Jump to content

The Orioles Bullpen, They can fix it


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Something far too often overlooked.  

It's a general criticism I have of Hyde as compared to Buck Showalter.  

Hyde is too match up obsessed. In close games it is defensible but like on Monday why are we doing match ups in the 9th inning when we have a 4 run lead? We see too often box scores of guys with 0.2 of an inning and it isn't always because they've been completely ineffective.

Can you image what it would be like this year if there wasn't the 3 batter minimum rule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs and MLB shows Orioles' relievers as only the 20th most used in terms of innings pitched -- 542 innings -- far fewer than Tampa at 618 innings (4th most).  So if the O's bullpen is struggling it's not because of the number of innings. 

So maybe recent bp struggles are more to do with the quality of the relievers we've picked up since the deadline like Fujinami and Lopez -- more so than the bp as a whole being overused.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Mendoza Line said:

Hyde is too match up obsessed. In close games it is defensible but like on Monday why are we doing match ups in the 9th inning when we have a 4 run lead? We see too often box scores of guys with 0.2 of an inning and it isn't always because they've been completely ineffective.

Can you image what it would be like this year if there wasn't the 3 batter minimum rule?

Or they pitch an inning but only throw 6 or 7 pitches and are lights out, and then Hyde brings in a different reliever the next inning who has been very shaky.  If you bring in enough relievers, you are going to find one who doesn't have it that day.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, EddeeEddee said:

Fangraphs and MLB shows Orioles' relievers as only the 20th most used in terms of innings pitched -- 542 innings -- far fewer than Tampa at 618 innings (4th most).  So if the O's bullpen is struggling it's not because of the number of innings. 

So maybe recent bp struggles are more to do with the quality of the relievers we've picked up since the deadline like Fujinami and Lopez -- more so than the bp as a whole being overused.  

We’re trading innings Bautista would have pitched for the likes of Lopez and Fuji. It’s only natural the bullpen would be struggling right now. 

And Cano gets forced into more of closer role instead of setting up for Bautista. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mendoza Line said:

Hyde is too match up obsessed. In close games it is defensible but like on Monday why are we doing match ups in the 9th inning when we have a 4 run lead? We see too often box scores of guys with 0.2 of an inning and it isn't always because they've been completely ineffective.

Can you image what it would be like this year if there wasn't the 3 batter minimum rule?

I have no problem with the matchup strategy. In the absence of Bautista we need to give our guys every advantage they can get. To make it work we should have moved Flaherty to the bullpen earlier, and/or made more bullpen moves to keep the bullpen fresh. 

Regarding the Houston game, there were guys on base against a very tough lineup. You absolutely don't want Cano facing a lefty there. I have no problem with nailing down the win today and worrying about tomorrow, tomorrow. But you should make a bullpen move to make sure you have fresh guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I have no problem with the matchup strategy. In the absence of Bautista we need to give our guys every advantage they can get. To make it work we should have moved Flaherty to the bullpen earlier, and/or made more bullpen moves to keep the bullpen fresh. 

Regarding the Houston game, there were guys on base against a very tough lineup. You absolutely don't want Cano facing a lefty there. I have no problem with nailing down the win today and worrying about tomorrow, tomorrow. But you should make a bullpen move to make sure you have fresh guys.

You can't trust your best healthy reliever with a 4 run lead, 2 outs and a single base runner in the 9th? Worst case scenario he gives up a HR and we still have a comfortable lead. Instead you need to use your second best reliever for the matchup?

My point is that Cano didn't need to be there in the first place. Used for the 3rd day in a row, unnecessarily. He would have been much more of a use in a game against that same ominous lineup protecting a 1 run or tie the next game, in which he would have been available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

      .   .   .

Regarding the Houston game, there were guys on base against a very tough lineup. You absolutely don't want Cano facing a lefty there. I have no problem with nailing down the win today and worrying about tomorrow, tomorrow. But you should make a bullpen move to make sure you have fresh guys.

Tomorrow has arrived, and there's plenty to worry about as far as the bullpen is concerned.   :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

We’re trading innings Bautista would have pitched for the likes of Lopez and Fuji. It’s only natural the bullpen would be struggling right now. 

And Cano gets forced into more of closer role instead of setting up for Bautista. 

For sure.  But it doesn't appear the bullpen is overworked generally speaking.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EddeeEddee said:

Fangraphs and MLB shows Orioles' relievers as only the 20th most used in terms of innings pitched -- 542 innings -- far fewer than Tampa at 618 innings (4th most).  So if the O's bullpen is struggling it's not because of the number of innings. 

So maybe recent bp struggles are more to do with the quality of the relievers we've picked up since the deadline like Fujinami and Lopez -- more so than the bp as a whole being overused.  

This might be deceptive. How many relief pitchers has Tampa used this year? How many relief pitchers have the O's used? I don't have the information nor the desire to dig at 1 a.m. but just because they pitched more innings, doesn't mean they've been used more if they've used more pitchers than we have.

Edit:

We've used 26 relievers, including guys like Givens, Garrett, Bazardo, McCann, McKenna and Josh Lester. 

Tampa has used 33 this season.

Edited by Malike
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pickles said:

Webb, Bauman, or Perez.

In a bullpen that has both the utterly unreliable Shintaro Fujinami and the very reliable (for giving up runs) Jorge Lopez, those are the guys you want to see gone? 

Maybe Baumann, but Perez has been excellent since late May and Webb has an ERA just north of 3 (with a FIP just south of it to match) since joining the club. 

Could just be me, but I’d much rather see the pothole come for one of the guys that are genuinely bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

Tomorrow has arrived, and there's plenty to worry about as far as the bullpen is concerned.   :confused:

I don't know what you're saying here. I am definitely concerned about bullpen strength and depth. I'm also glad we won the game that we did. When we don't have enough guys available we should make roster moves and bring up a fresh arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...