Jump to content

Position Player Depth Chart for 2024 (Updated post Burnes trade)


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

On 1/13/2024 at 4:21 PM, Greg Pappas said:

Based on @Tony-OH's Top Prospect List reports, as well as our current Major League roster, I've laid out our possible positional depth chart for the coming season.  

After reading through the prospect reports, certain guys don't seem as a fit for defensive positions that I'd come to believe, so the depth chart should be revamped with that in mind.  Examples of this are Kjerstad below average in RF and more of a 1B/DH, Holliday better suited at 2B than SS, Norby below average at 2B and looking like a LF/DH, and Mayo still an option at 3B but perhaps better served in RF than 1B (though I did keep him in the 1B depth chart in case). 

Key: *=Lefty bat, #=Switch-hitter, and ages as of opening day are in parentheses
 

1B: Mountcastle (27.1), *O'Hearn (30.7), #Santander (29.4), *Kjerstad (25.1), Mayo (22.3) AAA

2B: Westburg (25.1), Ortiz (25.7), Urias (29.8), *Holliday (20.3) AAA

SS: *Henderson (22.7), Ortiz (25.7), Mateo (28.8), Westburg (25.1) 

3B: *Henderson (22.7), Westburg (25.1), Urias (29.8), Mayo (22.3) AAA

CA: #Rutschman (26.1), McCann (33.8), *Michael Perez (31.7) AAA, David Bañuelos (27.5) AAA, Maverick Handley (26.0) AAA

LF: Hays (28.7), *Cowser (24.0), *Hilliard (30.1), McKenna (27.1), *Stowers (26.2) AAA, Norby (23.8) AAA

CF: *Mullins (29.5), *Cowser (24.0), McKenna (27.1), Mateo (28.8), *Hilliard (30.1)

RF: #Santander (29.4), *O'Hearn (30.7), *Cowser (24.0), *Kjerstad (25.1), *Stowers (26.2) AAA, Mayo (22.3) AAA

DH: *Kjerstad (25.1), #Santander (29.4), #Rutschman (26.1), Mountcastle (27.1), *O'Hearn (30.7), *Hilliard (30.1), Norby (23.8) AAA


Notes:

  • I recognize that I have Gunnar starting at SS and 3B, but that's because I can't put Ortiz above him at SS until the O's show that as a strong possibility this Spring. 
  • Anyone can DH, but those are the guys that have done it and/or may be destined for AB's there in the future.
  • Players like Samuel Basallo are not listed because I don't believe we'll see them in 2024.

 

I tried to be thorough, but may have missed something or someone. Anyway, what are your thoughts?

Few comments:

Holliday is a SS and should be included in the SS depth. Probably ahead of Urias.   With the SS depth I doubt we see Westburg playing much SS.

Ortiz can play 3B.  

Kjerstad can play LF if the O's are away.

O'Hearn range in right is poor.  I think Cowser is ahead of him and maybe  even Kjerstad.

2023 DH OPS:  O'Hearn 937, Mountcastle 900, Adley 874, Kjerstad 776, Santander 690 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Few comments:

Holliday is a SS and should be included in the SS depth. Probably ahead of Urias.   With the SS depth I doubt we see Westburg playing much SS.

Ortiz can play 3B.  

Kjerstad can play LF if the O's are away.

O'Hearn range in right is poor.  I think Cowser is ahead of him and maybe  even Kjerstad.

2023 DH OPS:  O'Hearn 937, Mountcastle 900, Adley 874, Kjerstad 776, Santander 690 

 

It's fair to say Holliday should be added to the SS group, though Urias is not listed at short. Agreed that Westburg will rarely see SS, but I listed him as he has and can play there in a pinch.  Ortiz can play 3B, so I'll add him there also.  Kjerstad on the road in LF is possible as well.  Thanks for posting this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Deep depth. Much respect for being realistic. 

I think Hilliard should be higher, but we’ll see what happens. It’s not a big deal anyways. 

Aaron Hicks could be in the mix. Bring back the OH’s lovable vet. 

