Westburg and Cowser so far, the third catcher thing, etc. But is there anyone else around baseball who can do an overall better job for the Os?  Probably not.

I'm happy we have Elias, and I'm happy he had the balls to make this trade and the Mancini trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Man, can you imagine the OH still talking about the Glenn Davis trade a year later?  What would this place be like if we were around for the Eddie Murray trade?

I was thinking the Milt Pappas trade.  "You gave up a 26 year young SP, a still young reliever AND an outfield prospect for a 30 year old has been!!!!" I am sure some would say...."Sure Frank Robinson helped us win a couple of WS, and yes flags fly forever....but we could have been a dynasty!!!!" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, foxfield said:

I was thinking the Milt Pappas trade.  "You gave up a 26 year young SP, a still young reliever AND an outfield prospect for a 30 year old has been!!!!" I am sure some would say...."Sure Frank Robinson helped us win a couple of WS, and yes flags fly forever....but we could have been a dynasty!!!!" 

Yeah, Milt Pappas.  I was just going back to trades that were made that I remember.  Have a faint memory of running Eddie Murray out of town and vivid memories of how bad Glenn Davis was while the trio we parted with went on to great careers.

I've just always felt that the 1990s look way different if Eddie's here and the Davis trade didn't happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

“Mr. 99 mph sinker” AKA Jorge Lopez came in with a 9-4 lead to start the 9th, retired none of the 4 hitters he faced and was taken out.

He now has a 3.68 ERA and seems to be in the kind of funk where he will not get as many high leverage spots.  Today certainly wasn’t one.

Last 15 games.  13 innings. 6.08 ERA, 1.73 WHIP, 7 walks, 11 strikeouts.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

In 50 total appearances for the Twins, these are Jorge’s cumulative stats.

46.2 IP

45 hits

24 walks

8 HBP

7 home runs 

39 strikeouts 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There still could have been to know exactly when he would regress and trade him at peak value to fleece the Twins even more than we did /s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

In 50 total appearances for the Twins, these are Jorge’s cumulative stats.

46.2 IP

45 hits

24 walks

8 HBP

7 home runs 

39 strikeouts 

1.31 ERA in his first 21 appearances this year, 24.30 over the last 6.   Ah, the life of a reliever!   Jorge is a class act and I hope he regains his footing.   

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...