Jump to content

The guy I keep waiting for: Schoop


Frobby

Recommended Posts

As I think about how we can compensate for the loss of Manny on the offensive side, I feel like one of the possibilities should be improved hitting from Jonathan Schoop. Not that I'm expecting him to hit as well as Manny, but I just feel he should be able to do better than .216/.254/.340 now that he has 349 major league plate appearances under his belt.

Schoop does have a .250/.308/.542 line in August, but I'm not putting too much stock in that. It's a small sample and he was hitting .200 before going 2 for 4 yesterday. But doesn't Schoop have to figure things out sometime? I mean, he looks like a major leaguer to me, but he has really struggled despite the occasional bomb and clutch hit.

Now would be a good time for him to figure things out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Lots of ground outs to infielders, unless the pitch is a clear mistake up in the zone. Ryan Flaherty also looks like a major leaguer, and he hasn't figured it out either.

Schoop makes alright contact, though, and you would think he runs into more hits by accident alone. I really have no idea what to think about him. He swings hard as hell. A little shorter stroke might go a long way.

A little pitch selection would go a long way too. His approach at the plate is often times worse than Adam Jones on his worst days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of ground outs to infielders, unless the pitch is a clear mistake up in the zone. Ryan Flaherty also looks like a major leaguer, and he hasn't figured it out either.

Schoop makes alright contact, though, and you would think he runs into more hits by accident alone. I really have no idea what to think about him. He swings hard as hell. A little shorter stroke might go a long way.

12.6% line drive percentage. That's awful. Too aggressive at plate to boot. Usually hits an accidental homer a couple times a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's way too early to italicize the word "sometime." He's a rookie, and rookies don't always hit well in their first year. He does show signs of power, which is encouraging for the future. And despite a couple flubs the last two games, he's obviously a strong defender.

I'm not expecting him to post great #s the rest of the way. I'd take great defense and slightly improved hitting in a heartbeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Jonathan Schoop vs. NYY: .385 (10-for-26) with 3 HRs, 10 RBIs, .808 slugging and 1.215 OPS. Leads team in all categories.</p>— Steve Melewski (@masnSteve) <a href="
">August 12, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Well there's that, at least!

Heh, isn't almost all of that against Tanaka though? Seems like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schoop's 2014 reminds me of Bedard's 2004. Both earned (were given due to lack of better options?) MLB regular gigs with a less than ideal amount of minor league experience. I remember after Bedard finished a 1.1 rWAR year, the main thing that impressed me was that as a rookie, he simply survived the entire season without being knocked out of the box.

Schoop at 0.9 rWAR with seven weeks to go. He's flirted with being so bad you have to bench, but hasn't forced Buck's hand yet. If he finishes even a little better than he's been so far, I think the org has to be thrilled with his progress this year. Even continuing at the same pace, this year's no catastrophe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh, isn't almost all of that against Tanaka though? Seems like it.

He actually has hit the entire AL EAST this season if you look at his numbers over his career. He hits Boston well and the Jays as well. The rays only team he has OPS under .800 against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Jonathan Schoop vs. NYY: .385 (10-for-26) with 3 HRs, 10 RBIs, .808 slugging and 1.215 OPS. Leads team in all categories.</p>— Steve Melewski (@masnSteve) <a href="
">August 12, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Well there's that, at least!

Great. Just play him against the Yankees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schoop's 2014 reminds me of Bedard's 2004. Both earned (were given due to lack of better options?) MLB regular gigs with a less than ideal amount of minor league experience. I remember after Bedard finished a 1.1 rWAR year, the main thing that impressed me was that as a rookie, he simply survived the entire season without being knocked out of the box.

Schoop at 0.9 rWAR with seven weeks to go. He's flirted with being so bad you have to bench, but hasn't forced Buck's hand yet. If he finishes even a little better than he's been so far, I think the org has to be thrilled with his progress this year. Even continuing at the same pace, this year's no catastrophe.

Let's be honest, his bat has been a catastrophe. The only reason he's still up here is because of his glove. That's it. He hasn't progressed as a hitter, IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be honest, his bat has been a catastrophe. The only reason he's still up here is because of his glove. That's it. He hasn't progressed as a hitter, IMHO.

He actually has not been as bad as many people believe this is not the 90s anymore hitting is down. He actually has a higher War then gus like Kipnis, Infante, and Beckman. Yeah his defense helps but a .220 average now is equal to around .240-.250.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He actually has not been as bad as many people believe this is not the 90s anymore hitting is down. He actually has a higher War then gus like Kipnis, Infante, and Beckman. Yeah his defense helps but a .220 average now is equal to around .240-.250.

No, he has been that bad. Even accounting for the fact that offense is down, Schoop's OPS right now is worse than 11 other qualifying second basemen in the league, and that includes all three guys you mentioned. There's no getting around the fact that his offense has been atrocious in every single aspect except home runs. It is a fair argument to say if not for his defense he wouldn't be in the big leagues right now, because his total offensive performance doesn't merit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...