Jump to content

Thus far this season: Things I was wrong about and right about


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Otter said:

I was wrong about regression from O'Hearn, but I was right about Elias not acquiring enough pitching depth in the offseason.

For once I would like someone to explain this. We've lost 3 starters to TJS, something that should never be expected at the beginning of the season, and yet we still have 6 viable starters for the rotation (5 if you don't include Kremer who will be back soon). He still has a month+ to get another one via trade if he desires. In what way did he not acquire enough pitching depth? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dystopia said:

For once I would like someone to explain this. We've lost 3 starters to TJS, something that should never be expected at the beginning of the season, and yet we still have 6 viable starters for the rotation (5 if you don't include Kremer who will be back soon). He still has a month+ to get another one via trade if he desires. In what way did he not acquire enough pitching depth? 

Because pitching injuries are inevitable.  We were very lucky with a lack of pitching injuries last year, and even though no one could have predicted 3 TJs it still shouldn't be so shocking that a GM shouldn't have protected himself against the probability.  I'm not saying we should have acquired more high level starters, but Elias probably should have acquired one more high leverage reliever and one or two depth starters to stash at AAA.  And because Elias ignored pitching until last year's draft, we don't have a pitching pipeline in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Otter said:

Because pitching injuries are inevitable.  We were very lucky with a lack of pitching injuries last year, and even though no one could have predicted 3 TJs it still shouldn't be so shocking that a GM shouldn't have protected himself against the probability.  I'm not saying we should have acquired more high level starters, but Elias probably should have acquired one more high leverage reliever and one or two depth starters to stash at AAA.  And because Elias ignored pitching until last year's draft, we don't have a pitching pipeline in the minors.

Right, but my point is - we still have 6 viable starters right now even with the injuries. So I object to the statement that he didn't get enough pitching depth (to be fair you're not the only one who has said this). He did, and that's why we're still fine despite losing 3 SP for the year.

If he didn't acquire enough we'd be trotting Julio Teheran out there every 5th day. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, dystopia said:

For once I would like someone to explain this. We've lost 3 starters to TJS, something that should never be expected at the beginning of the season, and yet we still have 6 viable starters for the rotation (5 if you don't include Kremer who will be back soon). He still has a month+ to get another one via trade if he desires. In what way did he not acquire enough pitching depth? 

Not sure how viable Suarez really is over a full season and you knew Bradish and likely Means were ticking time bombs. 
 

That said, what were you going to acquire? I said I would have still liked to have seen us add a guy like Edward Cabrera. Some kind of younger arm under control for a long time but we also don’t know for sure that arm was available.

That said, the bullpen was an obvious issue and not enough was done there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you're saying, but I'm reluctant to say we have 6 viable starters right now since it's much too early to say that for Povich (especially with how horrible his control/command have been) and we still have injury concerns with Kremer.  Furthermore, we're still in the SSS range for Suarez and too early to call him a viable starter for a WS contending team.

And what depth for the bullpen did Elias acquire in the offseason?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree about the bullpen, although a lot of the guys folks on here wanted are either performing badly or out with injury. 

I don't think anyone expected Means to need another TJ. There was a poll done for innings expectations for him and most people picked the 100-120 inning range IIRC. 

I don't expect Suarez to start a WS game, but I also expect Elias to go get another starter at the deadline. How good of a starter is hard to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, dystopia said:

For once I would like someone to explain this. We've lost 3 starters to TJS, something that should never be expected at the beginning of the season, and yet we still have 6 viable starters for the rotation (5 if you don't include Kremer who will be back soon). He still has a month+ to get another one via trade if he desires. In what way did he not acquire enough pitching depth? 

These days, TJ is more to be expected than not, especially with guys throwing 98+, or throwing complicated twisting pitches. So, TJ SHOULD have been expected, especially with the pre-season injury concerns: Means had it before, Wells had it before, Bradish had unexplained arm problems and then a PRP procedure. All of them should have been predicted for long IL stays, and that’s what happened.

Right now, I’m even leery of Kremer being a meaningful contributor the rest of the season, but I hope he will. I’m even worried about Suarez, because you know, the Baseball Gods will have their little surprises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think right now Chayce McDermott personifies more quality reserve depth than most MLB teams have, and we have about another month stepping through a deployment pattern targeted at maximizing options available July 30.      Elias would be folding a bluff he is a genuine SP prospect if he put him in the bullpen now.

The Holliday 50% K rate detail was cool - it is Matt Wallner this year, another touted bat who Minnesota had to reset.     Last year it was Bobby Dalbec and Brett Phillips, and about 30 PA seems to be about as much as a MLB club will tolerate of that.

I was wrong thinking in the first month or two of the Rubenstein honeymoon that someone would get done.

I was right thinking between Cowser and Kjerstad one would get heavily emphasized over the other for another aimed shot at RoY incentives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, dystopia said:

I do agree about the bullpen, although a lot of the guys folks on here wanted are either performing badly or out with injury. 

I don't think anyone expected Means to need another TJ. There was a poll done for innings expectations for him and most people picked the 100-120 inning range IIRC. 

I don't expect Suarez to start a WS game, but I also expect Elias to go get another starter at the deadline. How good of a starter is hard to say. 

Even if Means threw 100-120 innings, that’s still a lot of innings that need to be covered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Philip said:

These days, TJ is more to be expected than not, especially with guys throwing 98+, or throwing complicated twisting pitches. So, TJ SHOULD have been expected, especially with the pre-season injury concerns: Means had it before, Wells had it before, Bradish had unexplained arm problems and then a PRP procedure. All of them should have been predicted for long IL stays, and that’s what happened.

Right now, I’m even leery of Kremer being a meaningful contributor the rest of the season, but I hope he will. I’m even worried about Suarez, because you know, the Baseball Gods will have their little surprises.

TJ should have been expected for Bradish. Not Means or Wells. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong: I would have trouble rooting for Kimbrel after years of finding him annoying. 
 

Right (IMO): Mountcastle had more to show. He’s been much better at 1st (though still has problems with pop ups), and has a decent shot at a career year at the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much like the Fonz (leather jacket wearing dude from 70’s TV for the young folks) I’m never wrong, but I have been surprised a couple times.

I’m surprised our elder outfielders seem to be bouncing back from very slow starts.

I shouldn’t have been surprised by Means going back to surgery, but I was.

The bullpen has also performed better than I anticipated — although the injuries there may yet derail our relief corps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Orioles West said:

Much like the Fonz (The jumping the shark guy for the young folks) I’m never wrong, but I have been surprised a couple times.

I’m surprised our elder outfielders seem to be bouncing back from very slow starts.

I shouldn’t have been surprised by Means going back to surgery, but I was.

The bullpen has also performed better than I anticipated — although the injuries there may yet derail our relief corps.

FTFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...