Jump to content

5/12: Pham K's 11


cboemmeljr

Recommended Posts

I thought about starting an Alex Pham thread, but I’ll just post some thoughts here.  He got knocked around in his first appearance of the year (3.1 IP, 7 R, 4 ER).  Since then, he’s allowed one run in his last five appearances combined, the last four of which were scoreless.  Yesterday was his first really big strikeout day, but he’s had more strikeouts than IP in all 6 of his appearances.  He’s allowed fewer hits than IP in every appearance except that first one, and in his last two, allowed only one hit in 5 innings. 

In short, Pham is firmly on my radar screen now.  If he can stay steady the next 4-6 starts, I think a promotion to Bowie may be in order.  
 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles seem to be good at teaching mediocre (and good prospects) prospects how to strike guys out at the lower levels.    I don't think Federman, Pham, etc. are prospects but they have moments when they have big strikeout games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The Orioles seem to be good at teaching mediocre (and good prospects) prospects how to strike guys out at the lower levels.    I don't think Federman, Pham, etc. are prospects but they have moments when they have big strikeout games.

I’m putting a bit more stock in Pham than I am in Federman and some of the others.   At 23, he’s not terribly old for Aberdeen.  Like I said, if he has a good 4-6 weeks he could find himself in Bowie, and then he becomes interesting.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m putting a bit more stock in Pham than I am in Federman and some of the others.   At 23, he’s not terribly old for Aberdeen.  Like I said, if he has a good 4-6 weeks he could find himself in Bowie, and then he becomes interesting.  

Ok.  I watched him pitch once on milb.tv and he didn't look like he had anything, but he must have something to get 11 K's in 5 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Ok.  I watched him pitch once on milb.tv and he didn't look like he had anything, but he must have something to get 11 K's in 5 innings.

I’m purely scouting the stat line.  Would be interested to know if @Tony-OHhas seen Pham this year and has any opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game.  Pham was dominating the whole night.  I don't recall even any loud outs.  He didn't light up the radar gun.  I only saw fastballs around 90 to 91, although I only checked occasionally.  I'm certainly no scout, but to my untrained eye, I also didn't see great movement on the off speed stuff.  The hitters couldn't make contact, but I couldn't see why he was so tough to hit.  When Virbitksy came in later, you could hear him popping the mitt louder than Pham, but both Virbitsky and Heid got rocked by the opposing team.  Maybe Pham is just a deceptive guy who mixed his pitches well and hits his spots.  I'm also curious if @Tony-OH thinks his stuff will play at higher levels.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/13/2023 at 10:27 AM, Frobby said:

I’m purely scouting the stat line.  Would be interested to know if @Tony-OHhas seen Pham this year and has any opinion.  

 

3 hours ago, DanS said:

I was at the game.  Pham was dominating the whole night.  I don't recall even any loud outs.  He didn't light up the radar gun.  I only saw fastballs around 90 to 91, although I only checked occasionally.  I'm certainly no scout, but to my untrained eye, I also didn't see great movement on the off speed stuff.  The hitters couldn't make contact, but I couldn't see why he was so tough to hit.  When Virbitksy came in later, you could hear him popping the mitt louder than Pham, but both Virbitsky and Heid got rocked by the opposing team.  Maybe Pham is just a deceptive guy who mixed his pitches well and hits his spots.  I'm also curious if @Tony-OH thinks his stuff will play at higher levels.

Never really been on my radar because of the lack of fastball velocity. He's a guy that has to prove it at every level or suddenly show big strikeout numbers against upper level hitters before I'd start to pay attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DanS said:

When Virbitksy came in later, you could hear him popping the mitt louder than Pham, but both Virbitsky and Heid got rocked by the opposing team.  

On a side note: Virbitsky has been terrible.  22 earned runs in 16.2 IP, WHIP over 2.00, 7 BB/9.  He’s been awful pretty much every time he’s taken the mound.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...