Jump to content

Three thoughts on the pitch clock


interloper

Recommended Posts

So there are 2 things that I really dislike about the pitch clock.

Number 1, and easily the biggest problem that I have with it, is that I do not like that I'm going to most likely spend more total time in my drive to the stadium and home from the stadium, then I'm going to spend at the actual stadium. Living on the Eastern Shore, driving a little over an hour each way, I actually want to spend 3 hours in the stadium. Now on the flip side, I don't want to spend 4 and not get home until 1 AM, but I want to spend more then 2 hours there also. 

Number 2, I don't want the game to feel "rushed". And part of that is just getting used to it which will eventually happen,  but even after getting used to it, I still feel like 15 seconds just is quite an extremely fast number for a pitcher to catch the ball, get on the rubber, choose which pitch he wants to throw (especially at the end of a game in a crucial situation), and throw the ball.

I'm not opposed to speeding the game up and preventing the 4 hour baseball games. I just think they could have done a 30 second pitch clock which most likely would have prevented the 4 hour games, while also preventing the two biggest concerns that I have with it above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, overall, I like it and feel it just needs a little tweaking. The 15 seconds feels a little rushed and watching that clock get to 1 is a bit nerve wracking from a fan stand point in my opinion. Of course I'm a Ravens fan so I feel that on just about every snap as well. :D

Maybe having 20 seconds as the pitch clock no matter what is a little better. And as I said before n a previous post, "I do think they should have two manager called "clock resets" per game. That way if the clock is about to expire and the pitcher loses his concentration for a second, a manager has a chance to call it before it runs out and the pitcher gets charged with ball or balk."

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RVAOsFan said:

Someone else posted in this thread about how great this would be for young families.  I read that and immediately thought, this person does not have a young family.  I am going to miss half the game every night for my kids bedtime routine haha. 

Agreed. It's great for young families when those young families to go the games (which for most families is a few times a year at most), but it impacts the other way on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BrendanPlutschak said:

So there are 2 things that I really dislike about the pitch clock.

Number 1, and easily the biggest problem that I have with it, is that I do not like that I'm going to most likely spend more total time in my drive to the stadium and home from the stadium, then I'm going to spend at the actual stadium. Living on the Eastern Shore, driving a little over an hour each way, I actually want to spend 3 hours in the stadium. Now on the flip side, I don't want to spend 4 and not get home until 1 AM, but I want to spend more then 2 hours there also. 

Number 2, I don't want the game to feel "rushed". And part of that is just getting used to it which will eventually happen,  but even after getting used to it, I still feel like 15 seconds just is quite an extremely fast number for a pitcher to catch the ball, get on the rubber, choose which pitch he wants to throw (especially at the end of a game in a crucial situation), and throw the ball.

I'm not opposed to speeding the game up and preventing the 4 hour baseball games. I just think they could have done a 30 second pitch clock which most likely would have prevented the 4 hour games, while also preventing the two biggest concerns that I have with it above.

I'm much the same here. I will have to adjust how I approach going to games. I'll have to get there earlier to enjoy what the stadium has to offer pre-game. I wonder if teams adjust to this and open the park earlier to allow more time for fans to do this (or perhaps not and I'm one of very few that would adjust in this way). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jamalshw said:

I'm much the same here. I will have to adjust how I approach going to games. I'll have to get there earlier to enjoy what the stadium has to offer pre-game. I wonder if teams adjust to this and open the park earlier to allow more time for fans to do this (or perhaps not and I'm one of very few that would adjust in this way). 

I haven't heard anything about the O's opening the stadium more than an hour before game time, which was what they did for the past 2 years. They absolutely need to go back to opening 2 hours before, like they did pre-Covid. There's no excuse any more to only let fans in 60 minutes before the game starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, orioles119 said:

The ghost-runner needs to go too.  It was warranted during the pandemic season, but now?  It needs to go.

I agree completely. Especially now with the pitch clock, the ghost-runner is completely unnecessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

The clock will help the product, but it does change baseball's special place as "the sport without a clock".

That’s not what the saying means.  It’s a reference to 9 innings; both teams get 27 outs; you can’t build a lead and run the clock like football or basketball and others.  There’s still no game clock.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did you all feel about MASN displaying the clock by the score? I think it needs some tweaking (we don't need to see it between batters or when someone is running in from the bullpen). I didn't hate it, but it did pull my attention way from the center of the screen, which isn't great. The folks at Camden Chat reallllllly hate it lol. I don't mind having it, but in typical MASN fashion it's kind of messy how they implemented it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giving the manager two timeouts is an interesting thought.  Also, if it invariably ends up at 25/20 seconds instead of 20/15, that's fine, but I've watched several games and I'm not seeing any problems with 20/15.  

