Jump to content

Are the Orioles done?


interloper

Are the Orioles done?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Are the Orioles done?

    • Yep - no more 40-man roster additions. They're rolling with who they have now.
    • Basically - maybe an O'Hearn type or two, but nothing serious.
    • Nah - I still think they'll sign a Wacha/Cueto/Greinke type starting pitcher.
    • Nah - big trade incoming that will reshape this off-season.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Twenty people believe there’s a trade before the season that changed the offseason?

Hmm

I said it when Elias was hired. Nothing of any significance will change until there’s new ownership. 

Actually, I questioned his ability to perform his duties with the current ownership. I’m still waiting for an impact signing. However, I think they may have a chance with the young guys. Of course, that assumes a big season from Adley, Gunnar and GrayRod and it’s likely at least one of that group has growing pains. 
 

I also hope Hall gets a real shot as a SP. Too many people didn’t recognize the strides he made in season and he’s always been a starter. His stint in the pen was useful, but that kid has electric stuff. 

Don’t get me wrong, Elias has been ok, but how much could he do if they loosened the purse strings? Yes, I know, the Frazier signing, but how bout that Gibson guy!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Il BuonO said:

Twenty people believe there’s a trade before the season that changed the offseason?

Hmm

Nice to see you drop by.  That poll is 5 weeks old, and before the Irvin trade.  I doubt many people are expecting a trade that significantly changes the offseason now.  I’m not implying that the Irvin trade was that significant, just that the trade made another, more significant trade for pitching less likely (plus it’s much later in the offseason now).   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Nice to see you drop by.  That poll is 5 weeks old, and before the Irvin trade.  I doubt many people are expecting a trade that significantly changes the offseason now.  I’m not implying that the Irvin trade was that significant, just that the trade made another, more significant trade for pitching less likely (plus it’s much later in the offseason now).   

If Irvin gets 20+ starts (and it looks like he will) the trade will have been significant, like it or not.  Might not be a big FA signing like we were all hoping for but it'll have had a significant impact on this team for this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too much out there in the remaining FA. 4th bench options to compete with Vavra could be an a option. The best fits look like Peralta, Dickerson, and Bradley, if we wanted to go the LH OF bat option. Profar is still out there. Sano, Voit, Gurriel, are out there too, if we wanted to go the 1B/DH option, but they are RH. 
 

I imagine the waiver wire won’t have as good quality since it seems like every team has a guy or two to put on the 60 day IL. 
 

I expect to see some movement on the remaining bats and RPs after 2/15. Profar still could be an option for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

Nice to see you drop by.  That poll is 5 weeks old, and before the Irvin trade.  I doubt many people are expecting a trade that significantly changes the offseason now.  I’m not implying that the Irvin trade was that significant, just that the trade made another, more significant trade for pitching less likely (plus it’s much later in the offseason now).   

Thanks….wonder who is affected most by that trade. Will Irvin and Gibson be traded if the young guys are doing well and the team is competitive? I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does 60-day IL reactivate next week the very first day camps open?

By this point as tight a ship as Elias runs and as precious as he is about roster spots, if he has one more transaction buying Talent for $$$ I don't rule out that its already a tacit agreement with Profar, Wacha, Moore/Chafin, whoever, and he simply doesn't want to DFA someone because he doesn't have to.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Profar fits more than it seems until you take a deeper dive. 
 

1. He’s a 29 yo SH that showed really good OBP skills last year. His LH power should play up in OPACY. 
 

2. He kicks Santander to permanent DH. That’s the best way to maximize Santander’s bat and health. Also, overall team defense. 
 

3. We don’t have to rush Cowser, or a Westburg/Norby OF conversion. 
 

4. That frees up Cowser to be traded for a TOR SP at the deadline, with Profar helping to bridge the gap to Kjerstad, Mayo, Beavers, and Fabian. 
 

5. We aren’t forced to roll with not ideal fits. Like Vavra, or signing RH FA like Sano/Voit. And having to play Santander in RF. 
 

There’s really no such thing as a “bad” one year deal. If we need to go for two to sign him, with option possibilities, then it gets tricky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...