Jump to content

2023 Comp Round B (#63): Jackson Baumeister - RHP - (So) Florida State (FL)


Recommended Posts

Would have liked to have signed one of the high school kids too, but if they wouldn’t take what was left it’s hard to fault the Orioles.  I like the idea of taking a high end guy in the backend just in case one of the others falls through. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Just Regular said:

So...we have a big time NCAA guy pulling Connor Norby-ish pool money from Elias.     Let's see how this develops.

Is he close to Povich on Monday's power rankings?

Baumeister is lucky to be a top 30 guy at this point.  Nowhere close to Povich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Baumeister is lucky to be a top 30 guy at this point.  Nowhere close to Povich.

I'd say he's half way between Povich and #30. So #21ish. But we didn't draft him for what he's done. We drafted him for his traits. It's all about the potential upside, so his initial ranking isn't all that meaningful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Frobby said:

With all due respect to Tony, I don’t really care where he places the newbies on the list, until they’ve played in some pro games.  

No disrespect at all because I don't put them on until they have played at least one game! :D I have a general idea based off their profiles and draft status who will be on the lists and where though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, baltfan said:

kinda depressing Longenhagen has him #31 in the system.  Has him behind Denoyer and Rom, and far behind Lord. https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board?sortcol=1&sortdir=asc&org=bal

Why are you worried about where an evaluator put him after the draft? 

Let me say this, I have zero against Longenhagen or any other national evaluator, but if they put the kind of stuff Baumeister brings to the mound after a pitcher like Rom or Denoyer (who's stuff has taken a step back this year) then I'll just say they use a different evaluation criteria than me. The Orioles didn't give him $1.6 million because they think he might be a as good as Denoyer or Rom. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Why are you worried about where an evaluator put him after the draft? 

Let me say this, I have zero against Longenhagen or any other national evaluator, but if they put the kind of stuff Baumeister brings to the mound after a pitcher like Rom or Denoyer (who's stuff has taken a step back this year) then I'll just say they use a different evaluation criteria than me. The Orioles didn't give him $1.6 million because they think he might be a as good as Denoyer or Rom. 

Honestly, it concerns me because Longenhagen surely saw Baumeister and evaluated him for the draft. He knows about the stuff.  It’s less about the accuracy of his evaluation of Rom or Denoyer and more about that he clearly isn’t impressed by Baumeister especially given his position in relation to Lord who was drafted afterwards.  For a sophomore sign, I kinda expected a higher eval.   Of course, anyone can be wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Honestly, it concerns me because Longenhagen surely saw Baumeister and evaluated him for the draft. He knows about the stuff.  It’s less about the accuracy of his evaluation of Rom or Denoyer and more about that he clearly isn’t impressed by Baumeister especially given his position in relation to Lord who was drafted afterwards.  For a sophomore sign, I kinda expected a higher eval.   Of course, anyone can be wrong.  

Believe who want. Be concerned about what you want. I'll have him much higher.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baltfan said:

Honestly, it concerns me because Longenhagen surely saw Baumeister and evaluated him for the draft. He knows about the stuff.  It’s less about the accuracy of his evaluation of Rom or Denoyer and more about that he clearly isn’t impressed by Baumeister especially given his position in relation to Lord who was drafted afterwards.  For a sophomore sign, I kinda expected a higher eval.   Of course, anyone can be wrong.  

Longenhagen looks at a ton of players.  Tens of thousands?  National guys have their place, but it's a ton to piece together.  I'm sure he weighed the FSU stats like ERA a bit more than the individual skill sets that the O's looked at.  If nothing else there's a scale and efficiency thing to get the rankings done.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Longenhagen looks at a ton of players.  Tens of thousands?  National guys have their place, but it's a ton to piece together.  I'm sure he weighed the FSU stats like ERA a bit more than the individual skill sets that the O's looked at.  If nothing else there's a scale and efficiency thing to get the rankings done.

No matter what he did it was likely more for a guy like this than anyone on the board.  Now after he was drafted, I am sure many have looked at as much film as they can and dug into the stats.  It’s natural for us to want national guys to be high on the guys we pick, but definitely not dispositive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, baltfan said:

No matter what he did it was likely more for a guy like this than anyone on the board.  Now after he was drafted, I am sure many have looked at as much film as they can and dug into the stats.  It’s natural for us to want national guys to be high on the guys we pick, but definitely not dispositive. 

