Jump to content

Matt Wieters - Gold Glove nominee?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

700 inning minimum for all rate stats -- 10 catchers meet this criterion

Innings caught - 3rd

Caught stealing % - 3rd

Passed balls % - 1st

SB attempts/inning - 4th

SB/inning - 3rd

CERA - 2nd (!)

dWAR - 3rd

Fangraphs' defense - 3rd

Fielding % - 9th

You can make a plausible case for Wieters to be one of the three nominees, though I expect Sal Perez will win once again. He wasn't as good at blocking pitches as in the past (more wild pitches, though only 1 PB), BP's framing stats have him a little below average and he did make 11 errors, but I won't be surprised if he gets a nomination.

I know we don't put much stock in CERA, but I was surprised to see his at 4.00.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700 inning minimum for all rate stats -- 10 catchers meet this criterion

Innings caught - 3rd

Caught stealing % - 3rd

Passed balls % - 1st

SB attempts/inning - 4th

SB/inning - 3rd

CERA - 2nd (!)

dWAR - 3rd

Fangraphs' defense - 3rd

Fielding % - 9th

You can make a plausible case for Wieters to be one of the three nominees, though I expect Sal Perez will win once again. He wasn't as good at blocking pitches as in the past (more wild pitches, though only 1 PB), BP's framing stats have him a little below average and he did make 11 errors, but I won't be surprised if he gets a nomination.

I know we don't put much stock in CERA, but I was surprised to see his at 4.00.

Wieters is a better C than most here give him credit for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieters is a better C than most here give him credit for.

Wieters has been a very good defensive catcher for years. This was not his best. At times he was really struggling.

As bad as catching has been this season I guess he could be top three, but he doesn't deserve the award.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Nope.

Carlos Perez

James McCann

Salvador Perez

GG nomination thread will be forthcoming.

I'm slightly surprised to see Carlos Perez on the list, since he started less than half of his team's games. He is a good defensive catcher, though. In any event, I'm confident that Sal Perez will win the GG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was. He's slower than he was when he was in his mid-20s. It shows in his release - it used to be lightning fast.

He still showed that at times this season. He nailed that runner at first in Toronto was a thing of beauty.

An older MW is still better behind the plate than a majority of his peers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm slightly surprised to see Carlos Perez on the list, since he started less than half of his team's games. He is a good defensive catcher, though. In any event, I'm confident that Sal Perez will win the GG.

I guess that would prove that pitch framing isn't included in the decision since he's in the bottom third to bottom quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that would prove that pitch framing isn't included in the decision since he's in the bottom third to bottom quarter.

Nah GG voting isn't that in depth. What matters more is that Salvador Perez has won the last 3 AL GG's. Over the years voters just go on auto pilot with voting guys. S. Perez wins it easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah GG voting isn't that in depth. What matters more is that Salvador Perez has won the last 3 AL GG's. Over the years voters just go on auto pilot with voting guys. S. Perez wins it easily.

Putting aside autopilot, Perez caught the most innings of any catcher in the AL, had a 48% CS%, and is rated tops defensively by fangraphs. BP has him 1st in throwing runs and blocking runs in the AL. They do see him as a poor framer, but I do not think GG voters are ready to accept that framing is nearly as impactful as the current stats suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...