Jump to content

Crowley likes Aubrey


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

Crowley's job is to be something of a cheerleader. He rarely says a negative word about anyone, and he wants them thinking positive. So, you have to take what he says about Aubrey with a grain of salt. That said, Aubrey did not embarass himself out there last year.

This.

Funny how people bring up Crowley's comments about Pie all the time and at least one of those people is saying Crowley's is wrong.

Crowley's comments should always be taking with a grain of salt...no matter the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Aubrey has been a pretty good hitter over his minor leaguer career and he showed enough in his major league time that I'm not opposed to him being the placeholder for Snyder and/or Bell.

Injuries have been his biggest problem, but I liked his swing and felt he looked pretty good defensively at 1B. Honestly, I'd rather have him there then signing Crede.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not shocked that message is coming from MASN as Melewski is basically a mouthpiece for the organization.

And Zrebiec only says what MacPhail wants him to say.

It's a shame because if the Red Sox or Yankees were to try this their respective FOs would be skewered in the local press, especially after MacPhail made that statement that can be found in my sig.

I just can't believe nobody is picking up on that he's failed to do his job this offseason.

Happy 26,000!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aubrey's minor league career has been riddled with injuries, both serious and nagging. I think using his MiL stats to evaluate him is flawed. Crowley didn't have to go so far as to say that there's no doubt that Aubrey is a major league hitter.

But I also think the "extrapolators" have some flawed thinking. Small sample size, September mop up time, etc.

Both sides considered, I'd love a good old fashioned spring training competition. With any new addition as well as with Scott, Wigginton and Aubrey. A smart platoon could end up being the answer, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

Funny how people bring up Crowley's comments about Pie all the time and at least one of those people is saying Crowley's is wrong.

Crowley's comments should always be taking with a grain of salt...no matter the player.

I don't think it's only about what Crowley said about Pie. It's also about what Pie has said about Crowley, for me at least. All the coaches have to be cheerleaders somewhat. So that's not that uncommon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both sides considered, I'd love a good old fashioned spring training competition. With any new addition as well as with Scott, Wigginton and Aubrey. A smart platoon could end up being the answer, too.

That's what we thought about the 2008 SS situation.

1B is going to be that all over again IMO with Snyder spending most of the year in AAA.

Garrett Atkins, Rhyne Hughes and Scott Moore will be in the picture as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not shocked that message is coming from MASN as Melewski is basically a mouthpiece for the organization.

And Zrebiec only says what MacPhail wants him to say.

It's a shame because if the Red Sox or Yankees were to try this their respective FOs would be skewered in the local press, especially after MacPhail made that statement that can be found in my sig.

I just can't believe nobody is picking up on that he's failed to do his job this offseason.

Because most objective observers disagree. Show me an article by any outside journalist saying MacPhail has done a bad job this winter. There aren't any.

That said, I am not happy with the state of 1B/3B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's only about what Crowley said about Pie. It's also about what Pie has said about Crowley, for me at least. All the coaches have to be cheerleaders somewhat. So that's not that uncommon.

Crow's comments about Pie is the one that came to my head first. I am not talking about whether or not Crow's comments are accurate...but that we should take his comments with a grain of salt...like Frobby said in his post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because most objective observers disagree. Show me an article by any outside journalist saying MacPhail has done a bad job this winter. There aren't any.

That said, I am not happy with the state of 1B/3B.

He hasn't done anything stupid, but he hasn't done anything that improves the team greatly either.

It's not that he's done a bad job, it's that he hasn't done what he said it was his job to do. And the Orioles are pretty irrelevant to the national media so they wouldn't pick up on that quote at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crow's comments about Pie is the one that came to my head first. I am not talking about whether or not Crow's comments are accurate...but that we should take his comments with a grain of salt...like Frobby said in his post.

I agree that the Aubrey statements are a bit generic, seems like he was just trying to be nice and supportive, nothing more. Crowley on Pie seemed more genuine to me though, don't know why. Maybe it's hopeful thinking or I got caught up in the emotional interview with Pie and the cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hasn't done anything stupid, but he hasn't done anything that improves the team greatly either.

It's not that he's done a bad job, it's that he hasn't done what he said it was his job to do. And the Orioles are pretty irrelevant to the national media so they wouldn't pick up on that quote at all.

He improved the starting pitching with Millwood, and the relief corps by adding a closer in Gonzales. He's giving Crowley a chance to rework Atkins as a stopgap and he apparently believes both Snyder and Bell are part of the future here.

I would have liked to see him acquire a shortstop of the future, but overall, considering what was available, I don't see how we're not improved. Are we contenders? No. But with improvements by Wieters, Jones, Matusz, Tillman, Reimold, and Bergesen to go along with Roberts and Markakis I think we have a better team than last year.

If the Orioles can win around 80-games this year and we see improvement by those young players and the continued improvements by Bell and Snyder in AAA then this coming year is a success.

I'd like to see both Bell and Snyder during the second half of the year so they will both be ready for full-time by 2011 which just happens to correspond with MacPhail's plan all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He improved the starting pitching with Millwood, and the relief corps by adding a closer in Gonzales. He's giving Crowley a chance to rework Atkins as a stopgap and he apparently believes both Snyder and Bell are part of the future here.

I would have liked to see him acquire a shortstop of the future, but overall, considering what was available, I don't see how we're not improved. Are we contenders? No. But with improvements by Wieters, Jones, Matusz, Tillman, Reimold, and Bergesen to go along with Roberts and Markakis I think we have a better team than last year.

If the Orioles can win around 80-games this year and we see improvement by those young players and the continued improvements by Bell and Snyder in AAA then this coming year is a success.

I'd like to see both Bell and Snyder during the second half of the year so they will both be ready for full-time by 2011 which just happens to correspond with MacPhail's plan all along.

I love it when a plan comes together. Boy, did I just date myself.:laughlol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...