Jump to content

All in on our future


Big Al

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

The concern is that this offense may be structurally unsound for facing elite pitching in the playoffs. These young guys seem to have been taught a certain way of playing offense, and you don't know if they can still unlearn that or if that's who they are. All batters are to some extent mistake hitters, but these guys seem to be exclusively mistake hitters.

Facing elite pitching or guys with 5 plus era ? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Pickles said:

You know, you're hardly alone in this, but this is such a stupid, lazy take it deserved to be called out.

 

Its the biggest bs narrative amongst O's fans.  Not only is it not factually correct, it ignores all the positive stats saying their approach is very good.

They don't need to change anything outside of walking more.

Otherwise, they just need to change a few hitters with better hitters.  

This whole over the top, factually wrong complaint should be directed at a few players (ie, roster spots) vs an actual organizational approach to offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Let's be clear, if an elite pitcher isn't making mistakes it's extremely hard for anyone to do much of anything against them.

But good teams find a way to push across a run or two against good pitching. You are automatically against any opinions and never in agreement. What a strange way to go through life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

 This whole over the top, factually wrong complaint should be directed at a few players (ie, roster spots) vs an actual organizational approach to offense.

Is that why Elias let the hitting coaches go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Is that why Elias let the hitting coaches go?

Just because you let go of coaches, doesn’t mean you are going to change hitting philosophies. Maybe they had issues with the players or some of their messaging wasn’t getting through.

There are a myriad of reasons why coaches leave.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Just because you let go of coaches, doesn’t mean you are going to change hitting philosophies. Maybe they had issues with the players or some of their messaging wasn’t getting through.

There are a myriad of reasons why coaches leave.

To me it sounds like you are struggling to stay away from a logical conclusion.   Elias stated in his postseason interview that he was concerned about the team's inability to score with runners in scoring position.   Then pitching coaches are let go.   I would think the two things are connected.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wildcard said:

To me it sounds like you are struggling to stay away from a logical conclusion.   Elias stated in his postseason interview that he was concerned about the team's inability to score with runners in scoring position.   Then pitching coaches are let go.   I would think the two things are connected.  

Tweaking may happen but they aren’t changing philosophies.  I understand that you struggle to understand simple logic and you want to push one of your bs narratives but the Orioles were one of the best offenses in the game in 2024. You don’t change philosophies when that’s the case. 
 

What you do is tweak things…they need more walks and they need to do a better job scoring runs from third with less than 2 outs.

They aren’t going to go from the philosophy they have to what Detroit was this year. That would be incredibly stupid.

Move on from Santander and Mounty will be good starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

To me it sounds like you are struggling to stay away from a logical conclusion.   Elias stated in his postseason interview that he was concerned about the team's inability to score with runners in scoring position.   Then pitching coaches are let go.   I would think the two things are connected.  

What did he say?  Give me his exact words.  I bet they don't support what you said the did.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Its the biggest bs narrative amongst O's fans.  Not only is it not factually correct, it ignores all the positive stats saying their approach is very good.

They don't need to change anything outside of walking more.

Otherwise, they just need to change a few hitters with better hitters.  

This whole over the top, factually wrong complaint should be directed at a few players (ie, roster spots) vs an actual organizational approach to offense.

Even the walking isn't the issue some seem to think.  While the team finished 8th overall in BB, they were dead last in the 1st half.  Ironically, they walked more as the season progressed and the results weren't as favorable.

The team had 9 guys receive 300 abs this year; the lowest OPS+ among them was 107.   The offense wasn't the problem

Further, the league average OBP was .312.  The only people below that were Mullins, Mountcastle and Santander.  Westburg was .312 on the nose.

To me, the only guy with a "bad" approach is Mountcastle.  He's extremely frustrating.

But there's nothing in the results, or approach, that calls for widespread changes or even the kind of criticism that has been levied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Even the walking isn't the issue some seem to think.  While the team finished 8th overall in BB, they were dead last in the 1st half.  Ironically, they walked more as the season progressed and the results weren't as favorable.

The team had 9 guys receive 300 abs this year; the lowest OPS+ among them was 107.   The offense wasn't the problem

Further, the league average OBP was .312.  The only people below that were Mullins, Mountcastle and Santander.  Westburg was .312 on the nose.

To me, the only guy with a "bad" approach is Mountcastle.  He's extremely frustrating.

But there's nothing in the results, or approach, that calls for widespread changes or even the kind of criticism that has been levied.

They were 19th in BB%.  It was down by .5% from last year.

Of course, the league average OBP was also down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They were 19th in BB%.  It was down by .5% from last year.

Of course, the league average OBP was also down.

They were better this year at getting on base.  Relatively.

Last year they were 7th in the league in OBP, and the team had a .321 OBP in an environment with an average of .320.

This year they were 4th, and .315 in an environment of .312 average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...