Jump to content

Are we going to miss the 80 stolen bases?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
BRob: 36 SB's in 2006, 50 SB's in 2007

CPat: 45 SB's in 2006, 37 SB's in 2007

If neither player is back in 2008, how badly will we miss that basestealing ability in the lineup?

I'll tell you who will them and thats Nick Markakis. He had good base stealing stats last season but a lot of them (especially early on in the year) came at the back end of double steals. It'll be interesting to see if he can reach 20 or more this year without their help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BRob: 36 SB's in 2006, 50 SB's in 2007

CPat: 45 SB's in 2006, 37 SB's in 2007

If neither player is back in 2008, how badly will we miss that basestealing ability in the lineup?

As I recall, almost everytime you did a month-by-month comparison of the O's last season, it was usually the defense and pitching that failed us most in the months where we struggled and that surprisingly the offense was fairly consistent, at least month by month. So in that regard, unless the pitching makes up the difference, I think it may matter a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're definitely going to miss the SBs, and they can't be replaced easily, because those guys in addition to getting high quantaties of steals, are also high percentage runners (84% between the two of them last year).

We're not gonna replace that, at least not easily. However, that still doesn't create an amount of runs that is terribly difficult to add in other areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, great question Frobby.

As we are configured right now the Orioles have very little power. Without the power you have a tough time driving guys in from first. How many times did Brob steal second and score on a single or go from first to second to third and then score on a out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BRob: 36 SB's in 2006, 50 SB's in 2007

CPat: 45 SB's in 2006, 37 SB's in 2007

If neither player is back in 2008, how badly will we miss that basestealing ability in the lineup?

The Orioles will definitely miss those SBs but mainly the speed that goes with it. The advantage of having speed guys like Roberts and Patterson is to force the other team to make an error or a mistake since they would know that it is possible for them to attempt to stretch out a single into a double or a double into a triple is the right opportunity presented itself.

IMO, the Orioles are mainly a station-to-station team so without the threat of the 'speed' and/or stolen base threat, teams can relax a little more knowing that they will not have to worry about someone attempting to capitalize mistakes/errors and taking an extra base. The lack of the speed, if it is not replaced, may drive up the possibility of more double plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...