Jump to content

Markakis vs other young players


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

I'm a big fan of Nick Markakis and I thought the thread was dead. I was the first post. It got to me then and it gets to me now. The question should have been worded differently. As it stands it's an insult.

No it's not. It can be seen as a compliment that Nick is one of the better young players in the game. But regardless, no one is putting Nick down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm a big fan of Nick Markakis and I thought the thread was dead. I was the first post. It got to me then and it gets to me now. The question should have been worded differently. As it stands it's an insult.

So this is the "get on your knees and slobber the Orioles forum?"

Is it an insult to hold the opinion that there are other players in MLB better than particular Orioles? Or just regarding Nick?

If you think others are shortchanging Nick, call them out with reasoned, well thought out posts. Demonstrate you are right, or why you think you are.

But censorship, more so when capricious and discriminatory, has no valid place. This is a much better place the more honest, reasoned and collective it becomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this is the "get on your knees and slobber the Orioles forum?"

Is it an insult to hold the opinion that there are other players in MLB better than particular Orioles? Or just regarding Nick?

If you think others are shortchanging Nick, call them out with reasoned, well thought out posts. Demonstrate you are right, or why you think you are.

But censorship, more so when capricious and discriminatory, has no valid place. This is a much better place the more honest, reasoned and collective it becomes.

I thought I did.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I did.:rolleyes:

If you think others are shortchanging Nick, call them out with reasoned, well thought out posts. Demonstrate you are right, or why you think you are.

You have presented absolutely no basis as to why you believe Nick is more valuable than anyone else mentioned in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think others are shortchanging Nick, call them out with reasoned, well thought out posts. Demonstrate you are right, or why you think you are.

You have presented absolutely no basis as to why you believe Nick is more valuable than anyone else mentioned in this thread.

I said I disagree with the whole premise of this thread as it was originally proposed. This isn't fantasy baseball. Markakis is one of the few homegrown O's we have had to celebrate on this team. I'm not arguing stats so put your calculator away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said I disagree with the whole premise of this thread as it was originally proposed. This isn't fantasy baseball. Markakis is one of the few homegrown O's we have had to celebrate on this team. I'm not arguing stats so put your calculator away.

Exactly my point.

We are here for reasoned, well thought-out posts and debate.

You have abstained from answering: "So this is the "get on your knees and slobber the Orioles forum?" Care to?

Censorship = teh suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly my point.

We are here for reasoned, well thought-out posts and debate.

You have not yet disagreed with the notion that this is not the the "get on your knees and slobber the Orioles forum." Care to?

Censorship = teh suck.

This is a little over my head. Step out of your "police car" and explain yourself a little more clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a little over my head. Step out of your "police car" and explain yourself a little more clearly.

Is it an insult to hold the opinion that there are other players in MLB better than particular Orioles? Or just regarding Nick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can do better. Please do so. This is silly. No need to act like a clown.

Originally Posted by Baltimoron View Post

Is it an insult to hold the opinion that there are other players in MLB better than particular Orioles? Or just regarding Nick?

When was that ever expressed by me?

Uh.....why don't you quote me on it then. You know the little button on the right....... :rolleyes:

OK:

The original question was which players with 3 years or less MLB experience would you rather have than Markakis. So what you're saying here is that Markakis isn't good enough for you and you would rather have all those other players listed here instead of Nick Markakis. OK, fine that's your opinion. Maybe those guys are good , but I think this thread is a complete insult to Markakis. It's like you saying directly to Markakis "You're good Nick and you have potential, but we prefer the following instead of you:........"
I'm a big fan of Nick Markakis and I thought the thread was dead. I was the first post. It got to me then and it gets to me now. The question should have been worded differently. As it stands it's an insult.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can do better. Please do so. This is silly. No need to act like a clown.

Well when you misunderstand the premise of the discourse your conclusions become flawed.

I'll explain it again just for you. The original question was posed as which players would you rather have than Markakis? Read it. It's there twice. My point was -Why pose this question in the first place? It sounds like "Nick's OK, but these guys we'd rather have instead." It should have been re-written to read "who is more valuable" or "who do you think is better." Which I think is what SG meant when he started it.

Read the rest of my posts in this thread. Then you'll get the full flavor of what my argument is. Just don't come at me with the post police routine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...