Jump to content

If you were Adley, what contract terms would you agree to today if offered?


kidrock

Recommended Posts

I don't know if anyone has seen this article from last year, but I think it's helpful to the topic...

https://birdswatcher.com/2022/08/19/adley-rutschman-extension-orioles/

 

Quote

 

After carefully combing through the information, I present to you an educated guess as to what Adley Rutschman’s potential contract extension could look like:

  • 2023: $6,000,000
  • 2024: $7,500,000
  • 2025: $12,500,000
  • 2026: $18,000,000
  • 2027: $24,000,000
  • 2028: $24,000,000
  • 2029: $27,500,000
  • 2030: $27,500,000

Total: 8 years, $147 million ($18.375 million AAV)

Rutschman will earn a full year of service time if he finishes in the top two in AL Rookie of the Year voting and considering his play, that is beginning to look like a formality. In that case, this extension would negate the remaining two years of making the minimum and his three arbitration years as well as “buying out” the first three years of his would-be free agency; the additional salary in 2023 and 2024 alone would pay Rutschman roughly $12 million more than he would earn playing for the minimum salary.

An eight year deal would also see Rutschman become a free agent at the age of 33 and while not guaranteed, it is entirely plausible that Rutschman will still be a valuable player who could continue to play and earn more money.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was the Orioles, I would probably flip that and front load it. We know what Adley is providing now, but we don't know what will happen that far in the future and it's always good to have some wiggle room to operate the rest of the team while other young stars are going to require extensions as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

If I was the Orioles, I would probably flip that and front load it. We know what Adley is providing now, but we don't know what will happen that far in the future and it's always good to have some wiggle room to operate the rest of the team while other young stars are going to require extensions as well.

Future money is worth less than present money.

Does 100 bucks go as far today as it did even three years ago?

It very rarely makes sense to front load a contact.  When you give a player a signing bonus you are essentially front loading the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Future money is worth less than present money.

Does 100 bucks go as far today as it did even three years ago?

It very rarely makes sense to front load a contact.  When you give a player a signing bonus you are essentially front loading the contract.

It made sense to front load in the 1930s lol! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/20/2023 at 12:22 PM, Sports Guy said:

So, are you saying to give him a 4/155ish extension?

That’s a huge amount for a catcher playing the first year of that extension at age 30

I understand what you are saying and I love some of the proposals being thrown around like 8/147 or 10/200 but most of us seem to agree that he will most likely not accept these offers and I was thinking of a number for us that he maybe would agree on. I just want to have him for at least 8 more years and what do we think his market value will be in 3,4 or 5 years from now, I'll bet it will be a lot. The dude is obviously going to get paid big time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, flaoriolesfan said:

I understand what you are saying and I love some of the proposals being thrown around like 8/147 or 10/200 but most of us seem to agree that he will most likely not accept these offers and I was thinking of a number for us that he maybe would agree on. I just want to have him for at least 8 more years and what do we think his market value will be in 3,4 or 5 years from now, I'll bet it will be a lot. The dude is obviously going to get paid big time!

I don’t understand why people keep saying he “probably won’t accept these offers”.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t understand why people keep saying he “probably won’t accept these offers”.

I don't pretend to speak for "people" but Boras, is the likely answer to your question. However, I agree with you, $300M is nonsense. He will enter FA as a 30 year old C, we have no way at this point to know what his physical condition will be nor how productive his bat will be re: a position change. He maybe has 6 years left at that point, what are teams going to give today for a 30-year old catcher 4+ years from now? Answer that question, add $45M for his ARB years and that's your offer. Maybe 6/$160, plus a signing bonus $5M you get to 10/$210M and the team assumes all performance risk. Give him an opt out after year 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

I don't pretend to speak for "people" but Boras, is the likely answer to your question. However, I agree with you, $300M is nonsense. He will enter FA as a 30 year old C, we have no way at this point to know what his physical condition will be nor how productive his bat will be re: a position change. He maybe has 6 years left at that point, what are teams going to give today for a 30-year old catcher 4+ years from now? Answer that question, add $45M for his ARB years and that's your offer. Maybe 6/$160, plus a signing bonus $5M you get to 10/$210M and the team assumes all performance risk. Give him an opt out after year 6.

What does Boras have to do with anything?

I think he's a Beverly Hills Sports Council client.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Brecht has TOR upside.  We’re good at finding #3-#5 types just in developing them, but we need that TOR arm upside and develop. 
    • I thought Baker had a better chance of getting a strikeout. Even though he created that mess it looked like he could have worked out of it.  Generally not in favor of bringing in guys for bases loaded situations unless they’re absolute nails and have an extremely high K rate.  Akin’s K rate is higher this year but I still don’t believe he was the better option than Baker. 
    • We’ve been picking really athletic types when not picking high in rd 1. Position player wise.   2023 - EBJ, Horvath, Josenberger, Cunningham, Etzel Not that are prior picks haven’t been athletic, if you know what I’m trying to say. We don’t take plodders as position players. 
    • Your complete mischaracterization of Os players aside, Miller is likely nothing more than a 60-70 IP reliever with high arm injury potential. (Note: when I say nothing more, I mean that as I don’t think they convert him to a starter next year or even if they do, I think he’s a ticking time bomb) I don’t care how old Kjerstad is, he’s a high end prospect that you control for 6 years and Stowers is an everyday OFer with big power potential. Sure, in a perfect world you get younger talent and if so, that’s fine..but if they got offered that and that was the best deal on the table, they should make the deal. FWIW, I think that deal would get beaten or they would get someone that maybe isn’t ranked as high as Kjerstad but someone younger and maybe more all around upside even if they come with a bigger risk.  
    • 100% in on Kirby. Wouldn’t require much on the prospect front. And has some track record.  That’ll require the Rangers to throw in the towel. Not sure they’re there, yet.
    • Yes to Crochet, absolutely not for Miller, yes to Skubal. Skubal will require a haul, though.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...