Thanks.  Hilliard was, IMHO, a depth signing, and one I'd be surprised to find on our roster Opening Day.  He's about to turn 30, and has had 717 PA's over a 5-year career.  His outfield defense is hard to judge for me, but seems modest, as has been his hitting, as he's sported a career 84 OPS+.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

1st glance, I think Urias is above Ortiz at 2nd base on the depth chart as things stand currently.

Even if that were true and I am not sure it is, Urias will make 2.1M and Ortiz makes 740K to do the same job.    I am not sure at all the Urias makes it to opening day unless Ortiz is included into a trade for a pitcher.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Even if that were true and I am not sure it is, Urias will make 2.1M and Ortiz makes 740K to do the same job.    I am not sure at all the Urias makes it to opening day unless Ortiz is included into a trade for a pitcher.

You and I don't make the depth chart. Brandon Hyde does. And last year Hyde had Urias playing a significant amount of 2nd base for a team that already had a 2nd basemen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2024 at 4:21 PM, Greg Pappas said:

Based on @Tony-OH's Top Prospect List reports, as well as our current Major League roster, I've laid out our possible positional depth chart for the coming season.  

After reading through the prospect reports, certain guys don't seem as a fit for defensive positions that I'd come to believe, so the depth chart should be revamped with that in mind.  Examples of this are Kjerstad below average in RF and more of a 1B/DH, Holliday better suited at 2B than SS, Norby below average at 2B and looking like a LF/DH, and Mayo still an option at 3B but perhaps better served in RF than 1B (though I did keep him in the 1B depth chart in case). 

Key: *=Lefty bat, #=Switch-hitter, and ages as of opening day are in parentheses
 

1B: Mountcastle (27.1), *O'Hearn (30.7), #Santander (29.4), *Kjerstad (25.1), Mayo (22.3) AAA

2B: Westburg (25.1), Ortiz (25.7), Urias (29.8), *Holliday (20.3) AAA

SS: *Henderson (22.7), Ortiz (25.7), Mateo (28.8), Westburg (25.1), *Holliday (20.3) AAA 

3B: *Henderson (22.7), Westburg (25.1), Urias (29.8), Ortiz (25.7), Mayo (22.3) AAA

CA: #Rutschman (26.1), McCann (33.8), *Michael Perez (31.7) AAA, David Bañuelos (27.5) AAA, Maverick Handley (26.0) AAA

LF: Hays (28.7), *Cowser (24.0), *Kjerstad (25.1), *Hilliard (30.1), McKenna (27.1), *Stowers (26.2) AAA, Norby (23.8) AAA

CF: *Mullins (29.5), *Cowser (24.0), McKenna (27.1), Mateo (28.8), *Hilliard (30.1)

RF: #Santander (29.4), *O'Hearn (30.7), *Cowser (24.0), *Kjerstad (25.1), *Stowers (26.2) AAA, Mayo (22.3) AAA

DH: *Kjerstad (25.1), #Santander (29.4), #Rutschman (26.1), Mountcastle (27.1), *O'Hearn (30.7), *Hilliard (30.1), Norby (23.8) AAA


Notes:

  • I recognize that I have Gunnar starting at SS and 3B, but that's because I can't put Ortiz above him at SS until the O's show that as a strong possibility this Spring. 
  • Anyone can DH, but those are the guys that have done it and/or may be destined for AB's there in the future.
  • Players like Samuel Basallo are not listed because I don't believe we'll see them in 2024.

 

I tried to be thorough, but may have missed something or someone. Anyway, what are your thoughts?

Thanks GP! My only observation would be that Ortiz is too high on the depth chart 2B/SS. He seems to be the odd man out with Mateo and Urias still on the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2024 at 4:21 PM, Greg Pappas said:

Based on @Tony-OH's Top Prospect List reports, as well as our current Major League roster, I've laid out our possible positional depth chart for the coming season.  

After reading through the prospect reports, certain guys don't seem as a fit for defensive positions that I'd come to believe, so the depth chart should be revamped with that in mind.  Examples of this are Kjerstad below average in RF and more of a 1B/DH, Holliday better suited at 2B than SS, Norby below average at 2B and looking like a LF/DH, and Mayo still an option at 3B but perhaps better served in RF than 1B (though I did keep him in the 1B depth chart in case). 

