Jump to content

Anyone Have Any Idea Why AM Won't Add the Desperately Needed Big Bat?


Old#5fan

Recommended Posts

:confused:Other than money, does anyone have any idea why AM refuses to get the much needed big bat for the middle of the lineup?:confused: I really am frustrated with his supposed attempt of having Atkins fill this void. It reminds me more of a Syd Thrift type of move (cheapskate).:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Who do you want him to add??? Boras came out and told him that Beltre wasn't interested in playing for us and Holliday got paid a ridiculous contract. So who does that leave that you want AM to sign?

Delgado is about the only one left now after the Rangers smartly signed Vlad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a big bat available, and this one can fly on the basepaths as well. Defensively, he moves well, and he can snatch anything out of the air. Doesn't have a good throwing arm. He plays better at night.

-Larrytt

P.S. It's hard to get a big bat for the middle of the order when there aren't any available that aren't aging (Delgado played 26 games last year, and turns 38 in June), too expensive, or where we'd have to trade away our future. The minute the O's show they can contend, that's when they should break the bank or trade prospects for one. By then, of course, one of our current players (Wieters, Jones, Reimold?) might become that big cleanup bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delgado is about the only one left now after the Rangers smartly signed Vlad.

You think Guerrero could have been the "big bat?"

Did you see him last season?

Did you check his numbers?

There's a reason the Angels let him go without a whimper. Atkins has a good chance of being more productive than Vlad in 2010, and I don't even like the Atkins signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delgado is about the only one left now after the Rangers smartly signed Vlad.

Did you watch Vlad play last year. The warm weather and rock hard field may help him next year but Vlad looked old and slow last year. I think AM is waiting to see who develops and where. I really was not a big fan of any of the so called big bats that were free agents this year. Would you have given 120 million plus to Holliday??

I think we will see a different approach if the pitching takes hold this year. If Matusz and Tillman develop into big league starters and we are not more active next year then I will join you in griping. Until we can pitch we will lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:confused:Other than money, does anyone have any idea why AM refuses to get the much needed big bat for the middle of the lineup?:confused: I really am frustrated with his supposed attempt of having Atkins fill this void. It reminds me more of a Syd Thrift type of move (cheapskate).:(

I do not remember reading that the Atkins signing was an attempt to fill our "big bat void" ....

Still, AM did say he was going to buy some bats this winter and hinted we would land some quality ones and he has yet to do that. Maybe he thinks one of LaRoche/Delgado will sign on our terms. Those are decent bats, but unless AM pulls a rabbit out of his hat I'll feel like AM's bat hints were not fulfilled.

The winter is not over and I hope AM is trying to wait out some GMs who have to cut payroll or something. Even if AM is playing it for 2011, I would have liked to see more assistance provided to the 2010 team. We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think Guerrero could have been the "big bat?"

Did you see him last season?

Did you check his numbers?

There's a reason the Angels let him go without a whimper. Atkins has a good chance of being more productive than Vlad in 2010, and I don't even like the Atkins signing.

Of course he didn't check his numbers. He doesn't have to. His name is Vladimir Guerrero.

He "strikes fear into pitchers." :rolleyes:

Again he's a recognizable name, and that's good enough for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MacPhail never said that they were going to be "big bat" shoppers, just "bat" shoppers.

Atkins is a bat, therefore MacPhail has lived up to his promise.

What is your fascination with "promises" and "guarantees?"

You realize this is professional sports, that neither of those two things really exist.... right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he didn't check his numbers. He doesn't have to. His name is Vladimir Guerrero.

He "strikes fear into pitchers." :rolleyes:

Again he's a recognizable name, and that's good enough for some.

Didn't we try that with some guy named Sosa. He had an even bigger scary name than Vlad. Didn't work too well IIRC.:rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least we can rest assured that someone among us is not lulled to sleep by MacPhail's complicated rhetoric and has risen to challenge his authority.

