Jump to content

Organizational Turmoil?


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Kinda to be expected.   If we don’t win this year, next year might have to be a transition year with the young guys.  I would trade Mounty and let Santander walk.  Let the young guys play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only interesting part, to me, is the bit about long term extensions. 

The other parts were going to pretty obviously going to be a problem.

Guys should have been shipped off during the offseason, but Elias is too risk adverse to promote that many young players at once.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The only interesting part, to me, is the bit about long term extensions. 

The other parts were going to pretty obviously going to be a problem.

Guys should have been shipped off during the offseason, but Elias is too risk adverse to promote that many young players at once.

The extensions line seemed like a throw away.  I haven’t seen any young players talking about wanting them.   Maybe Mounty is interested or Ced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, baltfan said:

The extensions line seemed like a throw away.  I haven’t seen any young players talking about wanting them.   Maybe Mounty is interested or Ced. 

They aren't going to talk about it.

I can't imagine Adley, for instance, going to the media to lobby for an extension.  It's very unprofessional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

They aren't going to talk about it.

I can't imagine Adley, for instance, going to the media to lobby for an extension.  It's very unprofessional.

Sure they would. They can say they would love to talk extension or how they want to finish their career here. You never hear any of the young guys say anything like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got through the payroll to read the story. There are no quotes or sources. The following paragraph states "the locker room has not fractured or turned sour--not at all..." Just a bunch of vague speculation. 

So the question is what did Hays say when he "confirmed" the story? Just that the veterans are pressing?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, baltfan said:

Sure they would. They can say they would love to talk extension or how they want to finish their career here. You never hear any of the young guys say anything like that. 

 

Oh, so you mean we don't get pointless platitudes?

Cool, I'd rather not hear canned response #3.

I thought you meant actual dialog on the topic.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Oh, so you mean we don't get pointless platitudes?

Cool, I'd rather not hear canned response #3.

I thought you meant actual dialog on the topic.

 

I am not talking about when asked directly.  Guys have ways that they can signal that they want an extension. It also isn’t unprofessional to come out and say after Witt signs, for example, that you would love to extend too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I just got through the payroll to read the story. There are no quotes or sources. The following paragraph states "the locker room has not fractured or turned sour--not at all..." Just a bunch of vague speculation. 

So the question is what did Hays say when he "confirmed" the story? Just that the veterans are pressing?

Sounds like Hays confirmed that he was the problem, lol

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Things are a real mess despite being in first place. 

Maybe not related but did anyone hear Keith Law with Haynie yesterday, right after the news broke that Hays had been traded? Law made a comment that I thought centered around the negative thoughts from Hays teammates towards him. (I was surprised and I know, it’s Law). Did anyone else hear that and maybe correct my version in case I heard it wrong?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, baltfan said:

I am not talking about when asked directly.  Guys have ways that they can signal that they want an extension. It also isn’t unprofessional to come out and say after Witt signs, for example, that you would love to extend too. 

I think it is.

On both sides, in regards to the team and to your agent that you pay to handle that sort of thing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...