Jump to content

Matt Wieters - Gold Glove nominee?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

700 inning minimum for all rate stats -- 10 catchers meet this criterion

Innings caught - 3rd

Caught stealing % - 3rd

Passed balls % - 1st

SB attempts/inning - 4th

SB/inning - 3rd

CERA - 2nd (!)

dWAR - 3rd

Fangraphs' defense - 3rd

Fielding % - 9th

You can make a plausible case for Wieters to be one of the three nominees, though I expect Sal Perez will win once again. He wasn't as good at blocking pitches as in the past (more wild pitches, though only 1 PB), BP's framing stats have him a little below average and he did make 11 errors, but I won't be surprised if he gets a nomination.

I know we don't put much stock in CERA, but I was surprised to see his at 4.00.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700 inning minimum for all rate stats -- 10 catchers meet this criterion

Innings caught - 3rd

Caught stealing % - 3rd

Passed balls % - 1st

SB attempts/inning - 4th

SB/inning - 3rd

CERA - 2nd (!)

dWAR - 3rd

Fangraphs' defense - 3rd

Fielding % - 9th

You can make a plausible case for Wieters to be one of the three nominees, though I expect Sal Perez will win once again. He wasn't as good at blocking pitches as in the past (more wild pitches, though only 1 PB), BP's framing stats have him a little below average and he did make 11 errors, but I won't be surprised if he gets a nomination.

I know we don't put much stock in CERA, but I was surprised to see his at 4.00.

Wieters is a better C than most here give him credit for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieters is a better C than most here give him credit for.

Wieters has been a very good defensive catcher for years. This was not his best. At times he was really struggling.

As bad as catching has been this season I guess he could be top three, but he doesn't deserve the award.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Nope.

Carlos Perez

James McCann

Salvador Perez

GG nomination thread will be forthcoming.

I'm slightly surprised to see Carlos Perez on the list, since he started less than half of his team's games. He is a good defensive catcher, though. In any event, I'm confident that Sal Perez will win the GG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was. He's slower than he was when he was in his mid-20s. It shows in his release - it used to be lightning fast.

He still showed that at times this season. He nailed that runner at first in Toronto was a thing of beauty.

An older MW is still better behind the plate than a majority of his peers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm slightly surprised to see Carlos Perez on the list, since he started less than half of his team's games. He is a good defensive catcher, though. In any event, I'm confident that Sal Perez will win the GG.

I guess that would prove that pitch framing isn't included in the decision since he's in the bottom third to bottom quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that would prove that pitch framing isn't included in the decision since he's in the bottom third to bottom quarter.

Nah GG voting isn't that in depth. What matters more is that Salvador Perez has won the last 3 AL GG's. Over the years voters just go on auto pilot with voting guys. S. Perez wins it easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah GG voting isn't that in depth. What matters more is that Salvador Perez has won the last 3 AL GG's. Over the years voters just go on auto pilot with voting guys. S. Perez wins it easily.

Putting aside autopilot, Perez caught the most innings of any catcher in the AL, had a 48% CS%, and is rated tops defensively by fangraphs. BP has him 1st in throwing runs and blocking runs in the AL. They do see him as a poor framer, but I do not think GG voters are ready to accept that framing is nearly as impactful as the current stats suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...