Jump to content

July 3: Baltimore at Anaheim


Mark Carver

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You mean like the 10 they put up in the 7th and 8th to cap the greatest comeback in franchise history?

Good lord some people have short memories.

That's one game. It was a great game, and I enjoyed it thoroughly.

But how often have we seen something like this? Big lead early, opponent works their way back in late, like maybe THE DAY AFTER THAT COMEBACK YOU SPOKE OF!!!

Is that too much to ask to get a hit with runners in scoring position like we've had like 3 times in this game in the later innings???

This one worked out, and I'm thankful, but great teams add on runs late. Your insinuation that the comeback against the Sux on Tuesday makes my response reactionary is completely undercut by what happened on Wednesday with the Red Sux.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's one game. It was a great game, and I enjoyed it thoroughly.

But how often have we seen something like this? Big lead early, opponent works their way back in late, like maybe THE DAY AFTER THAT COMEBACK YOU SPOKE OF!!!

Is that too much to ask to get a hit with runners in scoring position like we've had like 3 times in this game in the later innings???

This one worked out, and I'm thankful, but great teams add on runs late. Your insinuation that the comeback against the Sux on Tuesday makes my response reactionary is completely undercut by what happened on Wednesday with the Red Sux.

Your undercutting is taken out at the knees by the fact the Orioles have won something like 90% of games that they lead after the 7th inning this year. I can't remember this exact statistic but Trembley was defending his call in the aforementioned Red Sox fiasco by stating that the team was (not exact stats) something like 27 - 4 in such situations.

Not too many teams can claim better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your undercutting is taken out at the knees by the fact the Orioles have won something like 90% of games that they lead after the 7th inning this year. I can't remember this exact statistic but Trembley was defending his call in the aforementioned Red Sox fiasco by stating that the team was (not exact stats) something like 27 - 4 in such situations.

Not too many teams can claim better than that.

I'm confused. So you're saying the O's COULD NOT have avoided what happened wednesday by oh, I don't know, adding on a few runs in the middle innings???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Jim Johnson was going to blow it :drek::drek::drek:

Then, I knew my bro was coming in, and he might blow it :drek::drek::drek:

What a relief!!! :bangwall:

:mwahaha:

Your bro (and JJ too) have the Kwan. More than you or I or anyone else here. They have made themselves into ML stoppers. One bad night does not nullify that.

The game/defense got into the late innings and I relaxed. In the bag. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You bet, Scott. I get mad when folks run down GS and give elsid a bunch of stuff. I've been trying to tell those folks who want to deal GS for Lord knows what, we're going to need GS when we're a contending ballclub. Excellent closers (and Flat Breezies) don't grow on trees.

Thanks for participating here, elsid. I--and many others--am glad you participate.

P.S., is GS OK? I was a bit worried when he paused on the mound and seemed to attend to his eyes. :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for participating here, elsid. I--and many others--am glad you participate.

P.S., is GS OK? I was a bit worried when he paused on the mound and seemed to attend to his eyes. :eek:

No problem. I don't mind anyone giving flak, if it is due. Some just want to complain about every given thing. Now that JJ has had a couple of small, slight issues (not really even worth fully noting), does everyone have a crazy attitude? No, it is just a bump in the road. If only GS could have that much luck (not pitching luck -- don't want to be lambasted) and love.

Only a speck of dirt in his eye. He doesn't wear contacts or anything like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem. I don't mind anyone giving flak, if it is due. Some just want to complain about every given thing. Now that JJ has had a couple of small, slight issues (not really even worth fully noting), does everyone have a crazy attitude? No, it is just a bump in the road. If only GS could have that much luck (not pitching luck -- don't want to be lambasted) and love.

Only a speck of dirt in his eye. He doesn't wear contacts or anything like that.

Good to hear about his eyes, elsid. Glad it wasn't serious.

Agreed about GS, too. I think he's vastly underrated around here and is extremely valuable to the Orioles. They'd be foolish to do anything other than to keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • So cross off the name of a guy we had no chance of going after in the first place? Got it.
    • I know a lot of chatter on here, in terms of adding a TOR guy, has centered around Burnes.    This makes it more difficult, especially in terms of a trade and then extend him scenario.
    • If things go as planned, for the next 5 years, you have a boatload of talent around him making collectively very little money.  Maybe you look to trade him down the line?  Maybe you keep producing cheap talent and can always surround his contract with 10-15 guys making the league minimum. Quite frankly, that should be the plan anyway.
    • Can he play quarterback too? 😃 My answer is NO. He's a special player but it will be too much money tied up with one player for too long. Rather develop our own and then have the resources and will to extend them.
    • A quick look at Sportrac shows that Sherzer and Verlander at 12.9% of payroll, Judge at 14.9% and Cole at 13.44%, Bogaerts is a relative bargain at 10.74%.  12.5% of $400 million is $50 million and that is how I arrived at the suggested team payroll figure based on $50 million AAV.  Your 20% would require the payroll to be $250 million and currently only two teams reach that threshold - the Yankees and Mets.
    • As magnificent as Ohtani is, he hasn't been the best player on his team, much less the best player of all time. During Ohtani's time with the Angels (2018-2022), Ohtani has been less valuable than one of his teammates, a teammate who missed all but 39 games of the 2021 season (27.7 WAR for Trout in 2018-2022 versus 24.8 for Ohtani). Ohtani has had two great years as a two way player, one other excellent year as a hitter, and two pitching seasons lost to injury. He's a wonderful player, but he's only been a top WAR player for the past two years. He may be the most amazing player currently playing, but I think I think calling him the greatest player of all time is way, way over the top (even if you qualify it by "in this moment"...he came in second in WAR last year, had a poor season in 2020 (OPS+ of 79), didn't pitch in 2019, etc.). 
    • I wasn’t saying that he would magically make the team World Series winners 4 out of 6, I was saying what if that signing was the extra guy that made it happen. To be clear, I think the Os could go to the WS sometime soon(this year to the next 4) without him. There is a very solid core coming up and if they make the playoffs, they have as good a chance as anyone. It is basically a statistical crap shoot once the playoffs start.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...