:rolleyes:

Supposedly MacPhail has tried to acquire Butler/Gordon from KC but they weren't interested. On top of that, our choices were Glaus, Delgado & Holliday on the FA Market. I honestly don't blame him for his inactivity thus far.

If this is the roster when we head into Spring Training, I will definitely be disappointed, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think Guerrero could have been the "big bat?"

Did you see him last season?

Did you check his numbers?

There's a reason the Angels let him go without a whimper. Atkins has a good chance of being more productive than Vlad in 2010, and I don't even like the Atkins signing.

Vlad's knees are shot and he has trouble catching up to the outside fastball now but do you really think Atkins will be better? If so, perhaps you would be interested in a friendly wager? :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think the development system was his biggest downfall. Though the blacklisting from S. Korea isn't great either.  They could draft well, but not develop well as evidence by some of his draft prospects thriving in the new Orioles environment.  On a side note, I blame Angelos and company more than DD for the delay (and ultimately the poor execution) in selling off the core of the 2012-2016 teams. I think its better practice to bring in a new GM to down the dismantling. As unbias as someone tries to be, its got to be harder for the GM that built the team to dismantle it without some level of bias. 
    • I don't think anyone will disagree with any of that, but I think Wildcard was saying that a hopefully contending team still has players from the Duquette regime contributing five years later. I'm going to pick Elias 1000 times in 1000 for the way baseball is played now with technology, but Duqutte did do several good things and did build a team that had a core run. Obviously Buck gets some credit here too for that run, but before the Toronto thing happened that sucked most of Duquette's power away, They were a great duo when it came to putting a winning major league team on the field. The drafting was pretty solid behind Rajsich but the development was clearly behind the times and that hurt the organization. Elias is heads and shoulders above anything Duquette installed development wise.
    • Fangraphs with a belated look at the Irvin trade: “As Eric pointed out to me, Hernaiz was going to have a tough time climbing the hitter-heavy Baltimore system, so he was a luxury there. In that sense, this trade is a good reallocation of resources. Baltimore is competing in a brutal division at the major league level and could use pitching help. Oakland is competing for the first pick in the draft and is in dire need of a farm system overhaul. I don’t think this trade is going to swing the AL East or West anytime soon, but I do think it’s a good bit of business by two rational teams with differing objectives.” https://blogs.fangraphs.com/cole-comfort-orioles-bolster-rotation-in-trade-with-oakland/ There’s some breakdown of Irvin’s stuff in the article, nothing earth-shattering.   
    • Hopefully you know that Dan Duquette had nothing to do with the Chris Davis signing, right? Peter Angelos made that signing at the behest of Buck Showalter.
    • It's apparent that the O's are acquiring pitching that's closer to ready while developing hitting. It's not like they don't have young pitchers too, but they must see more risk there. Just look at the staff now. It's mostly guys who had already worked their way through some of the developmental steps. The O's identify guys they think they can help and go get them, mostly for very cheap.  That's not a mistake or an oversight. It's their model based strategy. Now you may think you have a better model, but I kind of doubt it. We also haven't seen this plan fully mature yet. The international guys aren't ready and many of the draft picks are just starting to get to the higher levels. Heck, we've just now started to implement trading prospect bats for pitching and we got 4 years control of an average starter for our 6th-7th best SS prospect.    This isn't exhaustive, but here's a lot of our top guys and how they were acquired. I'd say we have a decent staff even before maturation of the system and/or making many hitting prospect for pitcher trades. Gibson, Voth, Watkins, Baker, Bautista, Wells, Givens, Krehbiel  - Signed or claimed Bradish, Kremer, Zimmermann, Tate, Irvin, Perez, Vespi - Via Trade Hall, Rodriguez, Means, Baumann, Akin - Homegrown  
    • Honestly I don’t know why anyone would want to buy a minority interest in the Orioles at this stage.  That would be such an exercise in frustration.  I guess it could be a decent investment financially because franchise values only go up, but I wouldn’t want to tie up my money in any enterprise controlled by the Angelos family.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...