Jump to content

Are the Orioles done?


interloper

Are the Orioles done?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Are the Orioles done?

    • Yep - no more 40-man roster additions. They're rolling with who they have now.
    • Basically - maybe an O'Hearn type or two, but nothing serious.
    • Nah - I still think they'll sign a Wacha/Cueto/Greinke type starting pitcher.
    • Nah - big trade incoming that will reshape this off-season.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I think they are probably done for now. Slight chance of them signing a Wacha / Cuetto, but only if they accept a 1 yr deal. The Orioles front office absolutely punted this off-season. My guess is they only acquire something at the trade deadline, and that's only if the team is firmly in the chase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only reason i voted for a trade is not because we have needs + surplus assets that fit others needs to deal but also because other teams that have had lackluster offseasons also with needs + surplus in assets that we need... big trade might not be what happens but i think there will be one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of the above. I think Elias make two trades.  One.  An outfielder like Kepler, who won’t cost much.  Two.  A starting pitcher.  Some like Lopez, Carrasco, Snell, or someone else.  At this point leaning towards someone on the last year of a contract that also won’t require much capital back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

None of the above. I think Elias make two trades.  One.  An outfielder like Kepler, who won’t cost much.  Two.  A starting pitcher.  Some like Lopez, Carrasco, Snell, or someone else.  At this point leaning towards someone on the last year of a contract that also won’t require much capital back.

I would say that's #4. Those trades definitely reshape the off-season IMO anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, interloper said:

I continue to feel like they have a SP signing in them, albeit a non-exciting one, so I voted for the 3rd option. However, I am not so optimistic to think they will surprise us with a miracle trade. 

I would rather they go with what they have than sign someone like Wacha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

None of the above. I think Elias make two trades.  One.  An outfielder like Kepler, who won’t cost much.  Two.  A starting pitcher.  Some like Lopez, Carrasco, Snell, or someone else.  At this point leaning towards someone on the last year of a contract that also won’t require much capital back.

I’m interested to know what indication you have that Elias is willing/capable to make a trade that involves more than minimal roster impact. He hasn’t made any trade or signing that was of any significance his entire tenure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, waroriole said:

I’m interested to know what indication you have that Elias is willing/capable to make a trade that involves more than minimal roster impact. He hasn’t made any trade or signing that was of any significance his entire tenure. 

He said he wanted to acquire a #1 -3 starter via FA or trade.  He also said he wanted to acquire a “platoon type of outfielder”.   Despite all of the craziness on OH, I actually think he does what he says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

He said he wanted to acquire a #1 -3 starter via FA or trade.  He also said he wanted to acquire a “platoon type of outfielder”.   Despite all of the craziness on OH, I actually think he does what he says.

I think he views Gibson as that SP, or at least will try to spin it that way. You can already see Roch trying to make the case that OHearn is that LH 1B/OF type. There’s just no indication that he views this group as ready to win now. His big acquisition at the trade deadline last year was Aguilar. For whatever reason, he doesn’t seem to believe in this group, or at least not yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He said he wanted to acquire a #1 -3 starter via FA or trade.  He also said he wanted to acquire a “platoon type of outfielder”.   Despite all of the craziness on OH, I actually think he does what he says.

I think he wanted to do all of this and ownership reached out to him and was like "um, we are not loosening the purse strings like you may have thought," and Elias has had to change his goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

I think he wanted to do all of this and ownership reached out to him and was like "um, we are not loosening the purse strings like you may have thought," and Elias has had to change his goals.

We disagree but your speculation is possible.  I think John Angelos and Elias have been on the same page all along.  I don’t think he had the rug pulled out from him.

From the very beginning he said “a lot” of this years payroll increase would come from arbitration.   Some posters envisioned getting both Verlander and Correa.  Now they’re upset.

Liftoff is whatever the beholder seems to want it to mean but all Elias really said that from this point forward he felt the team was in a great place and an upward trajectory.  Posters who read too much into that are now upset.  The team is in a great place and the off season isn’t over.  Chill.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this list on MLB Trade Rumors under "Starting Pitcher Free Agents" USED TO BE 40 Names Long >>>>> 

Starting Pitchers

Chase Anderson (35)
Chris Archer (34)
Kohei Arihara (30)
Dylan Bundy (30)
Johnny Cueto (37)
Zach Davies (30)
Danny Duffy (34)
Zack Greinke (39)
Drew Hutchison (32)
Dallas Keuchel (35)
Chad Kuhl (30)
Wade Miley (36)
Mike Minor (35)
Michael Pineda (34)
Joe Ross (30)
Aaron Sanchez (30)
Anibal Sanchez (39)
Michael Wacha (31)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...