Jump to content

Ok, let's say Bundy stays healthy and develops to reach his ceiling


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think he is more 94-96, bumping higher. That is a comfy 60 knocked a very little bit for command. 70 for me would be up to 98 regularly with command or mid-90s with a lot of life. 80 bump the mphs some for each (100+ straight velo or 97/98 mph with lots of life). If anything, I may be light on his command, which I have heard some evaluators I respect rate as ML average or better right now. I have no doubt it's plus as a future grade. I think the FB as a future 70 is reasonable, but I'm generally conservative as to projecting velo w/HS arms.

Fair enough. Here's an article that quoted him touching 100:

http://coachesaid.com/Blog/Michael-Swisher/2011/4/19/Dylan-Bundy-100-Miles-Per-Hour

Of course, that might have just been one of those days for him. If you consider him to be mid-90s with the ability to pump up to upper 90s, then I understand your rating. And I understand your hesitation with over-projecting HS arms; it seems fairly common that HS arms don't develop the way you'd hope in terms of increased velocity. Seems that they're more likely to improve movement/command, which offsets a loss in velocity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough. Here's an article that quoted him touching 100:

http://coachesaid.com/Blog/Michael-Swisher/2011/4/19/Dylan-Bundy-100-Miles-Per-Hour

Of course, that might have just been one of those days for him. If you consider him to be mid-90s with the ability to pump up to upper 90s, then I understand your rating. And I understand your hesitation with over-projecting HS arms; it seems fairly common that HS arms don't develop the way you'd hope in terms of increased velocity. Seems that they're more likely to improve movement/command, which offsets a loss in velocity.

Dylan worked hard to be able to touch triple digits this year, and as some scouts say if you flash the tool you have it. I'm a bit more conservative than that, particularly with velo.

The reality is that once Dylan is throwing on 4 days rest against more consistent hitting and attempting to log 200 innings a season, he'll have to dial it down a notch. Sitting 95 and touching 98 sounds right, which is still plus velo. One of Dylan's seven tenets is to never, ever, throw a pitch with 100 percent effort in a game. He knows his body and understands what he is capable of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dylan worked hard to be able to touch triple digits this year, and as some scouts say if you flash the tool you have it. I'm a bit more conservative than that, particularly with velo.

The reality is that once Dylan is throwing on 4 days rest against more consistent hitting and attempting to log 200 innings a season, he'll have to dial it down a notch. Sitting 95 and touching 98 sounds right, which is still plus velo. One of Dylan's seven tenets is to never, ever, throw a pitch with 100 percent effort in a game. He knows his body and understands what he is capable of.

Yeah, just a big difference between touching 100, and being able to sit there. Bundy is a half notch below Strassy's pre-injury velo, but I'm sure he ends up sitting somewhere around 95 give or take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What level starter are we looking at here?

Are talking a #1 starter on an ok team or are we talking an ace level guy that would be in the class of guy like Felix?

Reaches ceiling? #1 on first division team.

So what year does Sports Guy start trying to trade Bundy for Kotchman's little brother? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current (Future)

Motion: 55 (60)

Fastball: 55/60 (65/70)

Curve: 45/50 (60)

Change: 40 (55/60)

Cutter: 50/55 (60/65)

Control: 45/50 (60)

Command: 40/45 (55/60)

Feel: 45/50 (60)

Overall Future Potential: 58/62 (front-end starter/#1 upside)

To help a simple fan out... how would you rate Strasburg, Verlander, or even Roy Halladay now? Strasburg obviously is injured, but I am trying to be able to draw an MLB comparison, if that is possible. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To help a simple fan out... how would you rate Strasburg, Verlander, or even Roy Halladay now? Strasburg obviously is injured, but I am trying to be able to draw an MLB comparison, if that is possible. Thanks.

I think I had Strasburg a 64 or 65 overall.

I think the future grades were FB (80) CB (70) CH (65) Command (60) Feel (60) Motion (50/55)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current (Future)

Motion: 55 (60)

Fastball: 55/60 (65/70)

Curve: 45/50 (60)

Change: 40 (55/60)

Cutter: 50/55 (60/65)

Control: 45/50 (60)

Command: 40/45 (55/60)

Feel: 45/50 (60)

Overall Future Potential: 58/62 (front-end starter/#1 upside)

I think I had Strasburg a 64 or 65 overall.

I think the future grades were FB (80) CB (70) CH (65) Command (60) Feel (60) Motion (50/55)

That helps me. So at this point, Bundy does not have quite the potential that Strasburg did. Which seems about right since Cole, Hultzen, and Bauer were picked ahead of him. Hopefully, Bundy stays healthy and progresses nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That helps me. So at this point, Bundy does not have quite the potential that Strasburg did. Which seems about right since Cole, Hultzen, and Bauer were picked ahead of him. Hopefully, Bundy stays healthy and progresses nicely.

Right. Bundy's upside doesn't match Strasburg's (or Cole's). But it's definitely #1 stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That helps me. So at this point, Bundy does not have quite the potential that Strasburg did. Which seems about right since Cole, Hultzen, and Bauer were picked ahead of him. Hopefully, Bundy stays healthy and progresses nicely.

Hultzen went to Seattle because they wanted a college starter that could move quickly and Arizona liked Bauer a lot and also had the 3rd and 7th picks so they could spend too much money. I wouldn't say it necessarily has anything to say about Dylan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What level starter are we looking at here?

Are talking a #1 starter on an ok team or are we talking an ace level guy that would be in the class of guy like Felix?

Bundy reaching his ceiling means the Os would have one of the best five to 10 SPs in MLB - a la Felix, Verlander, CC, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Ceiling" is nice to dream about, but how often do we see it attained? Bedard, I guess, reached his ceiling (exceeded it?) before he got hurt.

I'll bet you a dollar Stotle's rankings are based on projection, not absolute ceiling. Bundy's absolute ceiling is probably a tick higher across the board, but so was Strasburg's (except for his fastball).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Ceiling" is nice to dream about, but how often do we see it attained? Bedard, I guess, reached his ceiling (exceeded it?) before he got hurt.

High school arms are perhaps the biggest risk (generally speaking) of falling short of their "ceiling". The hope, I imagine, is that Bundy is such a workout fanatic and professional in his approach that he will be able to avoid injury and the not-uncommon occurence of HS arms losing some velo/stuff as they are asked to through higher-pressure innings against better competition on less rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...