Jump to content

Orioles sign Ty Wigginton to a 2 year deal


jamesenoch

Recommended Posts

I've got to imagine that Scott is on his way out...They wouldn't have gotten Freel in the trade if they weren't going to keep him, and they still need someone to be the backup at shortstop which I thought was the main purpose of getting Gomez.

I think it's a good move. This will cover us for at least a year if we don't use Mora's option next year, but will definitely be a head scratcher if another move isn't made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From yesterday's Sun:

"I think you're always looking, particularly when you have 100 [free agents] still out there. You'd be foolish to say we're done," MacPhail said. "But with that being said, there is nothing on the horizon that I think is imminent."

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-sp.orioles03feb03,0,5912280.story

MacPhail apparently has a different definition of "imminent" than I do. :P

So now what? Is Scott about to be moved? Freel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Gomez plays the infield positions and Freel plays all the OF positions.
I agree, we still need someone who can back up SS which Freel cannot do. Maybe it won't be Gomez, we did sign a slew of backup IF, but we definitely need someone on the bench who can handle a couple starts at SS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would appear that way I suppose. If that is the plan though, can't say I'm thrilled with it.

If I remember correctly, Wigg hits pretty good at OPACY right? I have to look it up.

Why not? If Snyder fizzles out and is not ready by 2010, it's either Wiggington at 3B or bring Mora back. Heck, AM could still bring Mora back for another year anyway. That's flexibility, which is AM's plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, guess Adam Dunn's off the radar once and for all now. ;)

Seriously though, good move. That gives us even more flexibility to either make a trade, or have a bench that can play any position and provide offense.

Assuming Wigginton isn't costing an arm and a big toe, I'm pretty pleased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow this is great. January/February have been so much more exciting and interesting than December was. It's great to have real wheelings and dealings to analyze and evaluate. Much better than all of the silence and Tex drama of December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good move. Now they dont have to carry BOTH Freel and Gomez.

I tend to disagree, only because Gomez and still the only backup SS and Freel is the only backup OF in all 3 spots (Plus he is the only decent pinch runner on the bench). But, like I said I think this is the precursor to another move so, I'll reserve judgment until I see what else shakes out.

The one thing I think this move does indicate is a 4 man bench. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im very happy with this move. Gives us a guy who can actually play 1B and a replacement for Mora when he leaves.

I think Scott is going to get plenty of AB between LF and DH. Mora will get hurt at some point and Wigginton will go to 3B, Huff to 1B and Scott to DH.

Or Scott could be trade bait. Who know? Do the Cubs have something else we want? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...