What were you hoping for?   There is a reason Baumeister got picked 63 and some had him rated lower.    At this point it all means nothing.   He throws 92-96 and just turned 21 and has good size.   I don’t care where he’s ranked now.   I care where he’s ranked at this time next here, hopefully after he’s made big strides.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A RH power bat to stick somewhere in the 3-4-5 slots. I would see what the Giants might want in a trade for Heliot Ramos. He hit .370 / .439 / .750 against LH pitchers this year, and would look awesome in the middle of all our lefty batters.  
    • Early in the offseason and my opinions may change, but here are my thoughts at this time. 1st - I'm ready to move on from Mountcastle.  And O'Hearn should only be a platoon option.  I hope we sign someone like a Alonso or Walker who doesn't have massive L/R splits and who can play on a daily basis, regardless of who is on the mound, and make both Ryans expendable, and we trade them for whatever we can get.  Otherwise we probably keep the platoon going, with the Ryan's splitting based on the SP.  Unfortunately Mayo hasn't show anything in the majors to make me think he's ready to be a regular in the lineup yet.  That could change in the spring, but right now we can't plan on him. 2nd - This is Holidays spot to start the season.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot.  Holiday didn't earn it by his play, but his pedigree and the money/time invested into him will give him a pretty long leash, for good or bad.  If he falters Westburg may be moved off of 3rd to play here instead. SS - Gunnar is here.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot. 3rd - Westburg.  He should hold this spot down unless Holiday struggles, and then he might be moved over the 2nd.  We don't bring in any real competition for this spot. Util - I don't like it, but I expect us to keep both Mateo and Urias, though I'm not 100% sure if we think Mateo will be ready for OD.  If Mateo isn't expected to be ready then I can see us bringing in someone for this role, though I'm not sure who off the top of my head. C - Adley has this spot, though if we are going to continue to keep his load light, we need a GOOD backup.  And after Adleys struggles the 2nd half of the season, I'm even more concerned about the quality of the backup than I was before this year started.  I'm just not sure how many GOOD backups exist, and any of the really good catchers are going to want to start more than they would here.  I'm not sure Basallo is ready for MLB time, and after the struggles with Mayo and Holiday, we surely can't count on him even if he is on the mlb roster.  McCann could come back...I don't love that idea, but I could see it happening. OF - We start with Mullins, Cowser and Kjerstad, don't try to resign Santander unless he take the QO.  I'd LOVE to see us bring in someone good here (Soto would rock, but clearly isn't going to happen) maybe Pederson or Hernandez or something.  Spend a bit of money here and get someone who has a decent bat. So upgrade 1st base with a non-platoon player and bring in a good vet in the OF.  Say goodbye to the Ryans and Santander. Pitching - I'd love to sign a #1 like Burnes or Snell, but I think they get more years and money than we are willing to go.  I can see us being in on a Max Fried or Jack Flahertyt.  Also possible to see some of the lesser guys, the Andrew Heaneys of the world. Bullpen - I expect to see a few journeyman/low level signings.  With the controllable players we traded for this year and what is returning I don't see us signing anyone big for the bullpen.  
    • I think it’s pretty natural for kids to take special notice of the guys with speed who make exciting plays like steals and triples and defensive “web gems.” Seems like the kids now are higher on guys like Mateo and Mullins than the grownups, and I think that was the case with Brian Roberts back in the day too. As for clutch, in going through some of the clutch numbers, one guy who stood out as a possible fit for us is Alex Bregman. He has a career 144 wRC+ with runners on base and a .294 BA with RISP — I tend to care a little more about BA when a hit scores a run. His postseason heroics are also pretty well-known. Not sure what you’d have to pay him, and I’m pretty sure signing him would necessitate the Holliday-to-CF move. But if they’re not willing to play in the Soto sandbox financially, Bregman would be a veteran guy with championship pedigree and (importantly) ties to Mike/Sig that could put him near the top of their list. 
    • Just to be as clear as possible, when they were doing better early in the season, they were swinging more, not less. 4/1 - 6/30: 7.2 BB%, 49.3% swing rate, 29.8% out of zone swing rate, 22.2% whiff rate, .316 OBP 7/1 - 9/30: 8.7 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.0% out of zone swing rate, 22.4% whiff rate, .315 OBP 2023: 8.4 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.9% out of zone swing rate, 23.0% whiff rate, .321 OBP They took less walks early in the year, they swung more often at both balls and strikes early in the year, and their OBP/whiff rates were essentially identical in both halves.  The notion that they turned into free-swinging hackers in the second half — and that’s why they failed — seems to be pretty commonly held here, but it’s not backed by any data. They were actually more patient at the plate in this season’s second half than they’ve ever been during the Adley era.
    • Meant to say I wouldn't mind him managing the Orioles. I always liked him as a manager. 
    • It is a foolish hope to expect a full season out of Rodriguez. Kremer is fine, and I’m glad to have him. Suarez was better in most meaningful stats, but we don’t know what Suarez is going to do. He could possibly be just a flash in the pan. Povich is trade or depth. We need depth. Our 2025 -ready pitchers all have potential problems. but now we also need outfielders and infielders
    • A very good move as long as he is healthy. Surprised he wanted to come back. I would had mind here. A HOF manager
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...