Key: *=Lefty bat, #=Switch-hitter, and ages as of opening day are in parentheses
 

1B: Mountcastle (27.1), *O'Hearn (30.7), #Santander (29.4), *Kjerstad (25.1), Mayo (22.3) AAA

2B: Westburg (25.1), Ortiz (25.7), Urias (29.8), *Holliday (20.3) AAA

SS: *Henderson (22.7), Ortiz (25.7), Mateo (28.8), Westburg (25.1), *Holliday (20.3) AAA 

3B: *Henderson (22.7), Westburg (25.1), Urias (29.8), Ortiz (25.7), Mayo (22.3) AAA

CA: #Rutschman (26.1), McCann (33.8), *Michael Perez (31.7) AAA, David Bañuelos (27.5) AAA, Maverick Handley (26.0) AAA

LF: Hays (28.7), *Cowser (24.0), *Kjerstad (25.1), *Hilliard (30.1), McKenna (27.1), *Stowers (26.2) AAA, Norby (23.8) AAA

CF: *Mullins (29.5), *Cowser (24.0), McKenna (27.1), Mateo (28.8), *Hilliard (30.1)

RF: #Santander (29.4), *O'Hearn (30.7), *Cowser (24.0), *Kjerstad (25.1), *Stowers (26.2) AAA, Mayo (22.3) AAA

DH: *Kjerstad (25.1), #Santander (29.4), #Rutschman (26.1), Mountcastle (27.1), *O'Hearn (30.7), *Hilliard (30.1), Norby (23.8) AAA


Notes:

  • I recognize that I have Gunnar starting at SS and 3B, but that's because I can't put Ortiz above him at SS until the O's show that as a strong possibility this Spring. 
  • Anyone can DH, but those are the guys that have done it and/or may be destined for AB's there in the future.
  • Players like Samuel Basallo are not listed because I don't believe we'll see them in 2024.

 

I tried to be thorough, but may have missed something or someone. Anyway, what are your thoughts?

Nice Greg …. A couple of thoughts.

Weve discussed Ortiz at SS so I’m not sure why you can’t put him at SS over Gunner. I think those 2 are our best defensive set of any listed. 
 

Im sure it’s splitting hairs but O’Hearn was used a number of times in RF last season. I expect Hyde to do so again if his bat continues to play like it did in 2023. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Nice Greg …. A couple of thoughts.

Weve discussed Ortiz at SS so I’m not sure why you can’t put him at SS over Gunner. I think those 2 are our best defensive set of any listed. 
 

Im sure it’s splitting hairs but O’Hearn was used a number of times in RF last season. I expect Hyde to do so again if his bat continues to play like it did in 2023. 

Thank you. I believe Ortiz at SS makes sense, but our RoY played very well there and I could not put Ortiz over him until I see what Hyde does this Spring.
O'Hearn is listed 2nd in RF, behind Santander.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Thanks GP! My only observation would be that Ortiz is too high on the depth chart 2B/SS. He seems to be the odd man out with Mateo and Urias still on the roster. 

Thank you.  The Depth Chart is parts history and speculation, so how it shakes out will reveal itself this Spring.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

You and I don't make the depth chart. Brandon Hyde does. And last year Hyde had Urias playing a significant amount of 2nd base for a team that already had a 2nd basemen.

Urias had 15 starts at 2B.  That is not a lot of a veteran player.  Not the basis for the future IMO.  I am not questioning Urias glove at 2B.  I question his bat.  703 OPS with not good.   I question that he has no options.   And I question his salary when compared to Ortiz.  He will play next year at 30 years old.

Ortiz entered the 2023 season needing to prove more with the bat at AAA.   He did that during his season at AAA.  He has a 904 OPS at AAA.   Tony calls him the  best SS glove in the O's system.  He can play all three infield skill positions including 2B.  And he is cheap with options.  Ortiz is on the rise while Urias slipped back last year.  Ortiz will play next year at 25.  I am also impressed that the guys over at On the Verge keep talking about how hard Ortiz hits the ball.

When you add that Holliday and Westburg are both on the team sometime next year  I don't know if Urias makes team.  He is fighting with Mateo for a utility spot and Mateo has top on the league speed as a weapon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...