Jump to content

This is Progress


helloharv

Recommended Posts

We're supposed to measure that we're headed in the right direction, but the question is how?

By the standings? Nope, don't look there. We shouldn't expect any incremental improvement there on the way to the promised land. Not only did everyone assume this would be a rough season, but they also assumed we'd be six games behind the pace at this point last year. When it comes together, it will all be in one year, like it was for the Rays. All the cosmic tumblers will then fall into place.

By the statistics? uh-uh, wrong-o. For example, our starting pitching is ranked where it was at the end of last season; last in baseball.

By our expectations for things on the horizon? This is where the pro-MacPhail camp make their most fervent arguments, on things where the crystal ball gets used most heavily. Let's hope the "big three" live up to their press reports. Let's hope we find a long-term solution at both first and third base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No, but you point is that our team should have beaten a pitcher like Chen, and my point (while I agree with you) is that the Royals should be able to beat Rich Hill too. Both teams cant win so.....

Rich Hill pitched 2.1 innings and left with the O's chasing by one... Chen pitched 5.0 innings..both gave up the same amount of runs in 3...

It was 3-2 KC when Hill left... so Hill really didn't kill the game for the O's. Their bats did...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, since you decided to use Evan Longoria as the model for how all young players should start their careers, why not use the Rays as the model for going from doormat to contender...now?

What does that have to do with being patient and showing progression towards 2010 when the O's are supposed to be competitive..

Don't start another argument when we haven't finished this one..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're supposed to measure that we're headed in the right direction, but the question is how?

By the standings? Nope, don't look there. We shouldn't expect any incremental improvement there on the way to the promised land. Not only did everyone assume this would be a rough season, but they also assumed we'd be six games behind the pace at this point last year. When it comes together, it will all be in one year, like it was for the Rays. All the cosmic tumblers will then fall into place.

By the statistics? uh-uh, wrong-o. For example, our starting pitching is ranked where it was at the end of last season; last in baseball.

By our expectations for things on the horizon? This is where the pro-MacPhail camp make their most fervent arguments, on things where the crystal ball gets used most heavily. Let's hope the "big three" live up to their press reports. Let's hope we find a long-term solution at both first and third base.

What's wrong with any of that?

The whole purpose of what the front office is trying to do with the team is build the core from the minors. Well, part of that core is not here yet, and the part that is here is going though the normal growing pains of young players.

Do you believe that the plan we are following is incorrect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does that have to do with being patient and showing progression towards 2010 when the O's are supposed to be competitive..

Don't start another argument when we haven't finished this one..

It's all part of your unrealistic expectations that derive from your lack of patience established lo all those many posts ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all part of your unrealistic expectations that derive from your lack of patience established lo all those many posts ago.

How are my expectations unrealistic when MacPhail said the O's will be competitive in 2010? How about MacPhail might be a little unrealistic.. not the fans that see through the BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're supposed to measure that we're headed in the right direction, but the question is how?

By the standings? Nope, don't look there. We shouldn't expect any incremental improvement there on the way to the promised land. Not only did everyone assume this would be a rough season, but they also assumed we'd be six games behind the pace at this point last year. When it comes together, it will all be in one year, like it was for the Rays. All the cosmic tumblers will then fall into place.

By the statistics? uh-uh, wrong-o. For example, our starting pitching is ranked where it was at the end of last season; last in baseball.

By our expectations for things on the horizon? This is where the pro-MacPhail camp make their most fervent arguments, on things where the crystal ball gets used most heavily. Let's hope the "big three" live up to their press reports. Let's hope we find a long-term solution at both first and third base.

I don't think there is an easy answer as to how (which is what I expected you to want to hear). For me, its to see better players on the field with a hope that they continue to improve into really good players. My hope if that after Friday we could have some more long term solutions for corner infielders, and into September when the rosters expand to see if maybe we can have a small stretch of games that might be a better picture of what the team will look like next season.

Even though it would be a hollow victory, aren't we only like 5 gms behind the Jays.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are my expectations unrealistic when MacPhail said the O's will be competitive in 2010? How about MacPhail might be a little unrealistic.. not the fans that see through the BS.

Not trying to stir the pot here, I am just curious when MacPhail said the O's would be competitive in 2010. I don't recall ever hearing or reading that...but I may be way off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all part of your unrealistic expectations that derive from your lack of patience established lo all those many posts ago.

Answer me this, and this will end this whole debate.....

Do you realistically think that in 2010 the Orioles will be competitive?? As MacPhail has touted when he assumed the job to run the O's FO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answer me this, and this will end this whole debate.....

Do you realistically think that in 2010 the Orioles will be competitive?? As MacPhail has touted when he assumed the job to run the O's FO?

Realistically? Absolutely.

Guaranteed? Of course not.

These are young players whose development is impossible to predict with any certainty, though you feel they should all come up and star like Evan Longoria. Again, unrealistic expectations. It doesn't matter how many times you say "Nuh-uh!"

And I would like to see that source for 2010, as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answer me this, and this will end this whole debate.....

Do you realistically think that in 2010 the Orioles will be competitive?? As MacPhail has touted when he assumed the job to run the O's FO?

Again...when has MacPhail stated that the Orioles will be competitive in 2010? Did he actually say this, or are you implying this through various statements made by AM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I guess there are more people like me that have the same view.. all you have to do is look at the empty seats bud.

To be fair, even when we being competitive for most of 1st half even in 1st till the break just a few seasons ago, the stands were still empty, bad excuse...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again...when has MacPhail stated that the Orioles will be competitive in 2010? Did he actually say this, or are you implying this through various statements made by AM?

Well, to be fair to him, he's proof that it's very easy to imply the obvious through one's statements.

However, I don't think you can get any kind of absolute timetable even implied from MacPhail's comments, and won't believe otherwise until it is shown to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...