Beyond that, I still haven't heard one argument against this that carries any real weight.  Is being at the stadium 25 minutes less really an issue?  That's one fewer $9 Miller Lite while watching hitters adjust their batting gloves 200 times.  These stadiums are in cities.  If you want to hang more before and/or after then do it.  

The comments from Manny and Soto are laughable.  Manny could jog from the on deck circle to second base, hug his teammate who just doubled, jog back to home plate, take two practice swings and still have time left on the 30 second clock.  In roughly the same time, NFL teams can sub multiple players in and out, have 11 guys huddle up to coordinate a complex play, allow everyone to get to their positions all over the field, and possibly audible/move personnel around after that.   So how much time does Soto need to contemplate a 3-1 pitch?  Sit on the fastball, Juan!!

All major sports leagues are concerned that younger people aren't interested in their product.  It's a big part of rule changes favoring offense, embracing the once toxic gambling environment, turning stadiums into entertainment complexes, and so forth.  Far too many people consider baseball boring.  Changes like this are very needed if it's going to thrive.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

How did you all feel about MASN displaying the clock by the score? I think it needs some tweaking (we don't need to see it between batters or when someone is running in from the bullpen). I didn't hate it, but it did pull my attention way from the center of the screen, which isn't great. The folks at Camden Chat reallllllly hate it lol. I don't mind having it, but in typical MASN fashion it's kind of messy how they implemented it. 

I thought it was okay and didn't really mind it.  It pulled my attention away from the pitcher/catcher a bit to begin with but after awhile I was able to focus on the players and not the clock.  

I'm not sure what else they should do in order to display the clock.  I guess they could have it superimposed behind the batter, kind of like they have those frames with for the fake advertisements that rotate in and out but aren't really there in person and only visible on your TV.  That way it's part of what you're looking at and your eyes don't have to travel too far from the clock to the players.

 

21 minutes ago, Ripken said:

 

All major sports leagues are concerned that younger people aren't interested in their product.  It's a big part of rule changes favoring offense, embracing the once toxic gambling environment, turning stadiums into entertainment complexes, and so forth.  Far too many people consider baseball boring.  Changes like this are very needed if it's going to thrive.

Agreed.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2023 at 6:53 PM, HakunaSakata said:

Implementing the pitch clock is just as much about making the game the way it used to be as it is trying to appeal to a younger generation.  Sure it will take some getting used to, but the baseball purist argument really doesn't hold any water based on the average length of games over time. 

 

  • The average length of a MLB game in 1940 was about 2 hours and 4 minutes. 
  • The average length of a MLB game in 1980 was about 2 hours and 33 minutes. 
  • The average length of a MLB game in 2022 was about 3 hours and 2 minutes. 

I also wonder how much advertising plays into this. I don’t know the commercial lengths in each decade or where they started having commercials but I’m assuming it’s a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, rm5678 said:

I haven't heard anything about the O's opening the stadium more than an hour before game time, which was what they did for the past 2 years. They absolutely need to go back to opening 2 hours before, like they did pre-Covid. There's no excuse any more to only let fans in 60 minutes before the game starts.

I understand the main reason they haven't opened earlier is because they couldn't get enough employees to work the stadium since covid.  Like many of the service industry there has been a shortage of labor.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spakman said:

I also wonder how much advertising plays into this. I don’t know the commercial lengths in each decade or where they started having commercials but I’m assuming it’s a factor.

There's probably multiple factors. Per Baseball Reference, teams used an average of 2.5 pitchers per game in 1980, vs 4.3 per game in 2022. Additionally, the average number of pitches thrown per game for a team had gone up from 136 per game in 1988 to 147 per game in 2009 (per BBRef again; they don't appear to have that info for any other years). So, to get to the same 2:30 game length, you have to squeeze in an average of 4 additional pitching changes and 8-10% more pitches, in addition to any increase in commercial breaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, accinfo said:

I understand the main reason they haven't opened earlier is because they couldn't get enough employees to work the stadium since covid.  Like many of the service industry there has been a shortage of labor.  

The Orioles last year were the only team in MLB to not open the gates on Friday and Saturday at least 1 1/2  hours before  first pitch.A few teams did an hour before M-TH. The Guardians did an hour before Sunday- Thursday. Some teams do two hours all the time and some on weekends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...